Literature DB >> 22928521

Identity-based inhibitory processing during focused attention.

Liana Machado1, Hayley Guiney, Philippa Struthers.   

Abstract

Recent data suggest that the operating principles governing inhibition of distractor-related activity may deviate from dominant models describing inhibitory processing during selective attention. Here we aimed to gain a better understanding of these data in order to determine whether they actually defy premises of current models. In addition to providing evidence against noninhibitory accounts of the data (see especially Experiment 6), the results support three main novel findings that challenge current theories. First, the data provide evidence that inhibition overpowered excitation from ongoing external input (Experiments 1-4), which suggests that inhibitory control processes are more powerful than current models indicate. Second, negative effects emerged even when targets appeared alone (Experiment 5), which suggests that selection does not play an essential role in triggering inhibitory processing. Third, relatively early distractor-related activity was affected, which supports a role for inhibition prior to action control (Experiment 3). These findings suggest a need to revise current models describing inhibition of distracting information during selective attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22928521     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.701651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  7 in total

1.  The time course of distractor-based response activation with predictable and unpredictable target onset.

Authors:  Kerstin Jost; Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Andreas Löw; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-02-02

2.  Response priming with motion primes: negative compatibility or congruency effects, even in free-choice trials.

Authors:  Christina Bermeitinger; Ryan P Hackländer
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-02-24

3.  Auditory conflict resolution correlates with medial-lateral frontal theta/alpha phase synchrony.

Authors:  Samantha Huang; Stephanie Rossi; Matti Hämäläinen; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Conflict resolution in the Eriksen flanker task: Similarities and differences to the Simon task.

Authors:  Ronald Hübner; Lisa Töbel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Behavioral and Neural Changes Induced by a Blended Essential Oil on Human Selective Attention.

Authors:  Jieqiong Liu; Shi Cai; Danni Chen; Ke Wu; Yang Liu; Ruqian Zhang; Mei Chen; Xianchun Li
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 3.342

6.  Evidence inhibition responds reactively to the salience of distracting information during focused attention.

Authors:  Natalie Wyatt; Liana Machado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Altered inhibitory control and increased sensitivity to cross-modal interference in tinnitus during auditory and visual tasks.

Authors:  Rodrigo Araneda; Anne G De Volder; Naïma Deggouj; Laurent Renier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.