Literature DB >> 22923716

Diagnostic performance of a dedicated 1.5-T breast MR imaging system.

Bruce J Hillman1, Steven E Harms, Gary Stevens, Rebecca G Stough, Alan B Hollingsworth, Kamilia F Kozlowski, Lawrence J Moss.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess diagnostic performance of dedicated breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at breast imaging centers by using a dedicated 1.5-T breast MR system that used high-spatial-resolution, high-contrast-resolution spiral trajectory acquisitions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant, with waiver of informed consent. Diagnostic performance was retrospectively assessed for 934 consecutive screening (n=347) and diagnostic (n=587) examinations performed from April 2006 to December 2007 in women aged 25-89 years old from four sites for which dedicated breast MR imaging reports and ground truth (biopsy for cancer cases, 1-year follow-up with negative results for cases with negative findings) were available. The sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for breast MR imaging were determined.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for the dedicated breast MR imaging system were 92% (92 of 100) and 88.8% (741 of 834). For all cases, the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.9% (741 of 749). The NPV for screening cases was 100% (326 of 326). The area under the ROC curve was 0.942. Of the 93 cases with false-positive findings seen at dedicated breast MR imaging, 25 (27%) were high-risk histologic findings for which excision is often recommended. The false-positive rate was 93 of 834 (11.2%) for all cases, but only 16 of 326 (4.9%) for the screening cohort.
CONCLUSION: High accuracy was achieved by using dedicated breast MR imaging. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22923716     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12110600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

Review 1.  Novel imaging approaches to screen for breast cancer: Recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  Christopher L Vaughan
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  Redefining the sensitivity of screening mammography: A review.

Authors:  Alan B Hollingsworth
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-02-02       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Auditing a breast MRI practice: performance measures for screening and diagnostic breast MRI.

Authors:  Bethany L Niell; Sara C Gavenonis; Tina Motazedi; Jessica Cott Chubiz; Elkan P Halpern; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Janie M Lee
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Feasibility of Breast MRI as the Primary Imaging Modality in a Large Asian Cohort.

Authors:  Fang-Ying Li; Alan Hollingsworth; Wai-Tak Lai; Tsung-Lung Yang; Liang-Juan Chen; Wei-Teng Wang; Jing-Lung Wang; Abraham N Morse
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.