Literature DB >> 22921871

Oral exposure to Mal d 1 affects the immune response in patients with birch pollen allergy.

Marija Geroldinger-Simic1, Tamar Kinaciyan, Birgit Nagl, Ursula Baumgartner-Durchschlag, Hans Huber, Christof Ebner, Jonas Lidholm, Detlef Bartel, Stefan Vieths, Beatrice Jahn-Schmid, Barbara Bohle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antibodies and T cells specific for the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 cross-react with structurally related food allergens, such as Mal d 1 in apple.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effects of oral uptake of Mal d 1 on the allergen-specific immune response in patients with birch pollen allergy.
METHODS: Patients received 50 μg of rBet v 1 sublingually on 2 consecutive days outside of the birch pollen season. One year later, equal amounts of rMal d 1 were administered. Blood samples were collected before and after oral exposure, as well as before and after the intermediate birch pollen season. Allergen-specific IgE levels were determined by using ImmunoCAP. Proliferation of allergen-stimulated PBMCs was assessed, as well as the expression of IL-5, IL-13, IL-10, IFN-γ, and forkhead box protein 3 (Foxp3) in isolated T cells (real-time PCR). Allergen-specific T-cell lines were analyzed for epitope recognition.
RESULTS: Orally administered Bet v 1 transiently reduced Bet v 1-specific serum IgE levels, as well as Bet v 1- and Mal d 1-induced T-cell proliferation, and enhanced the expression of IL-5, IL-10, and Foxp3. Orally applied Mal d 1 significantly decreased Bet v 1- and Mal d 1-specific IgE levels and induced IL-5 and IL-10 but no Foxp3 expression. In contrast to Bet v 1, Mal d 1 triggered IFN-γ production and T cells with a different epitope repertoire. Inhalation of birch pollen significantly enhanced allergen-specific IgE levels, T-cell proliferation, and IL-5, IL-10, IL-13, and Foxp3 expression.
CONCLUSION: Two sublingual administrations of 50 μg of Mal d 1 were well tolerated and induced transient immune responses seen during peripheral tolerance development. Thus recombinant Mal d 1 might be suitable and relevant for sublingual treatment of birch pollen-related apple allergy.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22921871     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.06.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  14 in total

Review 1.  The Role of the Environment in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Paul J Dowling; Hannah Neuhaus; Brooke I Polk
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 8.667

2.  Correlation of sensitizing capacity and T-cell recognition within the Bet v 1 family.

Authors:  Claudia Kitzmüller; Nora Zulehner; Anargyros Roulias; Peter Briza; Fatima Ferreira; Ingrid Faé; Gottfried F Fischer; Barbara Bohle
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 3.  Immunoglobulin E-Mediated Autoimmunity.

Authors:  Marcus Maurer; Sabine Altrichter; Oliver Schmetzer; Jörg Scheffel; Martin K Church; Martin Metz
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Sublingual immunotherapy with recombinant Mal d 1 downregulates the allergen-specific Th2 response.

Authors:  Claudia Kitzmüller; Beatrice Jahn-Schmid; Tamar Kinaciyan; Barbara Bohle
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 5.  Pollen-Food Allergy Syndrome: A not so Rare Disease in Childhood.

Authors:  Carla Mastrorilli; Fabio Cardinale; Arianna Giannetti; Carlo Caffarelli
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Induction of eosinophilic esophagitis by sublingual pollen immunotherapy.

Authors:  Stephan Miehlke; Oral Alpan; Sören Schröder; Alex Straumann
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-03

7.  Recombinant Mal d 1 facilitates sublingual challenge tests of birch pollen-allergic patients with apple allergy.

Authors:  T Kinaciyan; B Nagl; S Faustmann; S Kopp; M Wolkersdorfer; B Bohle
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 13.146

8.  The quantity and quality of α-gal-specific antibodies differ in individuals with and without delayed red meat allergy.

Authors:  D Kollmann; B Nagl; C Ebner; W Emminger; S Wöhrl; C Kitzmüller; S Vrtala; A Mangold; H-J Ankersmit; B Bohle
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 13.146

9.  Allergen-specific immunotherapy with apples: selected cultivars could be a promising tool for birch pollen allergy.

Authors:  B Nothegger; N Reider; C E Covaciu; V Cova; L Ahammer; R Eidelpes; J Unterhauser; S Platzgummer; M Tollinger; T Letschka; K Eisendle
Journal:  J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 6.166

10.  The Effect of Birch Pollen Immunotherapy on Apple and rMal d 1 Challenges in Adults with Apple Allergy.

Authors:  Johanna Petronella Margaretha van der Valk; Birgit Nagl; Roy Gerth van Wljk; Barbara Bohle; Nicolette Wilma de Jong
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.