H Glenn Bohlen1. 1. Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University Medical School, Indianapolis, Indiana 46140, USA. gbohlen@iupui.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There is a debate if the [NO] required to influence vascular smooth muscle is below 50 nM or much higher. Electrodes with 30 μm and larger diameter report [NO] below 50 nM, whereas those with diameters of <10-12 μm report hundreds of nM. This study examined how size of electrodes influenced [NO] measurement due to NO consumption and unstirred layer issues. METHODS: Electrodes were 2 mm disk, 30 μm × 2 mm carbon fiber, and single 7 μm diameter carbon fiber within open tip microelectrode, and exposed 7 μm carbon fiber of ~15 μm to 2 mm length. RESULTS: All electrodes demonstrated linear calibrations with sufficient stirring. As stirring slowed, 30 μm and 2 mm electrodes reported much lower [NO] due to unstirred layers and high NO consumption. The three 7 μm microelectrodes had minor stirring issues. With limited stirring with NO present, 7 μm open tip microelectrodes advanced toward 30 μm and 2 mm electrodes experienced dramatically decreased current within 10-50 μm of the larger electrodes due to high NO consumption. None of the 7 μm microelectrodes interacted. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate large electrodes underestimate [NO] due to excessive NO consumption under conditions where unstirred layers are unavoidable and true microelectrodes are required for valid measurements.
OBJECTIVE: There is a debate if the [NO] required to influence vascular smooth muscle is below 50 nM or much higher. Electrodes with 30 μm and larger diameter report [NO] below 50 nM, whereas those with diameters of <10-12 μm report hundreds of nM. This study examined how size of electrodes influenced [NO] measurement due to NO consumption and unstirred layer issues. METHODS: Electrodes were 2 mm disk, 30 μm × 2 mm carbon fiber, and single 7 μm diameter carbon fiber within open tip microelectrode, and exposed 7 μm carbon fiber of ~15 μm to 2 mm length. RESULTS: All electrodes demonstrated linear calibrations with sufficient stirring. As stirring slowed, 30 μm and 2 mm electrodes reported much lower [NO] due to unstirred layers and high NO consumption. The three 7 μm microelectrodes had minor stirring issues. With limited stirring with NO present, 7 μm open tip microelectrodes advanced toward 30 μm and 2 mm electrodes experienced dramatically decreased current within 10-50 μm of the larger electrodes due to high NO consumption. None of the 7 μm microelectrodes interacted. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate large electrodes underestimate [NO] due to excessive NO consumption under conditions where unstirred layers are unavoidable and true microelectrodes are required for valid measurements.
Authors: Ella S M Ng; David Jourd'heuil; Joe M McCord; Daniel Hernandez; Mitsukuni Yasui; Derrice Knight; Paul Kubes Journal: Circ Res Date: 2004-01-22 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Tienush Rassaf; Petra Kleinbongard; Michael Preik; André Dejam; Putrika Gharini; Thomas Lauer; Julia Erckenbrecht; Alexej Duschin; Rainer Schulz; Gerd Heusch; Martin Feelisch; Malte Kelm Journal: Circ Res Date: 2002-09-20 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Ali Barandov; Souparno Ghosh; Nan Li; Benjamin B Bartelle; Jade I Daher; Michael L Pegis; Hannah Collins; Alan Jasanoff Journal: ACS Sens Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 7.711
Authors: Matthew A Muller; Todd Belcik; James Hodovan; Koya Ozawa; Eran Brown; Jeffry Powers; Paul S Sheeran; Jonathan R Lindner Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 7.722