BACKGROUND: Reducing brain β-amyloid (Aβ) via inhibition of β-secretase, or inhibition/modulation of γ-secretase, has been widely pursued as a potential disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Compounds that act through these mechanisms have been screened and characterized with Aβ lowering in the brain and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as the primary pharmacological end point. Interpretation and translation of the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship for these compounds is complicated by the relatively slow Aβ turnover process in these compartments. OBJECTIVE: To understand Aβ turnover kinetics in preclinical species and humans. METHODS: We collected CSF Aβ dynamic data after β- or γ-secretase inhibitor treatment from in-house experiments and the public domain, and analyzed the data using PK/PD modeling to obtain CSF Aβ turnover rates (kout) in the mouse, dog, monkey and human. RESULTS: The kout for CSF Aβ40 follows allometry (kout = 0.395 × body weight(-0.351)). The kout for CSF Aβ40 is approximately 2-fold higher than the turnover of CSF in rodents, but in higher species, the two are comparable. CONCLUSION: The turnover of CSF Aβ40 was systematically examined, for the first time, in multiple species through quantitative modeling of multiple data sets. Our result suggests that the clearance mechanisms for CSF Aβ in rodents may be different from those in the higher species. The understanding of Aβ turnover has considerable implications for the discovery and development of Aβ-lowering therapeutics, as illustrated from the perspectives of preclinical PK/PD characterization and preclinical-to-clinical translation.
BACKGROUND: Reducing brain β-amyloid (Aβ) via inhibition of β-secretase, or inhibition/modulation of γ-secretase, has been widely pursued as a potential disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease. Compounds that act through these mechanisms have been screened and characterized with Aβ lowering in the brain and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as the primary pharmacological end point. Interpretation and translation of the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship for these compounds is complicated by the relatively slow Aβ turnover process in these compartments. OBJECTIVE: To understand Aβ turnover kinetics in preclinical species and humans. METHODS: We collected CSF Aβ dynamic data after β- or γ-secretase inhibitor treatment from in-house experiments and the public domain, and analyzed the data using PK/PD modeling to obtain CSF Aβ turnover rates (kout) in the mouse, dog, monkey and human. RESULTS: The kout for CSF Aβ40 follows allometry (kout = 0.395 × body weight(-0.351)). The kout for CSF Aβ40 is approximately 2-fold higher than the turnover of CSF in rodents, but in higher species, the two are comparable. CONCLUSION: The turnover of CSF Aβ40 was systematically examined, for the first time, in multiple species through quantitative modeling of multiple data sets. Our result suggests that the clearance mechanisms for CSF Aβ in rodents may be different from those in the higher species. The understanding of Aβ turnover has considerable implications for the discovery and development of Aβ-lowering therapeutics, as illustrated from the perspectives of preclinical PK/PD characterization and preclinical-to-clinical translation.
Authors: Peter A Chiarelli; Richard A Revia; Zachary R Stephen; Kui Wang; Mike Jeon; Veronica Nelson; Forrest M Kievit; Jonathan Sham; Richard G Ellenbogen; Hans-Peter Kiem; Miqin Zhang Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Ibrahim González-Marrero; Lydia Giménez-Llort; Conrad E Johanson; Emilia María Carmona-Calero; Leandro Castañeyra-Ruiz; José Miguel Brito-Armas; Agustín Castañeyra-Perdomo; Rafael Castro-Fuentes Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 5.505
Authors: Yumi Yamamoto; Pyry A Välitalo; Dirk-Jan van den Berg; Robin Hartman; Willem van den Brink; Yin Cheong Wong; Dymphy R Huntjens; Johannes H Proost; An Vermeulen; Walter Krauwinkel; Suruchi Bakshi; Vincent Aranzana-Climent; Sandrine Marchand; Claire Dahyot-Fizelier; William Couet; Meindert Danhof; Johan G C van Hasselt; Elizabeth C M de Lange Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Herman Borghys; Bianca Van Broeck; Deborah Dhuyvetter; Tom Jacobs; Katja de Waepenaert; Tim Erkens; Melissa Brooks; Sandy Thevarkunnel; Joseph A Araujo Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.472