Literature DB >> 22922676

Angioarchitecture determines obliteration rate after radiosurgery in brain arteriovenous malformations.

Patamintita Taeshineetanakul1, Timo Krings, Sasikhan Geibprasert, Ravi Menezes, Ronit Agid, Karel G Terbrugge, Michael L Schwartz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radiosurgery as a potential treatment modality for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM) has 60% to 90% obliteration rates.
OBJECTIVE: To test whether AVM angioarchitecture determines obliteration rate after radiosurgery.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 139 patients with AVM who underwent radiosurgery. Multiple angioarchitectural characteristics were reviewed on conventional angiogram on the day of radiosurgery: enlargement of feeding arteries, flow-related or intranidal aneurysms, perinidal angiogenesis, arteriovenous transit time, nidus type, venous ectasia, focal pouches, venous rerouting, and presence of a pseudophlebitic pattern. The radiation plan was reviewed for nidus volume and eloquence of AVM location. A chart review was performed to determine clinical presentation and previous treatment. Outcome was dichotomized into complete/incomplete obliteration, and various statistics were performed, examining whether outcome status was associated with the investigated factors.
RESULTS: Marginal dose ranged from 15 to 25 Gy (mean, 18.8 Gy), with lower doses prescribed in eloquent locations. Sizes of AVMs ranged from 0.08 to 21 cm (mean, 3.78 ± 4.19 cm). Complete AVM obliteration was achieved in 92 patients (66%) and was related to these independent factors: noneloquent location (odds ratio [OR], 3.20), size (OR, 0.88), low flow (OR, 3.47), no or mild arterial enlargement (OR, 3.32), and absence of perinidal angiogenesis (OR, 2.61). Concerning the 3 last angioarchitectural characteristics, if no or only a single factor was present in an individual patient (n = 92 patients), obliteration was observed in 74 (80%); if 2 or 3 factors were present (n = 47), obliteration was observed in 18 patients (38%; OR, 6.62).
CONCLUSION: Angioarchitectural factors that indicate high flow are associated with a lower rate of AVM obliteration after radiosurgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22922676     DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826f79ec

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of Angioarchitectural Features of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformation by Susceptibility Weighted Imaging.

Authors:  Chun-Xue Wu; Li Ma; Xu-Zhu Chen; Xiao-Lin Chen; Yu Chen; Yuan-Li Zhao; Christopher Hess; Helen Kim; Heng-Wei Jin; Jun Ma
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.104

2.  Management of brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Sherri A Braksick; Jennifer E Fugate
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations in a retrospective study group of 33 children: the importance of radiobiological scores.

Authors:  Jody Filippo Capitanio; Pietro Panni; Alberto Luigi Gallotti; Carmen Rosaria Gigliotti; Francesco Scomazzoni; Stefania Acerno; Antonella Del Vecchio; Pietro Mortini
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Subsequent haemorrhage in children with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation: Higher risk with unbalanced inflow and outflow angioarchitecture.

Authors:  Li Ma; Xiao-Lin Chen; Yu Chen; Chun-Xue Wu; Jun Ma; Yuan-Li Zhao
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Arteriovenous malformation of the vestibulocochlear nerve.

Authors:  Adam Tucker; Masao Tsuji; Yoshitaka Yamada; Kenichiro Hanabusa; Tohru Ukita; Hiroji Miyake; Takehisa Ohmura
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.337

6.  Stereotactic radiosurgery with versus without prior Onyx embolization for brain arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Ching-Jen Chen; Dale Ding; Cheng-Chia Lee; Kathryn N Kearns; I Jonathan Pomeraniec; Christopher P Cifarelli; David E Arsanious; Roman Liscak; Jaromir Hanuska; Brian J Williams; Mehran B Yusuf; Shiao Y Woo; Natasha Ironside; Rebecca M Burke; Ronald E Warnick; Daniel M Trifiletti; David Mathieu; Monica Mureb; Carolina Benjamin; Douglas Kondziolka; Caleb E Feliciano; Rafael Rodriguez-Mercado; Kevin M Cockroft; Scott Simon; Heath B Mackley; Samer G Zammar; Neel T Patel; Varun Padmanaban; Nathan Beatson; Anissa Saylany; John Y K Lee; Jason P Sheehan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.408

7.  RNA Sequencing Reveals the Activation of Wnt Signaling in Low Flow Rate Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Ran Huo; Weilun Fu; Hao Li; Yuming Jiao; Zihan Yan; Linjian Wang; Jie Wang; Shuo Wang; Yong Cao; Jizong Zhao
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Venous Outflow for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: Overview and Treatment Implications.

Authors:  C Osorno-Cruz; Z Hasanpour; R Peart; W Dodd; D Laurent; S Aghili-Mehrizi; B Lucke-Wold; N Chalouhi
Journal:  Int J Neurobiol       Date:  2022-08-16

Review 9.  Chinese Cerebrovascular Neurosurgery Society and Chinese Interventional & Hybrid Operation Society, of Chinese Stroke Association Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in Eloquent Areas.

Authors:  Mingze Wang; Yuming Jiao; Chaofan Zeng; Chaoqi Zhang; Qiheng He; Yi Yang; Wenjun Tu; Hancheng Qiu; Huaizhang Shi; Dong Zhang; Dezhi Kang; Shuo Wang; A-Li Liu; Weijian Jiang; Yong Cao; Jizong Zhao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Signal intensity ratio of draining vein on silent MR angiography as an indicator of high-flow arteriovenous shunt in brain arteriovenous malformation.

Authors:  Chun-Xue Wu; Zhen-Xiang Zang; Tao Hong; Meng-Qi Dong; Yi Shan; Zhi-Lian Zhao; Cheng-Bei Hou; Jie Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.