Literature DB >> 22930523

Whole mount nuclear fluorescent imaging: convenient documentation of embryo morphology.

Lisa L Sandell1, Hiroshi Kurosaka, Paul A Trainor.   

Abstract

Here, we describe a relatively inexpensive and easy method to produce high quality images that reveal fine topological details of vertebrate embryonic structures. The method relies on nuclear staining of whole mount embryos in combination with confocal microscopy or conventional wide field fluorescent microscopy. In cases where confocal microscopy is used in combination with whole mount nuclear staining, the resulting embryo images can rival the clarity and resolution of images produced by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The fluorescent nuclear staining may be performed with a variety of cell permeable nuclear dyes, enabling the technique to be performed with multiple standard microscope/illumination or confocal/laser systems. The method may be used to document morphology of embryos of a variety of organisms, as well as individual organs and tissues. Nuclear stain imaging imposes minimal impact on embryonic specimens, enabling imaged specimens to be utilized for additional assays.
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22930523      PMCID: PMC3504639          DOI: 10.1002/dvg.22344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genesis        ISSN: 1526-954X            Impact factor:   2.487


  8 in total

1.  Confocal laser scanning microscopy of morphology and apoptosis in organogenesis-stage mouse embryos.

Authors:  R M Zucker; E S Hunter; J M Rogers
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  Preparation of fixed Xenopus embryos for confocal imaging.

Authors:  John B Wallingford
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2010-05

3.  Whole insect and mammalian embryo imaging with confocal microscopy: morphology and apoptosis.

Authors:  Robert M Zucker
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 4.355

4.  A phenotype-driven ENU mutagenesis screen identifies novel alleles with functional roles in early mouse craniofacial development.

Authors:  Lisa L Sandell; Angelo Iulianella; Kristin R Melton; Megan Lynn; Macie Walker; Kimberly E Inman; Shachi Bhatt; Margot Leroux-Berger; Michelle Crawford; Natalie C Jones; Jennifer F Dennis; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 2.487

5.  A SHH-responsive signaling center in the forebrain regulates craniofacial morphogenesis via the facial ectoderm.

Authors:  Diane Hu; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Development       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 6.868

6.  Generating transparent zebrafish: a refined method to improve detection of gene expression during embryonic development.

Authors:  J Karlsson; J von Hofsten; P E Olsson
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Patterned acquisition of skin barrier function during development.

Authors:  M J Hardman; P Sisi; D N Banbury; C Byrne
Journal:  Development       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  RDH10 oxidation of Vitamin A is a critical control step in synthesis of retinoic acid during mouse embryogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa L Sandell; Megan L Lynn; Kimberly E Inman; William McDowell; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total
  22 in total

1.  Formin homology 2 domain-containing 3 (Fhod3) controls neural plate morphogenesis in mouse cranial neurulation by regulating multidirectional apical constriction.

Authors:  Hikmawan Wahyu Sulistomo; Takayuki Nemoto; Toshihiko Yanagita; Ryu Takeya
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Trim33 is required for appropriate development of pre-cardiogenic mesoderm.

Authors:  Sudha Rajderkar; Jeffrey M Mann; Christopher Panaretos; Kenji Yumoto; Hong-Dong Li; Yuji Mishina; Benjamin Ralston; Vesa Kaartinen
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 3.582

3.  MicroRNA expression profiling of the developing murine upper lip.

Authors:  Dennis R Warner; Partha Mukhopadhyay; Guy Brock; Cindy L Webb; M Michele Pisano; Robert M Greene
Journal:  Dev Growth Differ       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.053

4.  Cochleovestibular nerve development is integrated with migratory neural crest cells.

Authors:  Lisa L Sandell; Naomi E Butler Tjaden; Amanda J Barlow; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Chicken trunk neural crest migration visualized with HNK1.

Authors:  Dion Giovannone; Blanca Ortega; Michelle Reyes; Nancy El-Ghali; Maes Rabadi; Sothy Sao; Maria Elena de Bellard
Journal:  Acta Histochem       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.479

6.  Foxi transcription factors promote pharyngeal arch development by regulating formation of FGF signaling centers.

Authors:  Renée K Edlund; Takahiro Ohyama; Husniye Kantarci; Bruce B Riley; Andrew K Groves
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  A quantitative method for defining high-arched palate using the Tcof1(+/-) mutant mouse as a model.

Authors:  Zachary R Conley; Molly Hague; Hiroshi Kurosaka; Jill Dixon; Michael J Dixon; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Disrupting hedgehog and WNT signaling interactions promotes cleft lip pathogenesis.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kurosaka; Angelo Iulianella; Trevor Williams; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Requirement of Hyaluronan Synthase-2 in Craniofacial and Palate Development.

Authors:  Y Lan; C Qin; R Jiang
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 6.116

10.  Foxc2 is required for proper cardiac neural crest cell migration, outflow tract septation, and ventricle expansion.

Authors:  Kimberly E Inman; Carlo Donato Caiaffa; Kristin R Melton; Lisa L Sandell; Annita Achilleos; Tsutomu Kume; Paul A Trainor
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.780

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.