Literature DB >> 22926436

The effect of distraction on face and voice recognition.

Sarah V Stevenage1, Greg J Neil, Jess Barlow, Amy Dyson, Catherine Eaton-Brown, Beth Parsons.   

Abstract

The results of two experiments are presented which explore the effect of distractor items on face and voice recognition. Following from the suggestion that voice processing is relatively weak compared to face processing, it was anticipated that voice recognition would be more affected by the presentation of distractor items between study and test compared to face recognition. Using a sequential matching task with a fixed interval between study and test that either incorporated distractor items or did not, the results supported our prediction. Face recognition remained strong irrespective of the number of distractor items between study and test. In contrast, voice recognition was significantly impaired by the presence of distractor items regardless of their number (Experiment 1). This pattern remained whether distractor items were highly similar to the targets or not (Experiment 2). These results offer support for the proposal that voice processing is a relatively vulnerable method of identification.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22926436     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-012-0450-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  10 in total

1.  Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model.

Authors:  A M Burton; V Bruce; R A Johnston
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1990-08

2.  Recalling semantic information about newly learned faces and voices.

Authors:  Catherine Barsics; Serge Brédart
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-05-30

3.  Recalling episodic and semantic information about famous faces and voices.

Authors:  Ljubica Damjanovic; J Richard Hanley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

4.  Intra- and inter-modal repetition priming of familiar faces and voices.

Authors:  H D Ellis; D M Jones; N Mosdell
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1997-02

5.  Recalling episodic information about personally known faces and voices.

Authors:  Catherine Barsics; Serge Brédart
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-04-08

6.  The effect of exposure to multiple lineups on face identification accuracy.

Authors:  T Hinz; K Pezdek
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2001-04

7.  Long-term auditory memory: speaker identification.

Authors:  H Saslove; A D Yarmey
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1980-02

8.  The face advantage in recalling episodic information: implications for modeling human memory.

Authors:  Ljubica Damjanovic
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2010-07-08

9.  Why are familiar-only experiences more frequent for voices than for faces?

Authors:  J R Hanley; J M Turner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-11

10.  It is more difficult to retrieve a familiar person's name and occupation from their voice than from their blurred face.

Authors:  J Richard Hanley; Ljubica Damjanovic
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2009-11
  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Explaining face-voice matching decisions: The contribution of mouth movements, stimulus effects and response biases.

Authors:  Nadine Lavan; Harriet Smith; Li Jiang; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  A unified coding strategy for processing faces and voices.

Authors:  Galit Yovel; Pascal Belin
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Memory for faces and voices varies as a function of sex and expressed emotion.

Authors:  Diana S Cortes; Petri Laukka; Christina Lindahl; Håkan Fischer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A sound effect: Exploration of the distinctiveness advantage in voice recognition.

Authors:  Sarah V Stevenage; Greg J Neil; Beth Parsons; Abi Humphreys
Journal:  Appl Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-07-04

5.  Effects of visual map complexity on the attentional processing of landmarks.

Authors:  Julian Keil; Dennis Edler; Lars Kuchinke; Frank Dickmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Sorting through the impact of familiarity when processing vocal identity: Results from a voice sorting task.

Authors:  Sarah V Stevenage; Ashley E Symons; Abi Fletcher; Chantelle Coen
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.143

7.  Unimodal and cross-modal identity judgements using an audio-visual sorting task: Evidence for independent processing of faces and voices.

Authors:  Nadine Lavan; Harriet M J Smith; Carolyn McGettigan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-07-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.