Literature DB >> 22930747

Genome-wide methylation screen in low-grade breast cancer identifies novel epigenetically altered genes as potential biomarkers for tumor diagnosis.

Marta Faryna1, Carolin Konermann, Sebastian Aulmann, Justo Lorenzo Bermejo, Markus Brugger, Sven Diederichs, Joachim Rom, Dieter Weichenhan, Rainer Claus, Michael Rehli, Peter Schirmacher, Hans-Peter Sinn, Christoph Plass, Clarissa Gerhauser.   

Abstract

Aberrant DNA methylation constitutes a well-established epigenetic marker for breast cancer. Changes in methylation early in cancer development may be clinically relevant for cancer detection and prognosis-based therapeutic decisions. In the present study, a combination of methyl-CpG immunoprecipitation (MCIp) and human CpG island (CGI) arrays was applied to compare genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in 10 low-grade in situ and invasive breast cancers against 10 normal breast samples. In total, 214 CGIs were found to be hypermethylated in ≥6 of 10 tumors. Functional term enrichment analyses revealed an overrepresentation of homeobox genes and genes involved in transcription and regulation of transcription. Significant hypermethylation of 11 selected genes in tumor vs. normal tissue was validated in two independent sample sets (45 tumors and 11 controls, 43 tumors and 8 controls) using quantitative EpiTyper technology. In tumors, median methylation levels of BCAN, HOXD1, KCTD8, KLF11, NXPH1, POU4F1, SIM1, and TCF7L1 were ≥30% higher than in normal samples, representing potential biomarkers for tumor diagnosis. Using the 90th percentile of methylation levels in normal tissue as cutoff value, 62-92% of in situ samples (n=13), 72-97% of invasive samples from the first validation set (n=32), and 86-100% of invasive samples from the second validation set (n=43) were classified as hypermethylated. Hypermethylation of KLF11 and SIM1 might also be associated with increased risk of developing metastases. In summary, early methylation changes are frequent in the low-grade pathway of breast cancer and may be useful in the development of differential diagnostic and possibly also prognostic markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22930747     DOI: 10.1096/fj.12-209502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  38 in total

1.  Validation of DNA promoter hypermethylation biomarkers in breast cancer--a short report.

Authors:  Jolien S de Groot; Xiaojuan Pan; Jan Meeldijk; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest; Cathy B Moelans
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 6.730

2.  Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in progression to in situ and invasive carcinoma of the breast with impact on gene transcription and prognosis.

Authors:  Thomas Fleischer; Arnoldo Frigessi; Kevin C Johnson; Hege Edvardsen; Nizar Touleimat; Jovana Klajic; Margit Lh Riis; Vilde D Haakensen; Fredrik Wärnberg; Bjørn Naume; Aslaug Helland; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Jörg Tost; Brock C Christensen; Vessela N Kristensen
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 13.583

3.  Krüppel-like factor 5 as potential molecular marker in cervical cancer and the KLF family profile expression.

Authors:  Daniel Marrero-Rodríguez; Keiko Taniguchi-Ponciano; Florinda Jimenez-Vega; Pablo Romero-Morelos; Monica Mendoza-Rodríguez; Alejandra Mantilla; Miriam Rodriguez-Esquivel; Daniel Hernandez; Angeles Hernandez; Guillermo Gomez-Gutierrez; Nancy Muñoz-Hernandez; Hugo Arreola-de la Cruz; Claudia Vargas-Requena; Cecilia Díaz-Hernández; Luis Serna-Reyna; Marco Meraz-Rios; Cindy Bandala; Jorge Ortiz-Leon; Mauricio Salcedo
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-08-15

4.  Pathways of aging: comparative analysis of gene signatures in replicative senescence and stress induced premature senescence.

Authors:  Kamil C Kural; Neetu Tandon; Mikhail Skoblov; Olga V Kel-Margoulis; Ancha V Baranova
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 5.  Krüppel-like factors in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Jie Lu; Yan Shi; Jin-Lian Chen; Shijie Ma
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-06

Review 6.  Role of Krüppel-like factors in cancer stem cells.

Authors:  Yueling Zhang; Jin Hao; Yingcheng Zheng; Dian Jing; Yu Shen; Jun Wang; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  J Physiol Biochem       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.158

Review 7.  The emerging role of the KCTD proteins in cancer.

Authors:  Annapaola Angrisani; Annamaria Di Fiore; Enrico De Smaele; Marta Moretti
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 5.712

8.  Methylated biomarkers for breast cancer identified through public database analysis and plasma target capture sequencing.

Authors:  Can Luo; Jiaheng Huang; Zhaoze Guo; Jingyun Guo; Xiaoqi Zeng; Yimin Li; Minfeng Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

Review 9.  DNA methylation in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.

Authors:  Jia-Min B Pang; Alexander Dobrovic; Stephen B Fox
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  COHCAP: an integrative genomic pipeline for single-nucleotide resolution DNA methylation analysis.

Authors:  Charles D Warden; Heehyoung Lee; Joshua D Tompkins; Xiaojin Li; Charles Wang; Arthur D Riggs; Hua Yu; Richard Jove; Yate-Ching Yuan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.