Literature DB >> 22933007

[The artificial sphincter: therapy for faecal incontinence].

U Baumgartner1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Faecal incontinence (FI) challenges a patient's professional, social and sexual life. Often the patient becomes depressive and socially isolated. If able to break open for therapy the patient should receive as first line a conservative treatment (like dietary measures, pelvic re-education, biofeedback, bulking agents, irrigation). DISCUSSION: When is the time to implant an artificial anal sphincter? If conservative therapy fails as well as surgical options (like a sphincteroplasty - if indicated a reconstruction of the pelvic floor if insufficient, or a sacral nerve stimulation) an ultimo surgical procedure should be offered to appropriate and compliant patients: an artificial anal sphincter. Worldwide, there are two established devices on the market: the artificial bowel sphincter® (ABS) from A. M. S. (Minnetonka, MN, USA) and the soft anal band® from A. M. I. (Feldkirch, Austria). How to implant the artificial anal sphincter? Both devices consist of a silicon cuff which can be filled with fluid. Under absolute aseptic conditions this cuff is placed in the lithotomy position by perianal incisions around the anal canal below the pelvic floor. A silicon tube connects the anal cuff with a reservoir (containing fluid) which is placed either behind the pubis bone in front of the bladder (ABS) or below the costal arch (anal band). With a pump placed in the scrotum/labia (ABS) or by pressing the balloon (anal band) in both types operated by the patient the fluid is shifted forth and back between the anal cuff and the reservoir closing or opening the anal canal. Both systems are placed completely subcutaneously.
CONCLUSIONS: Both devices improve significantly the anal continence. Both systems have a high rate of reoperations. However, the causes for the redos are different. The ABS is associated with high infection and anal penetration rates of the cuff leading to an explantation rate to up to 60 % of the implants. This kind of complication seems to be much lower with the anal band. The major problem in the anal band is a defunctioning valve which occasionally has to be replaced. Despite these problems both types of artificial anal sphincters improve faecal incontinence significantly and, thus, quality of life of incontinent patients. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22933007     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Treatment of sphincter insufficiency].

Authors:  K E Matzel; B Bittorf
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Pelvic floor disorders from the surgeon's viewpoint].

Authors:  T H Schiedeck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  The use of a simple anal sling in the management of anal incontinence.

Authors:  José Manuel Devesa; Rosana Vicente
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2014-03-17

Review 4.  Artificial Muscle Devices: Innovations and Prospects for Fecal Incontinence Treatment.

Authors:  Elisa Fattorini; Tobia Brusa; Christian Gingert; Simone E Hieber; Vanessa Leung; Bekim Osmani; Marco D Dominietto; Philippe Büchler; Franc Hetzer; Bert Müller
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Efficacy of Biofeedback Therapy before and after Sphincteroplasty for Fecal Incontinence because of Obstetric Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Leila Ghahramani; Mastoureh Mohammadipour; Reza Roshanravan; Fahimeh Hajihosseini; Alimohammad Bananzadeh; Ahmad Izadpanah; Seyed Vahid Hosseini
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2016-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.