BACKGROUND: Gait speed is a quick, inexpensive, reliable measure of functional capacity with well-documented predictive value for major health-related outcomes. Numerous epidemiological studies have documented gait speed in healthy, community-dwelling older people. The purpose of this study is to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of gait speed in a specific group with mobility limitations-geriatric patients in clinical settings. METHODS: Relevant databases were searched systematically for original research articles published in February 2011 measuring gait speed in persons aged 70 or older in hospital inpatient or outpatients settings. Meta-analysis determined gait speed data for each setting adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: The review included 48 studies providing data from 7,000 participants. Across the hospital settings, the gait speed estimate for usual pace was 0.58 m/s (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.67) and for maximal pace was 0.89 m/s (95% CI: 0.75-1.02). These estimates were based on most recent year of publication (2011) and median percentage of female participants (63%). Gait speed at usual pace in acute care settings was 0.46 m/s (95% CI: 0.34-0.57), which was significantly slower than the gait speed of 0.74 m/s (95% CI: 0.65-0.83) recorded in outpatient settings. CONCLUSIONS: Gait speed is an important measure in comprehensive geriatric assessment. The consolidation of data from multiple studies reported in this meta-analysis highlights the mobility limitations experienced by older people in clinical settings and the need for ongoing rehabilitation to attain levels sufficient for reintegration in the community.
BACKGROUND: Gait speed is a quick, inexpensive, reliable measure of functional capacity with well-documented predictive value for major health-related outcomes. Numerous epidemiological studies have documented gait speed in healthy, community-dwelling older people. The purpose of this study is to undertake a systematic review and meta-analysis of gait speed in a specific group with mobility limitations-geriatric patients in clinical settings. METHODS: Relevant databases were searched systematically for original research articles published in February 2011 measuring gait speed in persons aged 70 or older in hospital inpatient or outpatients settings. Meta-analysis determined gait speed data for each setting adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: The review included 48 studies providing data from 7,000 participants. Across the hospital settings, the gait speed estimate for usual pace was 0.58 m/s (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.67) and for maximal pace was 0.89 m/s (95% CI: 0.75-1.02). These estimates were based on most recent year of publication (2011) and median percentage of female participants (63%). Gait speed at usual pace in acute care settings was 0.46 m/s (95% CI: 0.34-0.57), which was significantly slower than the gait speed of 0.74 m/s (95% CI: 0.65-0.83) recorded in outpatient settings. CONCLUSIONS: Gait speed is an important measure in comprehensive geriatric assessment. The consolidation of data from multiple studies reported in this meta-analysis highlights the mobility limitations experienced by older people in clinical settings and the need for ongoing rehabilitation to attain levels sufficient for reintegration in the community.
Authors: Jordan F Karp; Jonathan McGovern; Megan M Marron; Peter Gerszten; Debra K Weiner; David Okonkwo; Adam S Kanter Journal: Pain Manag Date: 2016-04-22
Authors: Jason R Falvey; Allison M Gustavson; Lisa Price; Lucine Papazian; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: J Geriatr Phys Ther Date: 2019 Apr/Jun Impact factor: 3.381
Authors: Michael A Dunn; Deborah A Josbeno; Amit D Tevar; Vikrant Rachakonda; Swaytha R Ganesh; Amy R Schmotzer; Elizabeth A Kallenborn; Jaideep Behari; Douglas P Landsittel; Andrea F DiMartini; Anthony Delitto Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Rodolfo Savica; Ruth Cha; Dina I Drubach; Teresa Christianson; Vernon S Pankratz; Yonas E Geda; Mary M Machulda; Robert J Ivnik; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Walter A Rocca; Ronald C Petersen Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Teemu J Niiranen; Danielle M Enserro; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 6.053