Literature DB >> 22932839

Radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein with the ClosureFAST™ procedure: mid-term experience on 400 patients from a single centre.

Valerio S Tolva1, Lea V Cireni, Paolo G Bianchi, Almarosa Lombardo, Guido C Keller, Renato M Casana.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Endovascular obliteration of the great saphenous vein (GSV) has been proposed as an alternative to conventional extirpative treatment of varicose veins.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This report reviewed the initial experience with the ClosureFAST™ procedure in 407 legs over a one-year period. Occlusion of the GSV was seen on 98 % of completion scans and in all patients within 1 week of the procedure. Persistent occlusion was documented in all cases. One had paresthesias and one had skin pigmentation. Three patients had transient superficial thrombophlebitis in a treated segment of a superficial collateral of the GSV. One patient was found to have extension of an asymptomatic, nonocclusive thrombus into the common femoral vein 1 week after the procedure.
CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency ablation of the GSV appears to be a safe alternative to conventional stripping and ligation. Randomised clinical trials and longer follow-up periods are required to establish the overall superiority of the procedure in comparison to conventional stripping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22932839     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-012-0296-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  16 in total

Review 1.  Endovenous radiofrequency ablation of saphenous vein reflux. The VNUS Closure procedure with Closurefast. An updated review.

Authors:  M Perrin
Journal:  Int Angiol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 2.  Endovenous radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of varicose veins.

Authors:  Alan M Dietzek
Journal:  Vascular       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.285

3.  High ligation and stripping of the long saphenous vein using the tumescent technique for local anesthesia.

Authors:  T M Proebstle; U Paepcke; G Weisel; S Gass; L Weber
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.398

4.  Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein.

Authors:  L Jones; B D Braithwaite; D Selwyn; S Cooke; J J Earnshaw
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.069

5.  Comparison of endovenous radiofrequency versus 810 nm diode laser occlusion of large veins in an animal model.

Authors:  Robert A Weiss
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.398

6.  Endovenous obliteration versus conventional stripping operation in the treatment of primary varicose veins: a randomized controlled trial with comparison of the costs.

Authors:  Tero Rautio; Arto Ohinmaa; Jukka Perälä; Pasi Ohtonen; Timo Heikkinen; Heikki Wiik; Pasi Karjalainen; Kari Haukipuro; Tatu Juvonen
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  The development of valvular incompetence after deep vein thrombosis: a follow-up study with duplex scanning.

Authors:  B van Ramshorst; P S van Bemmelen; H Hoeneveld; B C Eikelboom
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration (closure procedure) versus ligation and stripping in a selected patient population (EVOLVeS Study).

Authors:  F Lurie; D Creton; B Eklof; L S Kabnick; R L Kistner; O Pichot; S Schuller-Petrovic; C Sessa
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Combined endovascular laser with ambulatory phlebectomy for the treatment of superficial venous incompetence: a 2-year perspective.

Authors:  Neil S Sadick; Samuel Wasser
Journal:  J Cosmet Laser Ther       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.247

10.  Italian intersociety consensus statement on antithrombotic prophylaxis in hip and knee replacement and in femoral neck fracture surgery.

Authors:  F Randelli; F Biggi; G Della Rocca; P Grossi; D Imberti; R Landolfi; G Palareti; D Prisco
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-03
View more
  4 in total

1.  Pain Outcomes Following Mechanochemical Ablation vs Cyanoacrylate Adhesive for the Treatment of Primary Truncal Saphenous Vein Incompetence: The MOCCA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Amjad Belramman; Roshan Bootun; Tjun Yip Tang; Tristan R A Lane; Alun H Davies
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 16.681

Review 2.  Is radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins a valuable option? A systematic review of the literature with a cost analysis.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Jean-François Fisette; Suzanne K Bédard; Marc-Antoine Despatis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 3.  Clinical utility of the Covidien Closure Fast™ Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Catheter.

Authors:  Simon A Braithwaite; Bruce D Braithwaite
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-06-04

4.  Mechanochemical ablation versus cyanoacrylate adhesive for the treatment of varicose veins: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amjad Belramman; Roshan Bootun; Tjun Yip Tang; Tristan R A Lane; Alun H Davies
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.