PURPOSE: Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after chemotherapy can lead to liver failure and death. Conflicting recommendations regarding HBV screening in cancer patients awaiting chemotherapy mean that some patients at risk for HBV reactivation are not being identified and treated with prophylactic antiviral therapy. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the existing evidence regarding screening for and management of HBV infection among patients with cancer using Ovid Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Our review showed inconsistencies in the definition and management strategies for HBV reactivation. The timeframe of reactivation is variable, and its molecular mechanisms are not clear. There are five effective antiviral agents that can be used as prophylaxis to prevent reactivation of HBV infection in cancer patients; however, the optimal drug and duration of therapy are unknown. Reactivation is more commonly reported in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving rituximab treatment, but reactivation can occur after other chemotherapies and in patients with solid tumors. Screening with all three screening tests-HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs-allows the most thorough interpretation of a patient's serologic profile and assessment of reactivation risk; however, decision-making and cost-effectiveness studies are needed to determine optimal screening strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of reactivation of HBV infection depends on identification of patients at risk and initiation of antiviral prophylaxis, but data to guide screening and treatment strategies are lacking. Additional research is necessary to accurately define and predict reactivation, identify best antiviral treatment strategies, and identify cost-effective HBV screening strategies.
PURPOSE: Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after chemotherapy can lead to liver failure and death. Conflicting recommendations regarding HBV screening in cancerpatients awaiting chemotherapy mean that some patients at risk for HBV reactivation are not being identified and treated with prophylactic antiviral therapy. METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the existing evidence regarding screening for and management of HBV infection among patients with cancer using Ovid Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. RESULTS: Our review showed inconsistencies in the definition and management strategies for HBV reactivation. The timeframe of reactivation is variable, and its molecular mechanisms are not clear. There are five effective antiviral agents that can be used as prophylaxis to prevent reactivation of HBV infection in cancerpatients; however, the optimal drug and duration of therapy are unknown. Reactivation is more commonly reported in patients with hematologic malignancies receiving rituximab treatment, but reactivation can occur after other chemotherapies and in patients with solid tumors. Screening with all three screening tests-HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs-allows the most thorough interpretation of a patient's serologic profile and assessment of reactivation risk; however, decision-making and cost-effectiveness studies are needed to determine optimal screening strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Prevention of reactivation of HBV infection depends on identification of patients at risk and initiation of antiviral prophylaxis, but data to guide screening and treatment strategies are lacking. Additional research is necessary to accurately define and predict reactivation, identify best antiviral treatment strategies, and identify cost-effective HBV screening strategies.
Authors: Orhan Onder Eren; Mehmet Artac; Melih Cem Boruban; Ozlem Yavas; Ugur Arslan; Metin Basaranoglu Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2008-11-20 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Andrew S Artz; Mark R Somerfield; Jordan J Feld; Andrew F Giusti; Barnett S Kramer; Anita L Sabichi; Robin T Zon; Sandra L Wong Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sonali Paul; Akriti Saxena; Norma Terrin; Kathleen Viveiros; Ethan M Balk; John B Wong Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael Sandherr; Marcus Hentrich; Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal; Gero Massenkeil; Silke Neumann; Olaf Penack; Lena Biehl; Oliver A Cornely Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2015-07-21 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: Bahiddin Yilmaz; Dilek Erdem; Fatih Teker; Ibrahim Goren; Beytullah Yildirim; Engin Kut; Derya Sarikaya; Memis H Atay; Idris Yucel Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 1.671