OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of primary stenting for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document II on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients with TASC C and D de novo femoropopliteal lesions were treated with the same endovascular technique by implanting a primary nitinol self-expanding stent (LifeStent(®), Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, AZ, USA). Patients were included in a single-centre registry and prospectively followed up. The primary end point was primary sustained clinical improvement after 12 months. Secondary end points were secondary sustained clinical improvement, primary and secondary patency rates, freedom from target lesion revascularisation (TLR), freedom from target extremity revascularisation (TER) and stent fracture rate. RESULTS: We enrolled 58 patients (62 limbs) suffering from either claudication (40.3%) or critical limb ischaemia (59.7%). Lesions were either TASC C (62.9%) or TASC D (37.1%). Median length of the treated segment was 220 ± 160 mm. The mean number of stents was 2.2. Mean follow-up was 17 months, with one patient lost to follow-up. At 1 year, the primary end point was 68.6% while secondary sustained clinical improvement was 82.6%. Freedom from TLR and TER rates were 81.1% and 96.3%. Primary and secondary patencies were 66% and 80.9%. One-year primary and secondary sustained clinical improvement rates were 76.7% ± 7.2 for TASC C and 46.3% ± 11.1 for TASC D (p = 0.03) and 87.6% ± 5.9 for TASC C and 67.3% ± 11.3 for TASC D (p = 0.09), respectively. The ankle-brachial pressure index increased from 0.58 to 0.94 (p = 0.001) at 1 year and the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) was 19.3%. Stent fracture and disconnection rate was 17.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Primary stenting of TASC C and D lesions appears to be safe and efficient given the high-sustained clinical improvement and the low rate of ISR observed in our study. Endovascular treatment of such long and severe lesions exposes to high rate of stent fractures, which should not be a concern given their low clinical impact.
OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the safety and the efficacy of primary stenting for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document II on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS:Patients with TASC C and D de novo femoropopliteal lesions were treated with the same endovascular technique by implanting a primary nitinol self-expanding stent (LifeStent(®), Bard Peripheral Vascular, Tempe, AZ, USA). Patients were included in a single-centre registry and prospectively followed up. The primary end point was primary sustained clinical improvement after 12 months. Secondary end points were secondary sustained clinical improvement, primary and secondary patency rates, freedom from target lesion revascularisation (TLR), freedom from target extremity revascularisation (TER) and stent fracture rate. RESULTS: We enrolled 58 patients (62 limbs) suffering from either claudication (40.3%) or critical limb ischaemia (59.7%). Lesions were either TASC C (62.9%) or TASC D (37.1%). Median length of the treated segment was 220 ± 160 mm. The mean number of stents was 2.2. Mean follow-up was 17 months, with one patient lost to follow-up. At 1 year, the primary end point was 68.6% while secondary sustained clinical improvement was 82.6%. Freedom from TLR and TER rates were 81.1% and 96.3%. Primary and secondary patencies were 66% and 80.9%. One-year primary and secondary sustained clinical improvement rates were 76.7% ± 7.2 for TASC C and 46.3% ± 11.1 for TASC D (p = 0.03) and 87.6% ± 5.9 for TASC C and 67.3% ± 11.3 for TASC D (p = 0.09), respectively. The ankle-brachial pressure index increased from 0.58 to 0.94 (p = 0.001) at 1 year and the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) was 19.3%. Stent fracture and disconnection rate was 17.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Primary stenting of TASC C and D lesions appears to be safe and efficient given the high-sustained clinical improvement and the low rate of ISR observed in our study. Endovascular treatment of such long and severe lesions exposes to high rate of stent fractures, which should not be a concern given their low clinical impact.
Authors: Patrick A Stone; John E Campbell; Rashi Fischer; David Phang; Stephanie N Thompson; Neil Dippel; Albeir Mousa Journal: Vascular Date: 2014-08-13 Impact factor: 1.285
Authors: Ehrin J Armstrong; Haseeb Saeed; Bejan Alvandi; Satinder Singh; Gagan D Singh; Khung Keong Yeo; David Anderson; Gregory G Westin; David L Dawson; William C Pevec; John R Laird Journal: J Endovasc Ther Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.487
Authors: Soo Buem Cho; Ho Cheol Choi; EunJin Bae; Tae Jin Park; Hye Jin Baek; Sung Eun Park; Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Jin Il Moon; Bo Hwa Choi; Kyungsoo Bae; Kyung Nyeo Jeon Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 1.817