Literature DB >> 22923292

Static network structure can be used to model the phenotypic effects of perturbations in regulatory networks.

Ariel Feiglin1, Adar Hacohen, Avital Sarusi, Jasmin Fisher, Ron Unger, Yanay Ofran.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Biological processes are dynamic, whereas the networks that depict them are typically static. Quantitative modeling using differential equations or logic-based functions can offer quantitative predictions of the behavior of biological systems, but they require detailed experimental characterization of interaction kinetics, which is typically unavailable. To determine to what extent complex biological processes can be modeled and analyzed using only the static structure of the network (i.e. the direction and sign of the edges), we attempt to predict the phenotypic effect of perturbations in biological networks from the static network structure.
RESULTS: We analyzed three networks from different sources: The EGFR/MAPK and PI3K/AKT network from a detailed experimental study, the TNF regulatory network from the STRING database and a large network of all NCI-curated pathways from the Protein Interaction Database. Altogether, we predicted the effect of 39 perturbations (e.g. by one or two drugs) on 433 target proteins/genes. In up to 82% of the cases, an algorithm that used only the static structure of the network correctly predicted whether any given protein/gene is upregulated or downregulated as a result of perturbations of other proteins/genes.
CONCLUSION: While quantitative modeling requires detailed experimental data and heavy computations, which limit its scalability for large networks, a wiring-based approach can use available data from pathway and interaction databases and may be scalable. These results lay the foundations for a large-scale approach of predicting phenotypes based on the schematic structure of networks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22923292     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  10 in total

Review 1.  Toward Omics-Based, Systems Biomedicine, and Path and Drug Discovery Methodologies for Depression-Inflammation Research.

Authors:  Michael Maes; Gabriel Nowak; Javier R Caso; Juan Carlos Leza; Cai Song; Marta Kubera; Hans Klein; Piotr Galecki; Cristiano Noto; Enrico Glaab; Rudi Balling; Michael Berk
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Proteins interaction network and modeling of IGVH mutational status in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  María Camila Álvarez-Silva; Sally Yepes; Maria Mercedes Torres; Andrés Fernando González Barrios
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 2.432

3.  Network reconstruction based on proteomic data and prior knowledge of protein connectivity using graph theory.

Authors:  Vassilis Stavrakas; Ioannis N Melas; Theodore Sakellaropoulos; Leonidas G Alexopoulos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Detecting and removing inconsistencies between experimental data and signaling network topologies using integer linear programming on interaction graphs.

Authors:  Ioannis N Melas; Regina Samaga; Leonidas G Alexopoulos; Steffen Klamt
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Computer simulations of the signalling network in FLT3 +-acute myeloid leukaemia - indications for an optimal dosage of inhibitors against FLT3 and CDK6.

Authors:  Antoine Buetti-Dinh; Ran Friedman
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Boolean ErbB network reconstructions and perturbation simulations reveal individual drug response in different breast cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Silvia von der Heyde; Christian Bender; Frauke Henjes; Johanna Sonntag; Ulrike Korf; Tim Beißbarth
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2014-06-25

7.  PSFC: a Pathway Signal Flow Calculator App for Cytoscape.

Authors:  Lilit Nersisyan; Graham Johnson; Megan Riel-Mehan; Alexander Pico; Arsen Arakelyan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-08-05

8.  Topological estimation of signal flow in complex signaling networks.

Authors:  Daewon Lee; Kwang-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Signal flow control of complex signaling networks.

Authors:  Daewon Lee; Kwang-Hyun Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Reverse engineering directed gene regulatory networks from transcriptomics and proteomics data of biomining bacterial communities with approximate Bayesian computation and steady-state signalling simulations.

Authors:  Antoine Buetti-Dinh; Malte Herold; Stephan Christel; Mohamed El Hajjami; Francesco Delogu; Olga Ilie; Sören Bellenberg; Paul Wilmes; Ansgar Poetsch; Wolfgang Sand; Mario Vera; Igor V Pivkin; Ran Friedman; Mark Dopson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.