Literature DB >> 22920695

Cone-beam computed tomography transverse analysis. Part I: Normative data.

R Matthew Miner1, Salem Al Qabandi, Paul H Rigali, Leslie A Will.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The application of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in orthodontics ushered in a new era in 3-dimensional analysis that promises to provide more comprehensive understanding of craniofacial skeletal anatomy. That promise is now being realized in multiple studies. The purposes of this study were to investigate a portion of transverse dimension relationships by using CBCT and to propose a transverse analysis to assist practitioners with treatment decisions.
METHODS: The CBCT scans of 241 patients with and without crossbite were analyzed to assess the width of the jaws and the inclination of the first molars. The dental and skeletal measurements were compared between the noncrossbite and the crossbite groups.
RESULTS: The noncrossbite group included patients who had apparently normal transverse relationships, but also a surprising number of patients with an obvious skeletal transverse discrepancy masked by dental compensation. The noncrossbite patients with molar inclinations within 1 SD of the mean were defined as the control group, and those with dental compensations were identified as either superior convergent or inferior convergent. The obvious unilateral crossbite patients demonstrated dental compensation in the maxillary first molar on the noncrossbite side, whereas the obvious bilateral crossbite patients had normal dental inclinations.
CONCLUSIONS: Skeletally, both the bilateral and unilateral crossbite groups had narrower maxillary widths than did the controls, but also wider mandibles, with more severe bilateral crossbites. Dentally, the unilateral crossbite group had more upright teeth on the noncrossbite side. In the noncrossbite groups with dental compensations, the superior convergent and inferior convergent differences in both dental and skeletal characteristics were marked. Patients without crossbites can have significant discrepancies that might warrant treatment.
Copyright © 2012 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22920695     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.04.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  11 in total

1.  Cervical vertebrae maturation index estimates on cone beam CT: 3D reconstructions vs sagittal sections.

Authors:  Marco A E Bonfim; André L F Costa; Acácio Fuziy; Michel E L Ximenez; Flávio A Cotrim-Ferreira; Rívea I Ferreira-Santos
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Is there a relationship between dental crowding and the size of the maxillary or mandibular apical base?

Authors:  Aaron M Crossley; Phillip M Campbell; Larry P Tadlock; Emet Schneiderman; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Quad-helix compression to decompensate molar inclination prior to skeletal expansion.

Authors:  Carmen Lorente; Pedro Lorente; Maria Perez-Vela; Cristina Esquinas; Teresa Lorente
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion.

Authors:  Ildeu Andrade; Marco Aurélio Benini Paschoal; Natália Couto Figueiredo
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2021-10-25

5.  Rapid Maxillary Expansion Has a Beneficial Effect on the Ventilation in Children With Nasal Septal Deviation: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Study.

Authors:  Shuai Chen; Jingying Wang; Xun Xi; Yi Zhao; Hong Liu; Dongxu Liu
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.418

6.  Comparison of transverse analysis between posteroanterior cephalogram and cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Kyung-Min Lee; Hyeon-Shik Hwang; Jin-Hyoung Cho
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The role of occlusal curvatures and maxillary arch dimensions in patients with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders.

Authors:  Georgios Kanavakis; Noshir Mehta
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Correlation between the transverse dimension of the maxilla, upper airway obstructive site, and OSA severity.

Authors:  Eric Thuler; Fábio A W Rabelo; Mariane Yui; Quedayr Tominaga; Vanier Dos Santos; Sergio Samir Arap
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.324

Review 9.  Diagnostic methods for assessing maxillary skeletal and dental transverse deficiencies: A systematic review.

Authors:  Dena Sawchuk; Kris Currie; Manuel Lagravere Vich; Juan Martin Palomo; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Reader's Forum.

Authors:  Mi-Young Lee
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.