| Literature DB >> 22932671 |
Liesbet Van Heirstraeten1, Samuel Coenen, Christine Lammens, Niel Hens, Herman Goossens, Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar.
Abstract
In Belgium, decreasing macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramins B, and tetracycline use during 1997-2007 correlated significantly with decreasing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes during 1999-2009. Maintaining drug use below a critical threshold corresponded with low-level macrolide-resistant S. pyogenes and an increased number of erm(A)-harboring emm77 S. pyogenes with low fitness costs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22932671 PMCID: PMC3437719 DOI: 10.3201/eid1809.120049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Prevalence of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes and proportions of the erm(A)-emm77 geno-emm-type among macrolide-resistant strains during 1999–2009, and macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins B, and tetracycline (MLST) use data expressed in packages/1,000 inhabitants/day (PID) during 1997–2007 in Belgium. Threshold indicates the critical level of macrolide, lincosamide, streptogramins B, and tetracycline use below which low-level macrolide-resistant S. pyogenes and selection of an inducible resistance mechanism with a lower fitness cost might be facilitated. Dotted line indicates start of the public health campaigns to reduce antimicrobial drug prescribing. The sharp increase in macrolide resistance in 2002 was linked to a local clonal outbreak of mef(A)-emm1 harboring S. pyogenes.
Figure 2Predominant geno-emm-types that accounted for >5% of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes, Belgium, 1999–2009.
Characteristics of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes used in competition experiments and relative fitness* of the erm(A)-emm77 geno-emm-type against competitor strains, Belgium, 1999–2009
| Geno- | Macrolide MIC, mg/L | Relative fitness (SD)† | p value, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erythromycin | Clindamycin |
| Competitor | |||
| 2 | 0.125 | ND | ND | ND | ||
| >512 | >512 | 1.03 (0.09) | 0.98 (0.09) | 0.662 | ||
| >512 | >512 | 1.27 (0.15) | 0.79 (0.09) | 0.080 | ||
| >512 | 256 | 2.12 (0.28) | 0.48 (0.06) | 0.013 | ||
| 8 | 0.125 | 1.29 (0.18) | 0.78 (0.11) | 0.105 | ||
| 8 | <0.03 | 1.55 (0.15) | 0.65 (0.06) | 0.047 | ||
| 16 | 0.5 | 1.01 (0.05) | 1.00 (0.06) | 0.934 | ||
*The ability of the bacteria to survive and reproduce. ND, no data. †Average of duplicate experiments.