Literature DB >> 22926724

Predator hunting mode influences patterns of prey use from grazing and epigeic food webs.

Gina M Wimp1, Shannon M Murphy, Danny Lewis, Margaret R Douglas, Ramya Ambikapathi, Lie'Ann Van-Tull, Claudio Gratton, Robert F Denno.   

Abstract

Multichannel omnivory by generalist predators, especially the use of both grazing and epigeic prey, has the potential to increase predator abundance and decrease herbivore populations. However, predator use of the epigeic web (soil surface detritus/microbe/algae consumers) varies considerably for reasons that are poorly understood. We therefore used a stable isotope approach to determine whether prey availability and predator hunting style (active hunting vs. passive web-building) impacted the degree of multichannel omnivory by the two most abundant predators on an intertidal salt marsh, both spiders. We found that carbon isotopic values of herbivores remained constant during the growing season, while values for epigeic feeders became dramatically more enriched such that values for the two webs converged in August. Carbon isotopic values for both spider species remained midway between the two webs as values for epigeic feeders shifted, indicating substantial use of prey from both food webs by both spider species. As the season progressed, prey abundance in the grazing food web increased while prey abundance in the epigeic web remained constant or declined. In response, prey consumption by the web-building spider shifted toward the grazing web to a much greater extent than did consumption by the hunting spider, possibly because passive web-capture is more responsive to changes in prey availability. Although both generalist predator species engaged in multichannel omnivory, hunting mode influenced the extent to which these predators used prey from the grazing and epigeic food webs, and could thereby influence the strength of trophic cascades in both food webs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926724     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2435-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

Review 1.  Can generalist predators be effective biocontrol agents?

Authors:  W O C Symondson; K D Sunderland; M H Greenstone
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Growth of a salt marsh invertebrate on several species of marsh grass detritus.

Authors:  A M Agnew; D H Shull; R Buchsbaum
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.818

3.  Combining sources in stable isotope mixing models: alternative methods.

Authors:  Donald L Phillips; Seth D Newsome; Jillian W Gregg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Habitat provisioning for aboveground predators decreases detritivores.

Authors:  Tadashi Miyashita; Mayura Takada
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Predator diversity and trophic interactions.

Authors:  Oswald J Schmitz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs.

Authors:  K S McCann; J B Rasmussen; J Umbanhowar
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Uncertainty in source partitioning using stable isotopes.

Authors:  Donald L Phillips; Jillian W Gregg
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Seasonal shift from bottom-up to top-down impact in phytophagous insect populations.

Authors:  Claudio Gratton; Robert F Denno
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-01-31       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  A seasonal shift in habitat suitability enhances an annual predator subsidy.

Authors:  Danny Lewis; Robert F Denno
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 5.091

View more
  8 in total

1.  Plant production and alternate prey channels impact the abundance of top predators.

Authors:  Ali Arab; Gina M Wimp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Predator population size structure alters consumption of prey from epigeic and grazing food webs.

Authors:  Shannon M Murphy; Danny Lewis; Gina M Wimp
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Fear of predation alters soil carbon dioxide flux and nitrogen content.

Authors:  Michael I Sitvarin; Ann L Rypstra
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Native and non-native plants provide similar refuge to invertebrate prey, but less than artificial plants.

Authors:  Bart M C Grutters; Bart J A Pollux; Wilco C E P Verberk; Elisabeth S Bakker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Trophic and Non-Trophic Interactions in a Biodiversity Experiment Assessed by Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Julia Tiede; Bernd Wemheuer; Michael Traugott; Rolf Daniel; Teja Tscharntke; Anne Ebeling; Christoph Scherber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Prey identity but not prey quality affects spider performance.

Authors:  Gina M Wimp; Danny Lewis; Shannon M Murphy
Journal:  Curr Res Insect Sci       Date:  2021-03-24

7.  Nutrient presses and pulses differentially impact plants, herbivores, detritivores and their natural enemies.

Authors:  Shannon M Murphy; Gina M Wimp; Danny Lewis; Robert F Denno
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Analyzing spatial patterns linked to the ecology of herbivores and their natural enemies in the soil.

Authors:  R Campos-Herrera; J G Ali; B M Diaz; L W Duncan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.753

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.