Literature DB >> 22931971

Hemodynamic changes of fractional flow reserve after double kissing crush and provisional stenting technique for true bifurcation lesions.

Fei Ye1, Shao-Liang Chen, Jun-Jie Zhang, Zhong-Sheng Zhu, Jing Kan, Nai-Liang Tian, Song Lin, Zhi-Zhong Liu, Wei You, Hai-Mei Xu, Jing Xu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with fewer unfavorable events. However, the hemodynamic change in FFR after different stenting approaches for bifurcation lesions is still not fully studied. The aim of this study was to analyze the hemodynamic changes in FFR after double kissing (DK) crush and provisional side branch (SB) stenting (PS) for true coronary bifurcation lesions.
METHODS: Seventy-five patients with true bifurcated lesions were randomly divided into DK (n = 38) and PS (n = 37) groups. Additional SB stenting in the PS group was required if there was any pinched SB ostium > 70% stenosis, or ≥ type B dissection, or TIMI flow < grade 3. FFR at hyperemia in the main vessel (MV) and SB was measured prior- and post-stenting, and at 8 months follow-up.
RESULTS: Baseline clinical, angiographic and lesion characteristics were matched well between the two groups, with the exception of the final kissing balloon inflation (FKBI, 100.0% in the DK vs. 83.8% in the PS group, P < 0.001). Baseline FFR was comparable between the DK and the PS groups, however, the acute gain and late loss of SB FFR at 8-month follow-up in the DK group were 0.18 ± 0.15 and -0.06 ± 0.11, compared to 0.12 ± 0.18 (P = 0.044) and -0.002 ± 0.07 (P = 0.037) in the PS group, respectively. MV FFR post-stenting > 0.94 was seen in about 40% of patients. There was no significant difference in the clinical events at 1-year follow-up between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: DK crush was associated with improved acute gain and late loss of SB FFR. The lower rate of FFR > 0.94 after stenting underscored the further improvement of stenting quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22931971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  4 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Bifurcation Techniques for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Dae Yong Park; Seokyung An; Neeraj Jolly; Steve Attanasio; Neha Yadav; Sunil Rao; Aviral Vij
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 2.  Double kissing crush bifurcation stenting: step-by-step troubleshooting.

Authors:  Allison B Hall; Ivan Chavez; Santiago Garcia; Mario Gössl; Anil Poulose; Paul Sorajja; Yale Wang; Yves Louvard; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Subhash Banerjee; Iosif Xenogiannis; M Nicholas Burke; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.534

3.  Modified double-stent strategy may be an optimal choice for coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Hui Lv; Chen Guo; Min Li; Ming-Bo Zhang; Zhi-Lu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.889

4.  Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Bon-Kwon Koo; Jinlong Zhang; Jiesuck Park; Seokhun Yang; Minsang Kim; Jun Pil Yun; Joo Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Eun-Seok Shin; Joon-Hyung Doh; Shao-Liang Chen; Tsunekazu Kakuta; Gabor G Toth; Zsolt Piroth; Nils P Johnson; Nico H J Pijls; Abdul Hakeem; Barry F Uretsky; Yohei Hokama; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Hong-Seok Lim; Tsuyoshi Ito; Akiko Matsuo; Lorenzo Azzalini; Massoud A Leesar; Tara Neleman; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Roberto Diletti; Joost Daemen; Damien Collison; Carlos Collet; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-09-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.