Literature DB >> 22922135

A numerical investigation of vapor intrusion--the dynamic response of contaminant vapors to rainfall events.

Rui Shen1, Kelly G Pennell, Eric M Suuberg.   

Abstract

The U.S. government and various agencies have published guidelines for field investigation of vapor intrusion, most of which suggest soil gas sampling as an integral part of the investigation. Contaminant soil gas data are often relatively more stable than indoor air vapor concentration measurements, but meteorological conditions might influence soil gas values. Although a few field and numerical studies have considered some temporal effects on soil gas vapor transport, a full explanation of the contaminant vapor concentration response to rainfall events is not available. This manuscript seeks to demonstrate the effects on soil vapor transport during and after different rainfall events, by applying a coupled numerical model of fluid flow and vapor transport. Both a single rainfall event and seasonal rainfall events were modeled. For the single rainfall event models, the vapor response process could be divided into three steps: namely, infiltration, water redistribution, and establishment of a water lens atop the groundwater source. In the infiltration step, rainfall intensity was found to determine the speed of the wetting front and wash-out effect on the vapor. The passage of the wetting front led to an increase of the vapor concentration in both the infiltration and water redistribution steps and this effect is noted at soil probes located 1m below the ground surface. When the mixing of groundwater with infiltrated water was not allowed, a clean water lens accumulated above the groundwater source and led to a capping effect which can reduce diffusion rates of contaminant from the source. Seasonal rainfall with short time intervals involved superposition of the individual rainfall events. This modeling results indicated that for relatively deeper soil that the infiltration wetting front could not flood, the effects were damped out in less than a month after rain; while in the long term (years), possible formation of a water lens played a larger role in determining the vapor intrusion risk. In addition, soil organic carbon retarded the transport process, and damped the contaminant concentration fluctuations.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22922135      PMCID: PMC3756695          DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of vapor intrusion using controlled building pressure.

Authors:  Thomas E McHugh; Lila Beckley; Danielle Bailey; Kyle Gorder; Erik Dettenmaier; Ignacio Rivera-Duarte; Samuel Brock; Ian C MacGregor
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Sensitivity analysis on parameters and processes affecting vapor intrusion risk.

Authors:  Sara Picone; Johan Valstar; Pauline van Gaans; Tim Grotenhuis; Huub Rijnaarts
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.742

3.  Gas-phase diffusivity and tortuosity of structured soils.

Authors:  Andreas H Kristensen; Anne Thorbjørn; Maria P Jensen; Mette Pedersen; Per Moldrup
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.188

4.  Effect of vapor source-building separation and building construction on soil vapor intrusion as studied with a three-dimensional numerical model.

Authors:  Lilian D V Abreu; Paul C Johnson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Temporal moisture content variability beneath and external to a building and the potential effects on vapor intrusion risk assessment.

Authors:  Fred D Tillman; James W Weaver
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  Comparison of the Johnson-Ettinger vapor intrusion screening model predictions with full three-dimensional model results.

Authors:  Yijun Yao; Rui Shen; Kelly G Pennell; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  Review of unsaturated-zone transport and attenuation of volatile organic compound (VOC) plumes leached from shallow source zones.

Authors:  Michael O Rivett; Gary P Wealthall; Rachel A Dearden; Todd A McAlary
Journal:  J Contam Hydrol       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 3.188

8.  Simulation of the Vapor Intrusion Process for Non-Homogeneous Soils Using a Three-Dimensional Numerical Model.

Authors:  Ozgur Bozkurt; Kelly G Pennell; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Ground Water Monit Remediat       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 2.019

9.  Indoor vapor intrusion with oxygen-limited biodegradation for a subsurface gasoline source.

Authors:  George E DeVaull
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Influence of Soil Moisture on Soil Gas Vapor Concentration for Vapor Intrusion.

Authors:  Rui Shen; Kelly G Pennell; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.907

2.  A two-dimensional analytical model of vapor intrusion involving vertical heterogeneity.

Authors:  Yijun Yao; Iason Verginelli; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Water Resour Res       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.240

3.  Analytical Quantification of the Subslab Volatile Organic Vapor Concentration from a Non-uniform Source.

Authors:  Rui Shen; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Environ Model Softw       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.288

4.  Impacts of Changes of Indoor Air Pressure and Air Exchange Rate in Vapor Intrusion Scenarios.

Authors:  Rui Shen; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Build Environ       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 6.456

5.  Investigating the Role of Soil Texture in Vapor Intrusion from Groundwater Sources.

Authors:  Yijun Yao; Yue Wang; Zhong Zhong; Mengling Tang; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.751

6.  Measuring Vapor Intrusion: From Source Science Politics to a Transdisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  Peter C Little; Kelly G Pennell
Journal:  Environ Sociol       Date:  2016-10-12

7.  Estimation of Contaminant Subslab Concentration in Vapor Intrusion Including Lateral Source-Building Separation.

Authors:  Yijun Yao; Rui Shen; Kelly G Pennell; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Vadose Zone J       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.289

8.  Three-dimensional vapor intrusion modeling approach that combines wind and stack effects on indoor, atmospheric, and subsurface domains.

Authors:  Elham Shirazi; Kelly G Pennell
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.238

9.  Field data and numerical modeling: A multiple lines of evidence approach for assessing vapor intrusion exposure risks.

Authors:  Kelly G Pennell; Madeleine K Scammell; Michael D McClean; Eric M Suuberg; Ali Moradi; Mohammadyousef Roghani; Jennifer Ames; Leigh Friguglietti; Paul A Indeglia; Rui Shen; Yijun Yao; Wendy J Heiger-Bernays
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  A numerical investigation of oxygen concentration dependence on biodegradation rate laws in vapor intrusion.

Authors:  Yijun Yao; Rui Shen; Kelly G Pennel; Eric M Suuberg
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.238

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.