PURPOSE: To analyze differences in the therapeutic approach to and tumor-related mortality of young and elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive study of a retrospective cohort, based on administrative databases, of all patients with CRC diagnosed or treated in our institution. We extracted data on sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, type of cancer, type of treatment received, survival time, and cause of death. We compared differences between a young group (YG) (age <75 years) and an older group (OG) (age ≥75 years) and assessed the variables associated with receiving different therapeutic options (multivariate analysis) and with survival time (Cox proportional hazards models). RESULTS: The study included 503 patients (YG, 320; OG, 183), with mean ages of 63.1 years in the YG and 81.8 years in the OG. No differences were observed between the groups in degree of differentiation, extension, tumor stage, or comorbidity. After adjustment for gender, comorbidity, and tumor localization and extension, YG patients were more likely than OG patients to receive surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy and less likely to receive palliative care. After a median follow-up of 36.5 months, YG patients had a longer tumor-specific survival time than OG patients (36.41 months vs 26.05 months). After further adjustment, the YG had a lower tumor-specific mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.66) than the OG. CONCLUSION: In comparison with younger patients, elderly CRC patients are undertreated, mainly because of their age and not because of their tumor type or comorbidity. Elderly patients have a significantly shorter tumor-specific survival time, partially because of this undertreatment.
PURPOSE: To analyze differences in the therapeutic approach to and tumor-related mortality of young and elderly colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive study of a retrospective cohort, based on administrative databases, of all patients with CRC diagnosed or treated in our institution. We extracted data on sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, type of cancer, type of treatment received, survival time, and cause of death. We compared differences between a young group (YG) (age <75 years) and an older group (OG) (age ≥75 years) and assessed the variables associated with receiving different therapeutic options (multivariate analysis) and with survival time (Cox proportional hazards models). RESULTS: The study included 503 patients (YG, 320; OG, 183), with mean ages of 63.1 years in the YG and 81.8 years in the OG. No differences were observed between the groups in degree of differentiation, extension, tumor stage, or comorbidity. After adjustment for gender, comorbidity, and tumor localization and extension, YG patients were more likely than OG patients to receive surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy and less likely to receive palliative care. After a median follow-up of 36.5 months, YG patients had a longer tumor-specific survival time than OG patients (36.41 months vs 26.05 months). After further adjustment, the YG had a lower tumor-specific mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.66) than the OG. CONCLUSION: In comparison with younger patients, elderly CRCpatients are undertreated, mainly because of their age and not because of their tumor type or comorbidity. Elderly patients have a significantly shorter tumor-specific survival time, partially because of this undertreatment.
Authors: John Z Ayanian; Alan M Zaslavsky; Charles S Fuchs; Edward Guadagnoli; Cynthia M Creech; Rosemary D Cress; Lilia C O'Connor; Dee W West; Mark E Allen; Robert E Wolf; William E Wright Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Farid Fata; Ayoub Mirza; G Craig; Suresh Nair; Amy Law; James Gallagher; Neil Ellison; Albert Bernath Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; Jack M Guralnik; Chiara Cavazzini; Stefania Bandinelli; Fulvio Lauretani; Benedetta Bartali; Lazzaro Repetto; Dan L Longo Journal: Crit Rev Oncol Hematol Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Arnold L Potosky; Linda C Harlan; Richard S Kaplan; Karen A Johnson; Charles F Lynch Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vijaya Sundararajan; Nandita Mitra; Judith S Jacobson; Victor R Grann; Daniel F Heitjan; Alfred I Neugut Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-03-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: G Folprecht; D Cunningham; P Ross; B Glimelius; F Di Costanzo; J Wils; W Scheithauer; P Rougier; E Aranda; H Hecker; C-H Köhne Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: R Vera; J Aparicio; F Carballo; M Esteva; E González-Flores; J Santianes; F Santolaya; J M Fernández-Cebrián Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 3.405