Literature DB >> 22922429

Salivary progesterone is associated with reduced coherence of attentional, cognitive, and motivational systems.

Oliver C Schultheiss1, Mariya Patalakh, Andreas G Rösch.   

Abstract

The present study tested whether the hypothesis that high levels of progesterone (P) have a decoupling effect on the function of the brain hemispheres (Hausmann & Gunturkun, 2000) also extends to attentional functions, referential connections between verbal and nonverbal representations and the degree to which implicit motivational needs match a person's explicit goal commitments. Participants (28 women on oral contraceptives, 14 naturally cycling women, 50 men) completed the Lateralized Attention Network Task (Greene et al., 2008), a measure of the alerting, orienting, and conflict-resolution functions of attention for each hemisphere; a measure of referential competence (i.e., the ability to quickly name nonverbal information); a measure of the implicit motives power, achievement, and affiliation; and a content-matched personal goal inventory. In addition, they provided a saliva sample that was assayed for P and cortisol (C). Higher levels of P were associated with lower interhemispheric correlations for alerting and orienting, but with a higher correlation of conflict-resolution performance. Higher P was also associated with longer interhemispheric transfer time, lower congruence between implicit motives and explicit goal commitments and, after controlling for C, with lower referential competence. These results suggest that (a) P is associated with the degree to which attentional functions are correlated between hemispheres, although in a different direction for more posterior (alerting and orienting: decoupling) than for more anterior functions (conflict resolution: coupling), (b) that high P is associated with other indicators of reduced functional coherence between cognitive systems (longer interhemispheric transfer time, lower referential competence), and (c) that high P is also associated with low coherence between implicit and explicit motivational systems.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22922429     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  4 in total

1.  Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power.

Authors:  Martin G Köllner; Oliver C Schultheiss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-08

2.  Sex related biases for attending to object color versus object position are reflected in reaction time and accuracy.

Authors:  Robert F McGivern; Matthew Mosso; Adam Freudenberg; Robert J Handa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The Relationship Between Multidimensional Motivation and Endocrine-Related Responses: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Richard P Steel; Nicolette C Bishop; Ian M Taylor
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-01-29

4.  Relationships between implicit motives, self-attributed motives, and personal goal commitments.

Authors:  Maika Rawolle; Maria Schultheiss; Oliver C Schultheiss
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-12-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.