Literature DB >> 22926584

[Indirect laryngoscopy/video laryngoscopy. A review of devices used in emergency and intensive care medicine in Germany].

N Pirlich1, T Piepho, H Gervais, R R Noppens.   

Abstract

Airway management in intensive care or emergency medicine is particularly challenging and is often associated with life-threatening complications. An innovation in the field of airway management is the use of indirect laryngoscopy by means of video laryngoscopes. A digital camera or an optical system at the tip of a laryngoscope blade enables an indirect "look around the corner" to the glottis. Studies have shown that the advantages of video laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation are particularly beneficial in difficult airway situations. However, the successful use in challenging intubations requires experience and regular use in daily practice. This review gives an overview of indirect laryngoscopes commonly used in Germany and also presents new study results for these novel devices.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926584     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-012-0090-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  35 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath videolaryngoscope with the C-MAC videolaryngoscope in intubating adult patients with potential difficult airways.

Authors:  I Ng; A L Hill; D L Williams; K Lee; R Segal
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  3,423 emergency tracheal intubations at a university hospital: airway outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Lizabeth D Martin; Jill M Mhyre; Amy M Shanks; Kevin K Tremper; Sachin Kheterpal
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Effect of stylet angulation and endotracheal tube camber on time to intubation with the GlideScope.

Authors:  Philip M Jones; Timothy P Turkstra; Kevin P Armstrong; Paidrig M Armstrong; Richard A Cherry; Jason Hoogstra; Christopher C Harle
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Preliminary evaluation of a novel videolaryngoscope, the McGrath series 5, in the management of difficult and challenging endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Anthony M O'Leary; Michael R Sandison; Neeli Myneni; Denis J Cirilla; Kevin W Roberts; Glenn D Deane
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.452

5.  Use of the Airtraq laryngoscope for emergency intubation in the prehospital setting: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Helmut Trimmel; Janett Kreutziger; Georg Fertsak; Robert Fitzka; Markus Dittrich; Wolfgang G Voelckel
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation.

Authors:  Marshal B Kaplan; Carin A Hagberg; Denham S Ward; Ansgar Brambrink; Ashwani K Chhibber; Thomas Heidegger; Leonardo Lozada; Andranik Ovassapian; David Parsons; James Ramsay; Wolfram Wilhelm; Bernhard Zwissler; Haus J Gerig; Christian Hofstetter; Suzanne Karan; Nevin Kreisler; Robert M Pousman; Andreas Thierbach; Marc Wrobel; George Berci
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.452

7.  Comparison of the McGrath® Series 5 and GlideScope® Ranger with the Macintosh laryngoscope by paramedics.

Authors:  Tim Piepho; Kathrin Weinert; Florian M Heid; Christian Werner; Rüdiger R Noppens
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.

Authors:  André van Zundert; Ralph Maassen; Ruben Lee; Remi Willems; Michel Timmerman; Marc Siemonsma; Marc Buise; Marco Wiepking
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Comparison of the Glidescope and Airtraq optical laryngoscopes in patients undergoing direct microlaryngoscopy.

Authors:  M Lange; M Frommer; A Redel; H Trautner; J Hampel; P Kranke; F Kehl; L U Scholtz; N Roewer
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 10.  Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Donald E G Griesdale; David Liu; James McKinney; Peter T Choi
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 5.063

View more
  5 in total

1.  [Comparison of GlideScope® Cobalt and McGrath® Series 5 video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in a simulated regurgitation/aspiration scenario].

Authors:  M Kriege; T Piepho; H Buggenhagen; R R Noppens
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  [The ulm emergency algorithm for the acute treatment of drug-induced, bradykinin-mediated angioedema].

Authors:  J Hahn; B Bock; C-M Muth; A Pfaue; D Friedrich; T K Hoffmann; J Greve
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  [Tracheal rupture following endotracheal intubation for an emergency cesarean].

Authors:  S Kübler; N Kiefer; R Ciolka; R Rixecker; M Amarasekara; R K Ellerkmann
Journal:  Anaesthesiologie       Date:  2022-04-14

4.  [Algorithm for securing an unexpected difficult airway : User analysis on a simulator].

Authors:  T Ott; K Truschinski; M Kriege; M Naß; S Herrmann; V Ott; S Sellin
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Comparing Four Video Laryngoscopes and One Optical Laryngoscope with a Standard Macintosh Blade in a Simulated Trapped Car Accident Victim.

Authors:  Florian J Raimann; Daniel M Tepperis; Dirk Meininger; Kai Zacharowski; Richard Schalk; Christian Byhahn; Christian F Weber; Haitham Mutlak
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 1.112

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.