Literature DB >> 22926599

Does atomoxetine improve executive function, inhibitory control, and hyperactivity? Results from a placebo-controlled trial using quantitative measurement technology.

Peter M Wehmeier1, Alexander Schacht, Fredrik Ulberstad, Martin Lehmann, Christian Schneider-Fresenius, Gerd Lehmkuhl, Ralf W Dittmann, Tobias Banaschewski.   

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of atomoxetine (ATX) on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-related symptoms assessed as standard variables of a computer-based continuous performance test (cb-CPT) combined with a motion-tracking (MT) device. This was a 2-arm, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with ADHD (6-12 years). Therapy with ATX started with 0.5 mg/kg per day for 1 week, followed by 7 weeks on the target dosage of 1.2 mg/kg per day. Primary outcomes were cb-CPT/MT standard scores after 8 weeks using mixed models for repeated measurements. In addition, investigator-rated ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS), Weekly Ratings of Evening and Morning Behavior (WREMB), and Clinical Global Impression - Severity-ADHD (CGI-S-ADHD) scores were assessed. Of 128 patients randomized, 125 were evaluated (ATX/placebo: 63/62). Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups (overall, 80.2% boys; mean [SD] age, 9.0 [1.79] years; comorbid Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnosis, 40.0% oppositional defiant disorder/conduct disorder; prior stimulant treatment, 24.8%; ADHD-RS total score, 36.99 [11.56]). At week 8, all cb-CPT/MT q-scores were significantly reduced versus placebo (all P < 0.001) with effect sizes (ESs) of reaction time (RT) variation (ES = 0.71), mean RT (ES = 0.41), number of microevents (ES = 1.00), commission error rate (ES = 0.50), distance of movement (ES = 0.90), area of movement (ES = 1.08), omission error rate (ES = 0.70), time active (ES = 0.69), motion simplicity (ES = 0.38), and normalized variance of RT (ES = 0.50). Secondary end points also improved significantly in favor of ATX: ADHD-RS (total score ES = 1.30, P < 0.001; hyperactivity/impulsivity subscore ES = 1.37, P < 0.001; inattention subscore ES = 1.07, P < 0.001), WREMB (total score ES = 1.00, P < 0.001; morning subscore ES = 0.59, P = 0.002; evening subscore ES = 1.02, P < 0.001), CGI-S-ADHD (ES = 1.11, P < 0.001). The results of this study show that ATX for 8 weeks significantly reduced ADHD-related symptoms as measured by the cb-CPT/MT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926599     DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e318267c304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  10 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation improves clinical symptoms in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Cornelia Soff; Anna Sotnikova; Hanna Christiansen; Katja Becker; Michael Siniatchkin
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  What is the level of evidence for the use of currently available technologies in facilitating the self-management of difficulties associated with ADHD in children and young people? A systematic review.

Authors:  Lauren Powell; Jack Parker; Valerie Harpin
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 4.785

Review 3.  The clinical utility of the continuous performance test and objective measures of activity for diagnosing and monitoring ADHD in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Charlotte L Hall; Althea Z Valentine; Madeleine J Groom; Gemma M Walker; Kapil Sayal; David Daley; Chris Hollis
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 4.785

4.  The use of reaction time distributions to study attention in male rats: the effects of atomoxetine and guanfacine.

Authors:  Zach V Redding; Pooja Chawla; Karen E Sabol
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  The efficacy of atomoxetine for the treatment of children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a comprehensive review of over a decade of clinical research.

Authors:  Nicola C Savill; Jan K Buitelaar; Ernie Anand; Kathleen Ann Day; Tamás Treuer; Himanshu P Upadhyaya; David Coghill
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Meta-analysis of suicide-related behavior or ideation in child, adolescent, and adult patients treated with atomoxetine.

Authors:  Mark E Bangs; Linda A Wietecha; Shufang Wang; Andrew S Buchanan; Douglas K Kelsey
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 2.576

7.  A preliminary study of movement intensity during a Go/No-Go task and its association with ADHD outcomes and symptom severity.

Authors:  Fenghua Li; Yi Zheng; Stephanie D Smith; Frederick Shic; Christina C Moore; Xixi Zheng; Yanjie Qi; Zhengkui Liu; James F Leckman
Journal:  Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health       Date:  2016-12-12       Impact factor: 3.033

Review 8.  Comparative efficacy and safety of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder pharmacotherapies, including guanfacine extended release: a mixed treatment comparison.

Authors:  Alain Joseph; Rajeev Ayyagari; Meng Xie; Sean Cai; Jipan Xie; Michael Huss; Vanja Sikirica
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.785

9.  Investigating the Clinical Utility of the Combined Use of Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD During Treatment Optimization.

Authors:  Nayra A Martin-Key; Amy Stevenson; Perry Roy
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Monitoring medication response in ADHD: what can continuous performance tests tell us?

Authors:  K Cedergren; S Östlund; J Åsberg Johnels; E Billstedt; M Johnson
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 5.270

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.