Literature DB >> 2292216

Intraoperative imprint cytology: its significance as a diagnostic adjunct.

K Kim1, E R Phillips, M Paolino.   

Abstract

We retrospectively evaluated 664 specimens submitted for intraoperative frozen-section analysis for which cytologic imprints or smears were also prepared; 238 (36%) were malignant neoplasms. These preparations were retrospectively evaluated independently by three reviewers of varied experience in the detection of malignancy. The number of false-positive and false-negative results were recorded, and various assessment parameters (sensitivity, specificity, efficiency, and predictive value) were calculated. The imprint was of chief value as an adjunct to the frozen section, particularly in avoiding false-positive and, to a lesser extent, false-negative interpretations. Experience with the use of intraoperative cytology demonstrated the technique to be of value in providing abbreviated preparation time (3-5 min); supportive diagnostic information when frozen section was equivocal; diagnostic information when frozen-section evaluation could not be done (e.g., excessively small sample); contributory information for final diagnosis on difficult cases; and excellent teaching material for cytopathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2292216     DOI: 10.1002/dc.2840060503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  2 in total

1.  Comparative study of intra-operative cytology, frozen sections, and histology of tumor and tumor-like lesions of nose and paranasal sinuses.

Authors:  Js Nigam; V Misra; V Dhingra; S Jain; K Varma; A Singh
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Imprint cytology.

Authors:  V Kamatchi; N Aravindha Babu; S Leena Sankari; E Rajesh
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.