Literature DB >> 22928658

Gender differences in the incentive salience of adult and infant faces.

Amanda C Hahn1, Dengke Xiao, Reiner Sprengelmeyer, David I Perrett.   

Abstract

Facial appearance can motivate behaviour and elicit activation of brain circuits putatively involved in reward. Gender differences have been observed for motivation to view beauty in adult faces--heterosexual women are motivated by beauty in general, while heterosexual men are motivated to view opposite-sex beauty alone. Although gender differences have been observed in sensitivity to infant cuteness, infant faces appear to hold equal incentive salience among men and women. In the present study, we investigated the incentive salience of attractiveness and cuteness in adult and infant faces, respectively. We predicted that, given alternative viewing options, gender differences would emerge for motivation to view infant faces. Heterosexual participants completed a "pay-per-view" key-press task, which allowed them to control stimulus duration. Gender differences were found such that infants held greater incentive salience among women, although both sexes differentiated infant faces based on cuteness. Among adult faces, men exerted more effort than women to view opposite-sex faces. These findings suggest that, contrary to previous reports, gender differences do exist in the incentive salience of infant faces as well as opposite-sex faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22928658     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.705860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  19 in total

1.  Reported maternal tendencies predict the reward value of infant facial cuteness, but not cuteness detection.

Authors:  Amanda C Hahn; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Facial perception of infants with cleft lip and palate with/without the NAM appliance.

Authors:  A Quast; J Waschkau; J Saptschak; N Daratsianos; K Jordan; P Fromberger; J L Müller; P Meyer-Marcotty
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 3.  On Cuteness: Unlocking the Parental Brain and Beyond.

Authors:  Morten L Kringelbach; Eloise A Stark; Catherine Alexander; Marc H Bornstein; Alan Stein
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Preference for cute infants does not depend on their ethnicity or species: evidence from hypothetical adoption and donation paradigms.

Authors:  Jessika Golle; Fabian Probst; Fred W Mast; Janek S Lobmaier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Neural systems and hormones mediating attraction to infant and child faces.

Authors:  Lizhu Luo; Xiaole Ma; Xiaoxiao Zheng; Weihua Zhao; Lei Xu; Benjamin Becker; Keith M Kendrick
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-17

6.  Using eye tracking to test for individual differences in attention to attractive faces.

Authors:  Christian Valuch; Lena S Pflüger; Bernard Wallner; Bruno Laeng; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-02

7.  The Power of Smiling: The Adult Brain Networks Underlying Learned Infant Emotionality.

Authors:  Eloise A Stark; Joana Cabral; Madelon M E Riem; Marinus H Van IJzendoorn; Alan Stein; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Aesthetic and incentive salience of cute infant faces: studies of observer sex, oral contraception and menstrual cycle.

Authors:  Reiner Sprengelmeyer; Jennifer Lewis; Amanda Hahn; David I Perrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effects of Gender and Personality on First Impression.

Authors:  Katia Mattarozzi; Alexander Todorov; Michele Marzocchi; Alba Vicari; Paolo Maria Russo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sex ratio influences the motivational salience of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Amanda C Hahn; Claire I Fisher; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.