Literature DB >> 22931241

Retrospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted peritoneal drainage for the treatment of septic peritonitis in dogs and cats: 8 cases (2003-2010).

Krista M Cioffi1, Chad W Schmiedt, Karen K Cornell, MaryAnn G Radlinsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of vacuum-assisted peritoneal drainage (VAPD) in dogs and cats with septic peritonitis.
DESIGN: Retrospective descriptive study.
SETTING: University Veterinary Teaching Hospital. ANIMALS: Six dogs and 2 cats with septic peritonitis.
INTERVENTIONS: Application of VAPD after abdominal exploration. MEASUREMENTS: Pre- and post-operative physical and clinicopathologic data, surgical findings, treatment, VAPD fluid production, outcome, and survival are reported. MAIN
RESULTS: Eight nonconsecutive cases of septic peritonitis, consisting of 6 dogs and 2 cats, were treated surgically and had VAPD applied post-operatively. The mean duration of clinical signs prior to surgical intervention was 4 ± 3 days. VAPD therapy was applied for a mean of 2 ± 1.1 days and collected a median of 27 mL/kg/d of abdominal effusate. The median time in hospital was 5 days and abdominal closure was completed in 5 of the 8 patients. All specimens collected at surgery cultured positive for bacteria, most commonly Enterococcus spp. The peritoneum of 4 animals was cultured at the time of abdominal closure; 1 was negative and 3 were positive for Escherichia coli, Enterococcus spp. or gram-positive cocci. Cultures before and after surgery differed in 2 patients. Hypoproteinemia was present in all patients postoperatively. Three patients were considered survivors, all of which were dogs. Five patients died or were euthanized due to cardiopulmonary arrest (n = 3), pyothorax (n = 1), and acute, severe, septic peritonitis (n = 1).
CONCLUSIONS: VAPD is available for maintaining abdominal drainage for the treatment of septic peritonitis after surgical intervention; however, similar to open abdominal drainage and closed suction drainage, nosocomial infection and hypoproteinemia remain challenges in the treatment of septic peritonitis. © Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22931241     DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-4431.2012.00791.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio)        ISSN: 1476-4431


  5 in total

1.  Successful management of jejunojejunal anastomosis dehiscence by extra-abdominal exteriorization and bandaging in a cat with septic peritonitis.

Authors:  Emmanouil Tzimtzimis; Maria Kouki; Stefania Rampidi; Matina Giannikaki; Georgia Karnezi; Lysimachos G Papazoglou
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.008

Review 2.  Filling the vacuum: Role of negative pressure wound therapy in open wound management in cats.

Authors:  Mirja C Nolff
Journal:  J Feline Med Surg       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 2.015

3.  Benign Duodenal Stricture Treated with Surgical Correction and Dietary Therapy in a Golden Retriever.

Authors:  John C Rowe; Alice A Huang; Jin Heo; Nolie K Parnell; Adam J Rudinsky
Journal:  Case Rep Vet Med       Date:  2020-04-06

4.  A Randomized Controlled Trial on Intra-Abdominal Irrigation during Emergency Trauma Laparotomy; Time for Yet Another Paradigm Shift.

Authors:  Hassan Mashbari; Mohannad Hemdi; Kevin L Chow; James C Doherty; Gary J Merlotti; Steven L Salzman; Eduardo Smith Singares
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-04

Review 5.  Barium peritonitis in small animals.

Authors:  Jae Jin Ko; F A Tony Mann
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 1.267

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.