| Literature DB >> 22920387 |
Christopher G Sobey1, Emma S Jones1, Seyoung Lee1, Vanessa H Brait1, Thiruma V Arumugam2, Megan A Evans1, Hyun Ah Kim1, Robert E Widdop1, Grant R Drummond1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intracerebral administration of the angiotensin II type 2 receptor (AT2R) agonist, CGP42112, is neuroprotective in a rat model of ischemic stroke. To explore further its possible cellular target(s) and therapeutic utility, we firstly examined whether CGP42112 may exert direct protective effects on primary neurons following glucose deprivation in vitro. Secondly, we tested whether CGP42112 is effective when administered systemically in a mouse model of cerebral ischemia.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22920387 PMCID: PMC3492080 DOI: 10.1186/2040-7378-4-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Transl Stroke Med ISSN: 2040-7378
Figure 1Mean percentage neuronal cell death.A. Data are shown for cells exposed to normal conditions (NC) or glucose deprivation with vehicle for 24 h (GD). Other cells exposed to GD were treated with CGP42112 at 1x10-8 M (CGP-8), 1x10-7 M (CGP-7), 1x10-6 M (CGP-6) (n = 8) (*P < 0.05 vs. NC). B. Data are shown for cells exposed to normal conditions (i.e. 24 h NC) or glucose deprivation with vehicle (24 h GD) or 3 concentrations of CGP42112 in the presence of PD123319 at 1x10-6 M (PD-6). Data for GD with PD123319 alone (n = 6) are also shown (*P < 0.05 vs. vehicle; NS P > 0.05 vs. vehicle). C. Data are shown for cells exposed to normal conditions (NC) or glucose deprivation (GD) with vehicle (24 h GD) or 1x10-6 M CGP42112 (CGP-6) in the absence or presence of 1x10-7 M candesartan (CV-7) (n = 7; *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle).
Figure 2Mean percentage neuronal cell death.A. Data are shown for cells exposed to normal conditions (NC) or glucose deprivation with vehicle for 24 h (GD). Other cells exposed to GD were treated with Compound 21 at 1x10-8 M (C21-8), 1x10-7 M (C21-7), 1x10-6 M (C21-6) (n = 6) (NS P > 0.05 vs. vehicle). B. Cells were treated with Compound 21 in the presence of 1x10-6 M PD123319 (PD-6) (n = 6) (NS P > 0.05 vs. vehicle).
Figure 3Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and neurological function in vehicle- and CGP42112-treated mice. Data for rCBF (A), neurological deficit score (B) and hanging-wire test (C) are shown for animals 24 h following cerebral ischemia and treatment with either vehicle (Veh; n = 16) or CGP42112 (n = 19; *P < 0.05 vs. vehicle).
Figure 4Total brain infarct and edema volume in vehicle- (Veh; n = 16) and CGP42112-treated mice (n = 19; * < 0.05 vs. vehicle).A. Images of representative coronal brain sections from vehicle- (left) and CGP42112-treated (right) mice 24 h after cerebral ischemia. Total infarct volume (B) and brain edema volume (C).
Figure 5Cortical (A-B) and subcortical (C-D) brain infarct volume and distribution in vehicle- (Veh; n = 16) and CGP42112-treated mice (n = 19; * < 0.05 vs. vehicle).