Literature DB >> 22921320

Influence of cervical spine position, turning time, and cervical segment on cadaver intradiscal pressure during cervical spinal manipulative therapy.

Li-Ping Wu1, Yuan-Qiao Huang, Wei-Hua Zhou, Das Manas, Wei-Dong Zhao, Juan-Zhi Chen, Qin-Shui Yin, Li-Heng Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine influences of cervical spine positions, turning times, and cervical segments on cadaver intradiscal pressure (IDP) during cervical spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).
METHODS: We simulated cervical SMT with stretching and rotation on 7 fresh adult cadaver specimens in the material test system machine. The changes in IDP for cervical intervertebral disks (C3/4, C4/5, and C5/6) during 4 different stages of cervical SMT (physiologic state, end of the traction stage, turning stage, and finish time) were monitored. Five different cervical positions (extension 20°, extension 10°, neutral position, flexion 10°, flexion 20°) and 3 different turning times (0.06, 0.11, 0.16 second) of IDP were monitored, using micropressure sensors.
RESULTS: The variable tendency of cervical IDP presents a "V"-shaped curve during SMT. The 4 stages of SMT had significantly different IDP (F=5498.956; P<.001). There were also significant differences in IDP between 5 cervical positions ([F=1371.216; P<.001], [flexion 20°>flexion 10°>neutral position>extension 10°>extension 20°]), 3 turning times ([F=419.530; P<.001], [0.06>0.11>0.16 seconds]), and 3 cervical segments ([F=84.282; P<.001], [C3/4<C4/5<C5/6]). Intradiscal pressure was lowest at 20° extension combined with a turning time of 0.16 second.
CONCLUSION: Different cervical positions, turning times, and cervical segments largely influence IDP during the process of SMT. Further research using human subjects should determine if these findings contribute to greater patient comfort, safety, and clinical efficacy with SMT.
Copyright © 2012 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22921320     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  4 in total

1.  A finite element study of traditional Chinese cervical manipulation.

Authors:  Zhen Deng; Kuan Wang; Huihao Wang; Tianying Lan; Hongsheng Zhan; Wenxin Niu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Cervical disc degeneration: important considerations for the manual therapist.

Authors:  Brian T Swanson; Douglas Creighton
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2021-11-25

3.  Intradiscal Pressure Changes during Manual Cervical Distraction: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  M R Gudavalli; T Potluri; G Carandang; R M Havey; L I Voronov; J M Cox; R M Rowell; R A Kruse; G C Joachim; A G Patwardhan; C N R Henderson; C Goertz
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 2.629

4.  In vivo measurement of intradiscal pressure changes related to thrust and non-thrust spinal manipulation in an animal model: a pilot study.

Authors:  William R Reed; Michael A K Liebschner; Carla R Lima; Harshvardhan Singh; Christopher P Hurt; Daniel F Martins; James M Cox; Maruti R Gudavalli
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2022-09-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.