OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate diagnostic value of electrical lumbar root stimulation (RS) at the laminar level in the early stage of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). METHODS: Fifteen patients (30 sides) and nine controls (17 sides) were included in the study. Conventional nerve conduction studies, needle electromyography, F responses and electrical lumbar RS were obtained from both groups. The needle electrical stimulation was performed at the L2-3 intervertebral level. Vastus lateralis, tibialis anterior and soleus muscles were investigated bilaterally and simultaneously in the first and fourth weeks. RESULTS: In all patients, the amplitudes elicited by lumbar RS were significantly attenuated while the conventional electrophysiological findings were normal and/or not diagnostic in 6 of 15 patients (40%) within the first week. Motor latencies by the lumbar RS were prolonged in the patients, compared to the controls, but the results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: M-responses elicited by lumbar RS appear to be helpful in disclosing proximal conduction abnormalities of GBS early in the course. SIGNIFICANCE: Lumbar RS seems to be a useful method in making the diagnosis of GBS early and there is no considerable side effect of this particular method.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate diagnostic value of electrical lumbar root stimulation (RS) at the laminar level in the early stage of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). METHODS: Fifteen patients (30 sides) and nine controls (17 sides) were included in the study. Conventional nerve conduction studies, needle electromyography, F responses and electrical lumbar RS were obtained from both groups. The needle electrical stimulation was performed at the L2-3 intervertebral level. Vastus lateralis, tibialis anterior and soleus muscles were investigated bilaterally and simultaneously in the first and fourth weeks. RESULTS: In all patients, the amplitudes elicited by lumbar RS were significantly attenuated while the conventional electrophysiological findings were normal and/or not diagnostic in 6 of 15 patients (40%) within the first week. Motor latencies by the lumbar RS were prolonged in the patients, compared to the controls, but the results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: M-responses elicited by lumbar RS appear to be helpful in disclosing proximal conduction abnormalities of GBS early in the course. SIGNIFICANCE: Lumbar RS seems to be a useful method in making the diagnosis of GBS early and there is no considerable side effect of this particular method.
Authors: José Berciano; María J Sedano; Ana L Pelayo-Negro; Antonio García; Pedro Orizaola; Elena Gallardo; Miguel Lafarga; María T Berciano; Bart C Jacobs Journal: J Neurol Date: 2016-06-17 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: José Berciano; Pedro Orizaola; Elena Gallardo; Ana L Pelayo-Negro; Pascual Sánchez-Juan; Jon Infante; María J Sedano Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Pract Date: 2019-11-30