| Literature DB >> 22928579 |
Flora Tzelepis1, Christine L Paul, Raoul A Walsh, John Wiggers, Sarah L Duncan, Jenny Knight.
Abstract
AIMS: Active recruitment of smokers increases the reach of quitlines; however, some quitlines restrict proactive telephone counselling (i.e. counsellor-initiated calls) to smokers ready to quit within 30 days. Identifying characteristics associated with successful quitting by actively recruited smokers could help to distinguish those most likely to benefit from proactive telephone counselling. This study assessed the baseline characteristics of actively recruited smokers associated with prolonged abstinence at 4, 7 and 13 months and the proportion achieving prolonged abstinence that would miss out on proactive telephone counselling if such support was offered only to smokers intending to quit within 30 days at baseline.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22928579 PMCID: PMC3563228 DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03998.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Addiction ISSN: 0965-2140 Impact factor: 6.526
Significant predictors of prolonged abstinence (i.e. at least 3, 6, 9 or 12 months’ abstinence) at 4, 7 and 13 months post-recruitment
| Short-term assessment | Mid-term-assessment | Long-term assessment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-month prolonged abstinence at 4 months | 3-month prolonged abstinence at 7 months | 6-month prolonged abstinence at 7 months | 6-month prolonged abstinence at 13 months | 9-month prolonged abstinence at 13 months | 12-month prolonged abstinence at 13 months | |
| 39/1303 | 81/1221 | 24/1219 | 86/1187 | 52/1159 | 17/1237 | |
| Baseline characteristics | Odds ratio (95% CIs) | Odds ratio (95% CIs) | Odds ratio (95% CIs) | Odds ratio (95% CIs) | Odds ratio (95% CIs) | Odds ratio (95% CIs) |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Married/ | Referent | |||||
| Divorced/separated | 0.3 (0.1–0.8) | |||||
| Widowed | 1.1 (0.2–5.2) | |||||
| Never married | 0.5 (0.2–1.1) | |||||
| Employment status | ||||||
| Paid employment | 2.4 (1.1–5.3) | |||||
| No paid employment | Referent | |||||
| Time to first cigarette (minutes) | ||||||
| 1–30 | Referent | Referent | Referent | Referent | Referent | |
| 31–60 | 1.2 (0.5–3.1) | 1.5 (0.8–2.8) | 1.0 (0.3–3.5) | 1.8 (1.03–3.2) | 1.1 (0.2–5.0) | |
| 61+ | 2.8 (1.3–6.0) | 2.2 (1.2–3.9) | 3.0 (1.2–7.8) | 2.0 (1.1–3.5) | 3.9 (1.4–11.3) | |
| Quitting intention | ||||||
| Within 30 days | 3.0 (1.3–7.3) | 2.6 (1.4–4.8) | 3.4 (1.1–10.9) | 2.4 (1.3–4.5) | 3.7 (1.5–8.7) | |
| Within 6 months | 1.2 (0.5–3.0) | 1.2 (0.7–2.3) | 1.3 (0.4–4.5) | 1.7 (0.9–3.2) | 2.3 (1.0–5.4) | |
| Not within 6 months | Referent | Referent | Referent | Referent | Referent | |
| Other household smokers | ||||||
| Yes | 1.8 (1.1–3.0) | |||||
| No | Referent | |||||
| Friends/acquaintances smoke | ||||||
| At least half | Referent | |||||
| Fewer than half | 1.5 (0.9–2.5) | |||||
| None | 2.5 (1.1–5.4) | |||||
| Perceived effectiveness of willpower alone | ||||||
| Not at all effective | Referent | Referent | ||||
| Partly effective | 0.5 (0.3–0.98) | 0.6 (0.3–0.99) | ||||
| Definitely effective | 1.4 (0.8–2.4) | 1.4(0.8–2.4) | ||||
| Don't know | 1.1 (0.1–8.7) | 0.9 (0.1–7.3) | ||||
| Alcohol consumption | ||||||
| Don't drink alcohol | 0.7 (0.3–1.6) | 0.8 (0.3–2.4) | 1.0 (0.3–3.7) | |||
| Daily | 0.5 (0.2–1.3) | 0.6 (0.2–1.9) | 1.1 (0.3–3.7) | |||
| Weekly | 0.3 (0.1–0.6) | 0.2 (0.1–0.6) | 0.2 (0.03–0.8) | |||
| Less than weekly | Referent | Referent | Referent | |||
| Treatment condition | ||||||
| Proactive telephone counselling | 2.6 (1.1–6.3) | |||||
| Control | Referent | |||||
| Pseudo | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| Hosmer & Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test ( | 0.09 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.9 | 0.8 |
Based on the observations used by the logistic regression. Observations deleted due to missing values are not included in the numerator or denominator.
The Hosmer & Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test suggested that each backward stepwise logistic regression model fitted the data well. CI: confidence interval.
P < 0.05.