Literature DB >> 22929590

Orthographic processing is universal; it's what you do with it that's different.

Dennis Norris1, Sachiko Kinoshita.   

Abstract

We agree with Frost that the variety of orthographies in the world's languages complicates the task of "cracking the orthographic code." Frost suggests that orthographic processing must therefore differ between orthographies. We suggest that the same basic orthographic processes are applied to all languages. Where languages differ is in what the reader must do with the results of orthographic processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22929590     DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X12000106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  5 in total

1.  Parafoveal letter-position coding in reading.

Authors:  Joshua Snell; Daisy Bertrand; Jonathan Grainger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

2.  What can we learn from learning models about sensitivity to letter-order in visual word recognition?

Authors:  Itamar Lerner; Blair C Armstrong; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  The flexibility of letter-position flexibility: evidence from eye movements in reading Hebrew.

Authors:  Hadas Velan; Avital Deutsch; Ram Frost
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Transposed letter priming effects and allographic variation in Arabic: Insights from lexical decision and the same-different task.

Authors:  Sami Boudelaa; Dennis Norris; Abdesattar Mahfoudhi; Sachiko Kinoshita
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Task-dependent masked priming effects in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Sachiko Kinoshita; Dennis Norris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-06-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.