Literature DB >> 22930399

Validation of terminal peptide of procollagen III for the detection and assessment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Sudeep Tanwar1, Paul M Trembling, Indra N Guha, Julie Parkes, Philip Kaye, Alastair D Burt, Stephen D Ryder, Guruprasad P Aithal, Christopher P Day, William M Rosenberg.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Liver biopsy is the reference standard for the detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) within nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The aim of this study was to identify a biomarker of NASH in patients without significant fibrosis. In all, 172 patients from two centers with biopsy-proven NAFLD were included in this study. Eighty-four patients from a single center were included as a derivation cohort and 88 patients from a second center were included as a validation cohort. Serum samples were tested for candidate markers of fibrosis and inflammation alongside hematological and biochemical markers. Among patients without advanced fibrosis, terminal peptide of procollagen III (PIIINP) was the only marker found to be associated with a histological diagnosis of NASH in both cohorts. PIIINP also correlated with the total NAFLD activity score (NAS) and its constituent components (P < 0.001). Area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for PIIINP in discriminating between NASH and simple steatosis (SS) was 0.77-0.82 in patients with F0-2 fibrosis and 0.82-0.84 in patients with F0-3 fibrosis. PIIINP was elevated in patients with advanced fibrosis, the overwhelming majority of whom had NASH. When incorporating patients with all degrees of fibrosis from both cohorts, PIIINP was able to discriminate between patients with SS and those with NASH or advanced fibrosis with AUROC 0.85-0.87.
CONCLUSION: PIIINP discriminates between SS and NASH or advanced fibrosis. The use of a single biomarker in this context will be of clinical utility in detecting the minority of patients with NAFLD who have NASH or advanced fibrosis related to NASH.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22930399     DOI: 10.1002/hep.26030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  31 in total

1.  Methods to improve the noninvasive diagnosis and assessment of disease severity in children with suspected nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): Study design.

Authors:  Bryan Rudolph; Nicole Bjorklund; Nadia Ovchinsky; Debora Kogan-Liberman; Adriana Perez; Mark Liszewski; Terry L Levin; Michelle Ewart; Qiang Liu; Xiaonan Xue; Shankar Viswanathan; Howard D Strickler
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  NonInvasive Biomarkers in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Shivaram P Singh; Rakesh K Barik
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-09-21

Review 3.  Fibrosis Assessment in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) in 2016.

Authors:  Dharmesh H Kaswala; Michelle Lai; Nezam H Afdhal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Ameliorative effects of glycine in an experimental nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and its correlation between TREM-1 and TREM-2.

Authors:  Zhang-Feng Dou; Ya-Rong Guo; Jin-Chun Liu; Ning Li; Bao Chai; Xiu-Qing Li; Rong Fu; Xiao-Juan Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Diagnostic modalities for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, and associated fibrosis.

Authors:  Zobair M Younossi; Rohit Loomba; Quentin M Anstee; Mary E Rinella; Elisabetta Bugianesi; Giulio Marchesini; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Lawrence Serfaty; Francesco Negro; Stephen H Caldwell; Vlad Ratziu; Kathleen E Corey; Scott L Friedman; Manal F Abdelmalek; Stephen A Harrison; Arun J Sanyal; Joel E Lavine; Philippe Mathurin; Michael R Charlton; Zachary D Goodman; Naga P Chalasani; Kris V Kowdley; Jacob George; Keith Lindor
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 6.  Non-invasive diagnosis of advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Authors:  Suraj Sharma; Korosh Khalili; Geoffrey Christopher Nguyen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Does a calculated "NAFLD fibrosis score" reliably negate the need for liver biopsy in patients undergoing bariatric surgery?

Authors:  Kerri A Simo; Iain H McKillop; Matthew T McMillan; William A Ahrens; Amanda L Walters; Kyle J Thompson; Timothy S Kuwada; John B Martinie; David A Iannitti; Keith S Gersin; David Sindram
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: updates in noninvasive diagnosis and correlation with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Kuang-Chun Hu; Horng-Yuan Wang; Sung-Chen Liu; Chuan-Chuan Liu; Chung-Lieh Hung; Ming-Jong Bair; Chun-Jen Liu; Ming-Shiang Wu; Shou-Chuan Shih
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Non-invasive Testing for NASH and NASH with Advanced Fibrosis: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Ahilan Arulanandan; Rohit Loomba
Journal:  Curr Hepatol Rep       Date:  2015-04-22

Review 10.  Diagnostic management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a transformational period in the development of diagnostic and predictive tools-a narrative review.

Authors:  Natalia Rosso; Adam M Stephenson; Pablo J Giraudi; Claudio Tiribelli
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.