Literature DB >> 22930007

Peripheral vision benefits spatial learning by guiding eye movements.

Naohide Yamamoto1, John W Philbeck.   

Abstract

The loss of peripheral vision impairs spatial learning and navigation. However, the mechanisms underlying these impairments remain poorly understood. One advantage of having peripheral vision is that objects in an environment are easily detected and readily foveated via eye movements. The present study examined this potential benefit of peripheral vision by investigating whether competent performance in spatial learning requires effective eye movements. In Experiment 1, participants learned room-sized spatial layouts with or without restriction on direct eye movements to objects. Eye movements were restricted by having participants view the objects through small apertures in front of their eyes. Results showed that impeding effective eye movements made subsequent retrieval of spatial memory slower and less accurate. The small apertures also occluded much of the environmental surroundings, but the importance of this kind of occlusion was ruled out in Experiment 2 by showing that participants exhibited intact learning of the same spatial layouts when luminescent objects were viewed in an otherwise dark room. Together, these findings suggest that one of the roles of peripheral vision in spatial learning is to guide eye movements, highlighting the importance of spatial information derived from eye movements for learning environmental layouts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22930007     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0240-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  28 in total

1.  Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon.

Authors:  T L Ooi; B Wu; Z J He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Losing sight of the bigger picture: peripheral field loss compresses representations of space.

Authors:  Francesca C Fortenbaugh; John C Hicks; Lei Hao; Kathleen A Turano
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Saccade deficits after a unilateral lesion affecting the superior colliculus.

Authors:  C Pierrot-Deseilligny; A Rosa; K Masmoudi; S Rivaud; B Gaymard
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Exploring the third dimension with eye movements: better than stereopsis.

Authors:  J T Enright
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions.

Authors:  J W Philbeck; J M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Latencies of visually guided saccades in unilateral hemispheric cerebral lesions.

Authors:  C Pierrot-Deseilligny; S Rivaud; C Penet; M H Rigolet
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 10.422

7.  Abnormal ocular movements in Parkinson's disease. Evidence for involvement of dopaminergic systems.

Authors:  O Rascol; M Clanet; J L Montastruc; M Simonetta; M J Soulier-Esteve; B Doyon; A Rascol
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Differential impairment of spatial location memory in Huntington's disease.

Authors:  J Brandt; B Shpritz; C A Munro; L Marsh; A Rosenblatt
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Visual factors and orientation-mobility performance.

Authors:  J A Marron; I L Bailey
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1982-05

10.  Restricting the field of view: perceptual and performance effects.

Authors:  P L Alfano; G F Michel
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1990-02
View more
  9 in total

1.  Does active learning benefit spatial memory during navigation with restricted peripheral field?

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Effects of simulated mild vision loss on gaze, driving and interaction behaviors in pedestrian crossing situations.

Authors:  Christian Lehsing; Florian Ruch; Felix M Kölsch; Georg N Dyszak; Christian Haag; Ilja T Feldstein; Steven W Savage; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2019-02-10

3.  The Effects of Restricted Peripheral Field-of-View on Spatial Learning while Navigating.

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Adaptive Gaze Strategies for Locomotion with Constricted Visual Field.

Authors:  Colas N Authié; Alain Berthoz; José-Alain Sahel; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  The effects of age and cognitive load on peripheral-detection performance.

Authors:  Steven W Savage; Lauren P Spano; Alex R Bowers
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Navigating with peripheral field loss in a museum: learning impairments due to environmental complexity.

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-10-22

Review 7.  How can basic research on spatial cognition enhance the visual accessibility of architecture for people with low vision?

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr; Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Margaret R Tarampi; Kristina M Rand; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-01-07

8.  Functional Field of View Determined by Crowding, Aging, or Glaucoma Under Divided Attention.

Authors:  Foroogh Shamsi; Victoria Chen; Rong Liu; Valentina Pergher; MiYoung Kwon
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Indoor Spatial Updating with Reduced Visual Information.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Rachel Gage; Yihwa Baek; Tiana M Bochsler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.