Carey F McCarthy1, Patricia L Riley. 1. Division of Global HIV/AIDS Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, , MS-E41 Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. cmccarthy@cdc.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More than thirty-five sub-Saharan African countries have severe health workforce shortages. Many also struggle with a mismatch between the knowledge and competencies of health professionals and the needs of the populations they serve. Addressing these workforce challenges requires collaboration among health and education stakeholders and reform of health worker regulations. Health professional regulatory bodies, such as nursing and midwifery councils, have the mandate to reform regulations yet often do not have the resources or expertise to do so. In 2011, the United States of America Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began a four-year initiative to increase the collaboration among national stakeholders and help strengthen the capacity of health professional regulatory bodies to reform national regulatory frameworks. The initiative is called the African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives. This article describes the African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives and discusses its importance in implementing and sustaining national, regional, and global workforce initiatives. DISCUSSION: The African Health Profession Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives convenes leaders responsible for regulation from 14 countries in East, Central and Southern Africa. It provides a high profile, south-to-south collaboration to assist countries in implementing joint approaches to problems affecting the health workforce. Implemented in partnership with Emory University, the Commonwealth Secretariat, and the East, Central and Southern African College of Nursing, this initiative also supports four to five countries per year in implementing locally-designed regulation improvement projects. Over time, the African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives will help to increase the regulatory capacity of health professional organizations and ultimately improve regulation and professional standards in this region of Africa. The African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives will measure the progress of country projects and conduct an annual evaluation of the initiative's regional impact, thereby contributing to the global evidence base of health workforce interventions. CONCLUSION: The African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives is designed to address priority needs in health workforce development and improve regulation of the health workforce. This model may assist others countries and regions facing similar workforce challenges.
BACKGROUND: More than thirty-five sub-Saharan African countries have severe health workforce shortages. Many also struggle with a mismatch between the knowledge and competencies of health professionals and the needs of the populations they serve. Addressing these workforce challenges requires collaboration among health and education stakeholders and reform of health worker regulations. Health professional regulatory bodies, such as nursing and midwifery councils, have the mandate to reform regulations yet often do not have the resources or expertise to do so. In 2011, the United States of America Centers for Disease Control and Prevention began a four-year initiative to increase the collaboration among national stakeholders and help strengthen the capacity of health professional regulatory bodies to reform national regulatory frameworks. The initiative is called the African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives. This article describes the African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives and discusses its importance in implementing and sustaining national, regional, and global workforce initiatives. DISCUSSION: The African Health Profession Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives convenes leaders responsible for regulation from 14 countries in East, Central and Southern Africa. It provides a high profile, south-to-south collaboration to assist countries in implementing joint approaches to problems affecting the health workforce. Implemented in partnership with Emory University, the Commonwealth Secretariat, and the East, Central and Southern African College of Nursing, this initiative also supports four to five countries per year in implementing locally-designed regulation improvement projects. Over time, the African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives will help to increase the regulatory capacity of health professional organizations and ultimately improve regulation and professional standards in this region of Africa. The African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives will measure the progress of country projects and conduct an annual evaluation of the initiative's regional impact, thereby contributing to the global evidence base of health workforce interventions. CONCLUSION: The African Health Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives is designed to address priority needs in health workforce development and improve regulation of the health workforce. This model may assist others countries and regions facing similar workforce challenges.
Beginning with the World Health Report 2000, landmark publications have firmly established the importance of the health workforce in advancing population health [1-6]. The shortage of human resources for health (HRH) in sub-Saharan African countries severely limits the ability of countries to meet national health targets and global health goals [7-9]. Compounding the insufficient number of health workers (defined by the World Health Organization as less than 2.5 health workers per 1000 persons), is the lack of appropriate skills, competencies, and education necessary for this workforce to deliver adequate care to the populations they serve [3,10-12]. In response to these shortcomings, global health policy makers identified regulatory actions, such as professional licensure, continuing professional development (CPD) of health workers, and accreditation of educational institutions as key interventions for strengthening the health workforce in low resource countries [3,10,11,13-15]. Implementing these key regulatory interventions requires collaboration among national stakeholders, including the health worker regulatory bodies, professional associations, and health educators [10,11,13].Guidelines on task-shifting and suggestions for regulatory reform have been provided by the donor community and external policy-making bodies. The collaboration needed to implement this reform is often inadequate [10,11,16]. Furthermore, local health worker regulatory bodies most impacted by these recommendations, such as nursing and medical councils, often lack the capacity, resources, or expertise to enact the suggested reforms [16,17].In 2011 the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) began an innovative four-year initiative to increase the collaboration among national stakeholders and help strengthen the capacity of health professional regulatory bodies to reform national regulatory frameworks. The African Health Profession Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives (ARC) convenes leaders responsible for regulation from 14 countries in East, Central and Southern Africa (Figure 1) for a high profile, local country collaboration to assist countries in implementing joint problem-solving approaches that target national issues affecting the health workforce. The following discussion describes ARC and discusses its importance in implementing and sustaining national, regional, and global workforce initiatives.
Figure 1
Map of countries participating in the African Health Profession Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives (ARC).
Map of countries participating in the African Health Profession Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives (ARC).
The African Health Profession Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives (ARC)
In contrast to top-down guidelines and policy recommendations, the ARC approach to addressing health worker regulation issues begins with supporting country-driven priorities and fostering collaboration among regulation stakeholders. ARC’s framework, based on a proven model for advancements through collaboration, provides a regional forum for countries to share approaches with each other and learn from similar experiences, challenges and successes. It is hoped that south-to-south collaboration of ARC will increase each year as countries funded in earlier cycles share lessons learned with countries experiencing similar workforce challenges. This peer-to-peer learning is designed to create long-term capacity among the regulatory leadership of the ECSA nations. The collaboration among the national regulation stakeholders will also help ensure that improvements to regulation are integrated into key institutions in the health and education sectors which are critical to sustaining health workforce improvements [10,11]. The regional focus of ARC should allow for a rapid scale-up of successful regulatory reform. ARC’s partnership with ECSACON provides a regional platform from which to coordinate and harmonize nursing and midwifery regulation.ARC not only advances regional priorities for nursing and midwifery regulation, but also supports global priorities as articulated by the World Health Organization’s 2011–2015 Strategic Directions for nursing and midwifery, such as collaboration among government, professional, and education stakeholders and reforming nursing and midwifery education and practice regulations [19,20]. Further alignment with global standards and guidelines is ensured through attendance at and participation in ARC meetings by representatives from the International Council of Nurses, the International Confederation of Midwives, the World Health Organization’s Regional Office for Africa, and others. Furthermore, ARC will measure the progress and impact of country projects as well as conduct an annual evaluation of the ARC approach, thereby contributing to the global evidence base of HRH interventions.
Conclusion
Major donor and policy makers have clearly articulated global health workforce priorities requiring collaboration among stakeholders and institutional capacity within health professional regulatory bodies. ARC institutes a country-driven, south-to-south collaborative approach that empowers local and regional regulatory leadership to address issues affecting the largest component of the health workforce in this region. The ARC model for strengthening the nursing and midwifery workforce in East, Central and Southern Africa is adaptable to other health care cadres and other regions struggling with similar health workforce challenges.
Abbreviations
ARC, The African Health Profession Regulatory Collaborative for Nurses and Midwives; CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CPD, continuing professional development; ECSA, East Central and Southern African; ECSACON, East Central and Southern African College of Nursing; HRH, human resources for health; IHI, Institute for Healthcare Improvement.
Authors’ contributions
CM drafted and revised the manuscript. PR provided critical revisions to the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Competing interests
The authors declare they have no competing interests.
Authors: Julio Frenk; Lincoln Chen; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Jordan Cohen; Nigel Crisp; Timothy Evans; Harvey Fineberg; Patricia Garcia; Yang Ke; Patrick Kelley; Barry Kistnasamy; Afaf Meleis; David Naylor; Ariel Pablos-Mendez; Srinath Reddy; Susan Scrimshaw; Jaime Sepulveda; David Serwadda; Huda Zurayk Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Norbert Dreesch; Carmen Dolea; Mario R Dal Poz; Alexandre Goubarev; Orvill Adams; Maru Aregawi; Karin Bergstrom; Helga Fogstad; Della Sheratt; Jennifer Linkins; Robert Scherpbier; Mayada Youssef-Fox Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2005-08-02 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: Mickey Chopra; Joy E Lawn; David Sanders; Peter Barron; Salim S Abdool Karim; Debbie Bradshaw; Rachel Jewkes; Quarraisha Abdool Karim; Alan J Flisher; Bongani M Mayosi; Stephen M Tollman; Gavin J Churchyard; Hoosen Coovadia Journal: Lancet Date: 2009-08-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jack Needleman; Peter Buerhaus; V Shane Pankratz; Cynthia L Leibson; Susanna R Stevens; Marcelline Harris Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lincoln Chen; Timothy Evans; Sudhir Anand; Jo Ivey Boufford; Hilary Brown; Mushtaque Chowdhury; Marcos Cueto; Lola Dare; Gilles Dussault; Gijs Elzinga; Elizabeth Fee; Demissie Habte; Piya Hanvoravongchai; Marian Jacobs; Christoph Kurowski; Sarah Michael; Ariel Pablos-Mendez; Nelson Sewankambo; Giorgio Solimano; Barbara Stilwell; Alex de Waal; Suwit Wibulpolprasert Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Nov 27-Dec 3 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: R Zachariah; N Ford; M Philips; S Lynch; M Massaquoi; V Janssens; A D Harries Journal: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 2.184
Authors: Michelle Dynes; Laura Tison; Carla Johnson; Andre Verani; Alexandra Zuber; Patricia L Riley Journal: J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 1.354
Authors: Maureen A Kelley; Sydney A Spangler; Laura I Tison; Carla M Johnson; Tegan L Callahan; Jill Iliffe; Kenneth W Hepburn; Jessica M Gross Journal: J Nurs Regul Date: 2017-10
Authors: Carey F McCarthy; Jessica M Gross; Andre R Verani; Annette M Nkowane; Erica L Wheeler; Thokozire J Lipato; Maureen A Kelley Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2017-07-24
Authors: Caryl Feldacker; Jillian Pintye; Sheena Jacob; Michael H Chung; Lyn Middleton; Jill Iliffe; H Nina Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jessica M Gross; Carey F McCarthy; Andre R Verani; Jill Iliffe; Maureen A Kelley; Kenneth W Hepburn; Melinda K Higgins; Alphonce T Kalula; Agnes N Waudo; Patricia L Riley Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 2.655