Literature DB >> 22927027

The psychologist said quickly, "dialogue descriptions modulate reading speed!".

Mallory C Stites1, Steven G Luke, Kiel Christianson.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated whether the semantic content of a dialogue description can affect reading times on an embedded quote, to determine whether the speed at which a character is described as saying a quote influences how quickly it is read. Yao and Scheepers (Cognition, 121:447-453, 2011) previously found that readers were faster to read direct quotes when the preceding context implied that the talker generally spoke quickly, an effect attributed to perceptual simulation of talker speed. For the present study, we manipulated the speed of a physical action performed by the speaker independently from character talking rate to determine whether these sources have separable effects on perceptual simulation of a direct quote. The results showed that readers spent less time reading direct quotes described as being said quickly, as compared to those described as being said slowly (e.g., John walked/bolted into the room and said energetically/nonchalantly, "I finally found my car keys."), an effect that was not present when a nearly identical phrase was presented as an indirect quote (e.g., John . . . said energetically that he finally found his car keys.). The speed of the character's movement did not affect direct-quote reading times. Furthermore, fast adverbs were themselves read significantly faster than slow adverbs, an effect that we attribute to implicit effects on the eye movement program stemming from automatically activated semantic features of the adverbs. Our findings add to the literature on perceptual simulation by showing that these effects can be instantiated with only a single adverb and are strong enough to override the effects of global sentence speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22927027      PMCID: PMC3540141          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0248-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  13 in total

Review 1.  Perceptual symbol systems.

Authors:  L W Barsalou
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Seeing what they read and hearing what they say: readers' representation of the story characters' world.

Authors:  Celia M Klin; April M Drumm
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

3.  The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading.

Authors:  Jane Ashby; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-03-16

4.  Motor resonance and linguistic focus.

Authors:  Lawrence J Taylor; Rolf A Zwaan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  When story characters communicate: readers' representations of characters' linguistic exchanges.

Authors:  April M Drumm; Celia M Klin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

6.  Silent reading of direct versus indirect speech activates voice-selective areas in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Bo Yao; Pascal Belin; Christoph Scheepers
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Grounding language in action.

Authors:  Arthur M Glenberg; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

8.  The time course of anticipatory constraint integration.

Authors:  Anuenue Kukona; Shin-Yi Fang; Karen A Aicher; Helen Chen; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-01-14

9.  Contextual modulation of reading rate for direct versus indirect speech quotations.

Authors:  Bo Yao; Christoph Scheepers
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-09-08

10.  Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex.

Authors:  Olaf Hauk; Ingrid Johnsrude; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  4 in total

1.  To Dash or to Dawdle: Verb-Associated Speed of Motion Influences Eye Movements during Spoken Sentence Comprehension.

Authors:  Shane Lindsay; Christoph Scheepers; Yuki Kamide
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Mental Simulations of Phonological Representations Are Causally Linked to Silent Reading of Direct Versus Indirect Speech.

Authors:  Bo Yao
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-01-08

3.  The influence of direct and indirect speech on mental representations.

Authors:  Anita Eerland; Jan A A Engelen; Rolf A Zwaan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Processing Preference Toward Object-Extracted Relative Clauses in Mandarin Chinese by L1 and L2 Speakers: An Eye-Tracking Study.

Authors:  Yao-Ting Sung; Jung-Yueh Tu; Jih-Ho Cha; Ming-Da Wu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.