Literature DB >> 22921702

Determination of ureter stent appearance on dual-energy computed tomography scan.

Maria A Jepperson1, David D Thiel, Joesph G Cernigliaro, Gregory A Broderick, Alexander S Parker, William E Haley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) properties of 7 commonly used ureteral stents to optimize stent selection for calculi monitored using DECT. The use of DECT to evaluate renal and ureteral calculi has recently increased.
METHODS: Seven stents were individually placed in a fish bowl phantom and imaged using a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash CT scanner. DECT peak tube potentials of 80 and 140 kVp and 100 and 140 kVp were used, reflecting our current dual-energy protocols. These were compared to 31 in vivo stents of known composition. The data were reconstructed on a multimodality WorkPlace (Siemens) using CT syngo Post-Processing Suite software.
RESULTS: The average patient age was 64 years (range 27-90). The average body mass index was 31.9 kg/m(2) (range 24-51.6). Of the 27 patients, 4 had uric acid stones and 22 had calcium-based stones; 1 patient had undergone renal transplantation. No difference was seen in the dual-energy characterization of stents from the same manufacturer. All imaged Cook and Bard stents had a dual-energy characterization that approached that of calcium stones (blue). All Boston Scientific and Gyrus ACMI stents had a dual-energy characterization resembling that of uric acid stones (red).
CONCLUSION: The present study evaluated the stent appearance on DECT for various stent manufacturers. This information will aid in the optimal stent selection for patients undergoing treatment of renal calculi and followed up with DECT.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22921702      PMCID: PMC3939716          DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy computed tomography: an emerging application.

Authors:  Ruth Eliahou; Guy Hidas; Mordechai Duvdevani; Jacob Sosna
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.875

2.  Quantitative imaging of element composition and mass fraction using dual-energy CT: three-material decomposition.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Lifeng Yu; Andrew N Primak; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Ureteral stents: new ideas, new designs.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Al-Aown; Iason Kyriazis; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Pantelis Kraniotis; Christos Rigopoulos; Dimitrios Karnabatidis; Theodore Petsas; Evangelos Liatsikos
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

Review 4.  Genitourinary applications of dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Terri J Vrtiska; Naoki Takahashi; Joel G Fletcher; Robert P Hartman; Lifeng Yu; Akira Kawashima
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  In vivo evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary stones using dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Giuseppina Manglaviti; Silvia Tresoldi; Chiara Stefania Guerrer; Giovanni Di Leo; Emanuele Montanari; Francesco Sardanelli; Gianpaolo Cornalba
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Andrew N Primak; Joel G Fletcher; Terri J Vrtiska; Oleksandr P Dzyubak; John C Lieske; Molly E Jackson; James C Williams; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Dual source computed tomography: a novel technique to determine stone composition.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Satomi Kawamoto; Elliot Fishman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 8.  Polymers as ureteral stents.

Authors:  Nandakumar Venkatesan; Sunil Shroff; Karthik Jayachandran; Mukesh Doble
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Dual energy CT characterization of urinary calculi: initial in vitro and clinical experience.

Authors:  Anno Graser; Thorsten R C Johnson; Markus Bader; Michael Staehler; Nicolas Haseke; Konstantin Nikolaou; Maximilian F Reiser; Christian G Stief; Christoph R Becker
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Renal stone assessment with dual-energy multidetector CT and advanced postprocessing techniques: improved characterization of renal stone composition--pilot study.

Authors:  Daniel T Boll; Neil A Patil; Erik K Paulson; Elmar M Merkle; W Neal Simmons; Sean A Pierre; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous stone removal: new approaches to access and imaging.

Authors:  Rick C Slater; Michael Ost
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Characterization of ureteral stents by dual-energy computed tomography: Clinical implications.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; William E Haley; Maria A Jepperson; Michael J Wehle; Joseph G Cernigliaro
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

3.  In vivo comparison of radiation exposure of dual-energy CT versus low-dose CT versus standard CT for imaging urinary calculi.

Authors:  Maria A Jepperson; Joseph G Cernigliaro; El-Sayed H Ibrahim; Richard L Morin; William E Haley; David D Thiel
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Three-dimensional dual-energy computed tomography for enhancing stone/stent contrasting and stone visualization in urolithiasis.

Authors:  El-Sayed H Ibrahim; William E Haley; Maria A Jepperson; David D Thiel; Michael J Wehle; Joseph G Cernigliaro
Journal:  Case Rep Urol       Date:  2013-07-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.