Literature DB >> 22920450

Relationship between ASIA examination and functional outcomes in the NeuroRecovery Network Locomotor Training Program.

Jeffrey J Buehner1, Gail F Forrest, Mary Schmidt-Read, Susan White, Keith Tansey, D Michele Basso.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of locomotor training on: (1) the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury examination; (2) locomotion (gait speed, distance); (3) balance; and (4) functional gait speed stratifications after chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI).
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort.
SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation centers in the NeuroRecovery Network (NRN). PARTICIPANTS: Individuals (n=225) with American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grade C or D chronic motor incomplete SCI having completed locomotor training in the NRN. INTERVENTION: The NRN Locomotor Training Program consists of manual-facilitated body weight-supported standing and stepping on a treadmill and overground. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: AIS classification, lower extremity pin prick, light touch and motor scores, ten-meter walk and six-minute walk tests, and the Berg Balance Scale.
RESULTS: Significant gains occurred in lower extremity motor scores but not in sensory scores, and these were only weakly related to gait speed and distance. Final Berg Balance Scale scores and initial lower extremity motor scores were positively related. Although 70% of subjects showed significantly improved gait speed after locomotor training, only 8% showed AIS category conversion.
CONCLUSIONS: Locomotor training improves gait speed to levels sufficient for independent in-home or community ambulation after chronic motor incomplete SCI. Changes in lower extremity motor and sensory scores do not capture the full extent of functional recovery, nor predict responsiveness to locomotor training. Functional classification based on gait speed may provide an effective measure of treatment efficacy or functional improvement after incomplete SCI.
Copyright © 2012 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22920450     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  19 in total

1.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of task-specific rehabilitation interventions for improving independent sitting and standing function in spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Cynthia M Tse; Amanda E Chisholm; Tania Lam; Janice J Eng
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 2.  What Is Being Trained? How Divergent Forms of Plasticity Compete To Shape Locomotor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  J Russell Huie; Kazuhito Morioka; Jenny Haefeli; Adam R Ferguson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 5.269

3.  Multi-muscle electrical stimulation and stand training: Effects on standing.

Authors:  Kamyar Momeni; Arvind Ramanujam; Erica L Garbarini; Gail F Forrest
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Development and validation of a bowel-routine-based self-report questionnaire for sacral sparing after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  N Liu; H Xing; M-W Zhou; F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Intramedullary Lesion Length on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a Strong Predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Conversion Following Decompressive Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Charles A Sansur; David M Ibrahimi; J Marc Simard; David S Hersh; Elizabeth Le; Cara Diaz; Jennifer Massetti; Noori Akhtar-Danesh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Rehabilitation Strategies after Spinal Cord Injury: Inquiry into the Mechanisms of Success and Failure.

Authors:  Marie-Pascale Côté; Marion Murray; Michel A Lemay
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Elevated MMP-9 in the lumbar cord early after thoracic spinal cord injury impedes motor relearning in mice.

Authors:  Christopher N Hansen; Lesley C Fisher; Rochelle J Deibert; Lyn B Jakeman; Haoqian Zhang; Linda Noble-Haeusslein; Susan White; D Michele Basso
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Supraspinal Control Predicts Locomotor Function and Forecasts Responsiveness to Training after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Edelle C Field-Fote; Jaynie F Yang; D Michele Basso; Monica A Gorassini
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 9.  A Systematic Review of Experimental Strategies Aimed at Improving Motor Function after Acute and Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Joyce Gomes-Osman; Mar Cortes; James Guest; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  Current state of balance assessment during transferring, sitting, standing and walking activities for the spinal cord injured population: A systematic review.

Authors:  Tarun Arora; Alison Oates; Kaylea Lynd; Kristin E Musselman
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 1.985

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.