MOTIVATION: RNA-seq has been widely used in transcriptome analysis to effectively measure gene expression levels. Although sequencing costs are rapidly decreasing, almost 70% of all the human RNA-seq samples in the gene expression omnibus do not have biological replicates and more unreplicated RNA-seq data were published than replicated RNA-seq data in 2011. Despite the large amount of single replicate studies, there is currently no satisfactory method for detecting differentially expressed genes when only a single biological replicate is available. RESULTS: We present the GFOLD (generalized fold change) algorithm to produce biologically meaningful rankings of differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. GFOLD assigns reliable statistics for expression changes based on the posterior distribution of log fold change. In this way, GFOLD overcomes the shortcomings of P-value and fold change calculated by existing RNA-seq analysis methods and gives more stable and biological meaningful gene rankings when only a single biological replicate is available. AVAILABILITY: The open source C/C++ program is available at http://www.tongji.edu.cn/∼zhanglab/GFOLD/index.html
MOTIVATION: RNA-seq has been widely used in transcriptome analysis to effectively measure gene expression levels. Although sequencing costs are rapidly decreasing, almost 70% of all the human RNA-seq samples in the gene expression omnibus do not have biological replicates and more unreplicated RNA-seq data were published than replicated RNA-seq data in 2011. Despite the large amount of single replicate studies, there is currently no satisfactory method for detecting differentially expressed genes when only a single biological replicate is available. RESULTS: We present the GFOLD (generalized fold change) algorithm to produce biologically meaningful rankings of differentially expressed genes from RNA-seq data. GFOLD assigns reliable statistics for expression changes based on the posterior distribution of log fold change. In this way, GFOLD overcomes the shortcomings of P-value and fold change calculated by existing RNA-seq analysis methods and gives more stable and biological meaningful gene rankings when only a single biological replicate is available. AVAILABILITY: The open source C/C++ program is available at http://www.tongji.edu.cn/∼zhanglab/GFOLD/index.html
Authors: Srinu Tumpara; Beatriz Martinez-Delgado; Gema Gomez-Mariano; Bin Liu; David S DeLuca; Elena Korenbaum; Danny Jonigk; Frank Jugert; Florian M Wurm; Maria J Wurm; Tobias Welte; Sabina Janciauskiene Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 5.810
Authors: Muzo Wu; John G Gibbons; Glen M DeLoid; Alice S Bedugnis; Rajesh K Thimmulappa; Shyam Biswal; Lester Kobzik Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Zhenxing Wang; Nicolas Butel; Juan Santos-González; Filipe Borges; Jun Yi; Robert A Martienssen; German Martinez; Claudia Köhler Journal: Plant Cell Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 11.277
Authors: P Hemarajata; C Gao; K J Pflughoeft; C M Thomas; D M Saulnier; J K Spinler; J Versalovic Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: R Jason Pitts; Chao Liu; Xiaofan Zhou; Juan C Malpartida; Laurence J Zwiebel Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-02-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shoji Yamamoto; Zhenhua Wu; Hege G Russnes; Shinji Takagi; Guillermo Peluffo; Charles Vaske; Xi Zhao; Hans Kristian Moen Vollan; Reo Maruyama; Muhammad B Ekram; Hanfei Sun; Jee Hyun Kim; Kristopher Carver; Mattia Zucca; Jianxing Feng; Vanessa Almendro; Marina Bessarabova; Oscar M Rueda; Yuri Nikolsky; Carlos Caldas; X Shirley Liu; Kornelia Polyak Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 31.743