Literature DB >> 22925428

Productivity cost calculations in health economic evaluations: correcting for compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects.

Marieke Krol1, Werner B F Brouwer, Johan L Severens, Janneke Kaper, Silvia M A A Evers.   

Abstract

Productivity costs related to paid work are commonly calculated in economic evaluations of health technologies by multiplying the relevant number of work days lost with a wage rate estimate. It has been argued that actual productivity costs may either be lower or higher than current estimates due to compensation mechanisms and/or multiplier effects (related to team dependency and problems with finding good substitutes in cases of absenteeism). Empirical evidence on such mechanisms and their impact on productivity costs is scarce, however. This study aims to increase knowledge on how diminished productivity is compensated within firms. Moreover, it aims to explore how compensation and multiplier effects potentially affect productivity cost estimates. Absenteeism and compensation mechanisms were measured in a randomized trial among Dutch citizens examining the cost-effectiveness of reimbursement for smoking cessation treatment. Multiplier effects were extracted from published literature. Productivity costs were calculated applying the Friction Cost Approach. Regular estimates were subsequently adjusted for (i) compensation during regular working hours, (ii) job dependent multipliers and (iii) both compensation and multiplier effects. A total of 187 respondents included in the trial were useful for inclusion in this study, based on being in paid employment, having experienced absenteeism in the preceding six months and completing the questionnaire on absenteeism and compensation mechanisms. Over half of these respondents stated that their absenteeism was compensated during normal working hours by themselves or colleagues. Only counting productivity costs not compensated in regular working hours reduced the traditional estimate by 57%. Correcting for multiplier effects increased regular estimates by a quarter. Combining both impacts decreased traditional estimates by 29%. To conclude, large amounts of lost production are compensated in normal hours. Productivity costs estimates are strongly influenced by adjustment for compensation mechanisms and multiplier effects. The validity of such adjustments needs further examination, however.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22925428     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  13 in total

1.  Variation in the methodological approach to productivity cost valuation: the case of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul Hanly; Rebecca Maguire; Frances Drummond; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-08-23

2.  Employer survey to estimate the productivity friction period.

Authors:  Kathleen Manipis; Stephen Goodall; Paul Hanly; Rosalie Viney; Alison Pearce
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-01-02

3.  The impact of firms' adjustments on the indirect cost of illness.

Authors:  Michał Jakubczyk; Beata Koń
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2017-02-02

Review 4.  Productivity costs in economic evaluations: past, present, future.

Authors:  Marieke Krol; Werner Brouwer; Frans Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  How to estimate productivity costs in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Marieke Krol; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Health-related productivity loss: NICE to recognize soon, good to discuss now.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Estimating productivity costs using the friction cost approach in practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jesse Kigozi; Sue Jowett; Martyn Lewis; Pelham Barton; Joanna Coast
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-11-12

8.  Work productivity loss from depression: evidence from an employer survey.

Authors:  Kathryn M Rost; Hongdao Meng; Stanley Xu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Impact of etanercept tapering on work productivity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: results from the PRIZE study.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Nick Bansback; Huiying Sun; Ronald Pedersen; Sameer Kotak; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2016-07-07

10.  Estimating the monetary value of the annual productivity gained in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis receiving etanercept plus methotrexate: interim results from the PRIZE study.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Nick Bansback; Huiying Sun; Ronald Pedersen; Sameer Kotak; Aslam H Anis
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2015-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.