| Literature DB >> 22924019 |
E Shiferaw, M E Pè, E Porceddu, M Ponnaiah.
Abstract
Expressed sequence tags (ESTs) in public databases and cross-species transferable markers are considered to be a cost-effective means for developing sequence-based markers for less-studied species. In this study, EST-simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers developed from Lathyrus sativus L. EST sequences and cross-transferable EST-SSRs derived from Medicago truncatula L. were utilized to investigate the genetic diversity among grass pea populations from Ethiopia. A total of 45 alleles were detected using eleven EST-SSRs with an average of four alleles per locus. The average polymorphism information content for all primers was 0.416. The average gene diversity was 0.477, ranging from 0.205 for marker Ls942 to 0.804 for MtBA32F05. F(ST) values estimated by analysis of molecular variance were 0.01, 0.15, and 0.84 for among regions, among accessions and within accessions respectively, indicating that most of the variation (84%) resides within accessions. Model-based cluster analysis grouped the accessions into three clusters, grouping accessions irrespective of their collection regions. Among the regions, high levels of diversity were observed in Gojam, Gonder, Shewa and Welo regions, with Gonder region showing a higher number of different alleles. From breeding and conservation aspects, conducting a close study on a specific population would be advisable for genetic improvement in the crop, and it would be appropriate if future collection and conservation plans give due attention to under-represented regions. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11032-011-9662-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22924019 PMCID: PMC3410020 DOI: 10.1007/s11032-011-9662-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Breed ISSN: 1380-3743 Impact factor: 2.589
Characteristics of the EST-SSR markers used for germplasm analysis
| Marker name | Repeat motif | No. of alleles | Size range (bp) | Allele size with high frequency (bp) | Major AF (%) | GD | H | PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| (GT)8 | 4 | 157–165 | 159 | 45 | 0.628 | 0.297 | 0.551 |
|
| (TC)7 | 5 | 160–168 | 162 | 67 | 0.477 | 0.430 | 0.413 |
|
| (GTTG)3 | 3 | 164–172 | 168 | 54 | 0.500 | 0.375 | 0.379 |
|
| (ATG)5 | 3 | 173–179 | 176 | 86 | 0.237 | 0.150 | 0.212 |
|
| (TTC)4 | 4 | 132–147 | 144 | 80 | 0.325 | 0.391 | 0.279 |
|
| (CAT)4 | 4 | 158–173 | 170 | 80 | 0.321 | 0.378 | 0.274 |
|
| (CCAA)3 | 2 | 137–145 | 137 | 88 | 0.205 | 0.223 | 0.184 |
|
| (TGG)7 | 5 | 338–368 | 344 | 39 | 0.695 | 0.435 | 0.639 |
|
| (TC)17 | 5 | 117–125 | 119 | 55 | 0.556 | 0.300 | 0.470 |
|
| (AG)7 | 3 | 79–91 | 81 | 58 | 0.504 | 0.630 | 0.399 |
|
| (AG)5 | 7 | 162–176 | 172 | 29 | 0.804 | 0.646 | 0.776 |
| Mean | 4 | 0.477 | 0.387 | 0.416 |
AF frequency of alleles, GD gene diversity, H heterozygosity, PIC polymorphism information content. All parameters were estimated using a set of 240 plants
Diversity parameters of the 20 accessions of grass pea analyzed using EST-SSRs
| Accession code | Accession no | P | Na | Ne | I | Ho | He |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46019 | 100.00 | 2.63 | 2.00 | 0.711 | 0.429 | 0.431 |
| 2 | 234043 | 90.91 | 2.82 | 1.95 | 0.709 | 0.357 | 0.405 |
| 3 | 236700 | 100.00 | 2.82 | 1.98 | 0.726 | 0.372 | 0.421 |
| 4 | 235018 | 90.91 | 2.82 | 2.26 | 0.782 | 0.407 | 0.455 |
| 5 | 238241 | 90.91 | 2.91 | 1.91 | 0.717 | 0.404 | 0.418 |
| 6 | 238945 | 100.00 | 3.09 | 2.16 | 0.814 | 0.468 | 0.470 |
| 7 | 238955 | 100.00 | 2.73 | 1.91 | 0.689 | 0.345 | 0.408 |
| 8 | 236562 | 100.00 | 2.45 | 1.79 | 0.677 | 0.359 | 0.422 |
| 9 | 231325 | 90.91 | 2.73 | 1.97 | 0.686 | 0.320 | 0.392 |
| 10 | 238931 | 100.00 | 3.00 | 2.21 | 0.799 | 0.417 | 0.452 |
| 11 | 236568 | 100.00 | 2.54 | 1.99 | 0.708 | 0.389 | 0.428 |
| 12 | 46106 | 90.91 | 2.82 | 1.95 | 0.687 | 0.336 | 0.405 |
| 13 | 46015 | 100.00 | 2.54 | 1.88 | 0.696 | 0.451 | 0.430 |
| 14 | 238929 | 100.00 | 2.82 | 2.08 | 0.737 | 0.448 | 0.427 |
| 15 | 215706 | 100.00 | 2.36 | 1.95 | 0.692 | 0.504 | 0.441 |
| 16 | 46050 | 80.00 | 2.27 | 1.76 | 0.598 | 0.413 | 0.382 |
| 17 | 215246 | 100.00 | 2.54 | 1.86 | 0.653 | 0.469 | 0.402 |
| 18 | 207497 | 100.00 | 2.63 | 1.91 | 0.712 | 0.437 | 0.434 |
| 19 | 212742 | 90.91 | 2.81 | 1.97 | 0.692 | 0.424 | 0.427 |
| 20 | 241143 | 90.91 | 2.54 | 1.77 | 0.595 | 0.326 | 0.354 |
| Overall | 95.5 | 2.69 | 1.96 | 0.704 | 0.404 | 0.419 | |
| Mean (SE) | (1.25) | (0.073) | (0.054) | (0.025) | (0.015) | (0.013) |
P percentage of polymorphic loci, Na number of different alleles, Ne number of effective alleles, I Shannon’s information index, Ho observed heterozygosity, He expected heterozygosity
Diversity parameters among seven regions of Ethiopia
| Region | P | Na | Ne | I | Ho | He |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shewa | 100 | 3.09 | 2.12 | 0.787 | 0.388 | 0.464 |
| Tigray | 100 | 3.36 | 2.04 | 0.781 | 0.403 | 0.442 |
| Gojam | 100 | 3.54 | 2.24 | 0.832 | 0.430 | 0.478 |
| Welo | 100 | 3.36 | 2.12 | 0.787 | 0.429 | 0.462 |
| Gonder | 100 | 3.63 | 2.35 | 0.855 | 0.434 | 0.474 |
| Arsi | 90.91 | 2.73 | 1.97 | 0.686 | 0.320 | 0.392 |
| Hararge | 90.91 | 2.54 | 1.76 | 0.595 | 0.326 | 0.354 |
| Overall | 97.40 | 3.18 | 2.07 | 0.760 | 0.390 | 0.430 |
| [Mean (SD)] | (0.15) | (0.10) | (0.046) | (0.022) | (0.023) |
P percentage of polymorphic loci, Na number of different alleles, Ne number of effective alleles, I Shannon’s information index, Ho observed heterozygosity, He expected heterozygosity
Analysis of genetic differentiation among accessions of grass pea by AMOVA
| Source of variation |
| SS | MS | Est. var. | % |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among regions | 6 | 120.357 | 20.059 | 0.086 | 1 | 0.004 |
| Among populations | 13 | 223.847 | 17.219 | 0.974 | 15 | 0.001 |
| Within population | 220 | 1,216.667 | 5.530 | 5.530 | 84 | 0.001 |
| Total | 239 | 1,560.871 | 6.590 | 100 |
df Degrees of freedom, SS sum of squares deviations, MS mean squared deviation, Est. Var. estimates of variance components, % percentage of total variance contributed by each component
Fig. 1a Estimated population structure of the grass pea landraces from Ethiopia (K = 3); each individual is represented by a single vertical line broken into K segments, with lengths proportional to each of the K inferred clusters. b Summary plot of estimated membership of 240 individuals in three clusters