Literature DB >> 2292534

Efficacy and tolerance of cefpodoxime proxetil compared with ceftriaxone in vulnerable patients with bronchopneumonia.

P Zuck1, Y Rio, F Ichou.   

Abstract

This multicentre, randomized study compared the efficacy and tolerance of cefpodoxime proxetil and ceftriaxone in vulnerable patients with bronchopneumonia. Patients received cefpodoxime proxetil 200 mg bd orally or ceftriaxone 1 g daily im for a ten-day period. They were evaluated at days 10 and 30. Ninety-six patients were evaluated for tolerance, 85 for clinical efficacy and 65 for bacteriological efficacy. At entry all patients had radiographic evidence of pneumonia and 74% of bacteriological samples were positive. The percentage of overall success (cured or improved) was 97.7% (43/44) in the cefpodoxime proxetil group and 95.1% (39/41) in the ceftriaxone group. The bacteriological efficacy was 94.3% in the cefpodoxime proxetil group and 97.4% in the ceftriaxone group. Clinical tolerance was satisfactory in both groups. In this study, the clinical and bacteriological results obtained with cefpodoxime proxetil were comparable with those obtained with ceftriaxone in the treatment of community-acquired bronchopneumonia in patients with additional risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2292534     DOI: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_e.71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  13 in total

1.  BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  A retrospective comparison of ceftriaxone versus oxacillin for osteoarticular infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Brent W Wieland; Jodie R Marcantoni; Kerry M Bommarito; David K Warren; Jonas Marschall
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Full-course oral levofloxacin for treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  V Erard; O Lamy; P-Y Bochud; J Bille; A Cometta; T Calandra
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Consumption of antibiotics in Sweden, 1975 to 1992: pharmacoeconomic and clinical aspects.

Authors:  S R Norrby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Clinical and economic considerations in the use of third-generation oral cephalosporins.

Authors:  S T Chambers; D R Murdoch; M J Pearce
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Cefpodoxime proxetil in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  A M Geddes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Cost-effective treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  J C Garrelts; A M Herrington
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Cefpodoxime proxetil. An appraisal of its use in antibacterial cost-containment programmes, as stepdown and abbreviated therapy in respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; P Benfield
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 9.  Future directions in antimicrobial chemotherapy.

Authors:  R Janknegt
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1992-08-21

Review 10.  A guide to the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  F Vogel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.