Literature DB >> 22919684

Maternal factors pre- and during delivery contribute to gut microbiota shaping in newborns.

Giuliano Rigon1, Cristina Vallone, Valeria Lucantoni, Fabrizio Signore.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22919684      PMCID: PMC3417649          DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol        ISSN: 2235-2988            Impact factor:   5.293


× No keyword cloud information.
Normally at birth, the human infant gut is sterile, but it becomes fully colonized within a few days with bacteria from the mother and the environment (Salminen and Isolauri, 2008). An altered gut microbiota composition has been associated with attenuated immune responses to inflammation in experimental models and humans (Fanaro et al., 2003; Ly et al., 2011; Vebø et al., 2011). The pioneer microbiota of the neonate may affect future actions of the immune system (Conroy and Walker, 2008; Karlsson et al., 2011; Vael et al., 2011). The relation between the neonatal gut microbiota and the development of allergic diseases and obesity has led to several clinical trials of probiotics (live bacteria given orally that allow for intestinal colonization) in human subjects both during pregnancy or in the neonatal period. Probiotic trials thus far have failed to show a consistent preventive effect (Litonjua, 2012). Many factors contribute to the shaping of this complex ecosystem, and all must be taken into account. Maternal gut microbiota is a factor in neonatal colonization. Reduced concentrations of Bifidobacterium and Bacteroides and increased numbers of Staphylococcus, Enterobacteriaceae were detected in overweight compared with normal-weight pregnant women (Santacruz et al., 2010). Increased Enterobacteriaceae numbers were related to increased ferritin and reduced transferrin, while Bacteroides numbers were related to increased HDL-cholesterol and folic acid levels (Santacruz et al., 2010; Table 1).
Table 1

Effects of neonatal physiological and pathological conditions on gut microbiota onset and distribution.

Bacterial speciesPrevalence/abundanceDecrease/abatementPhysiological conditionsPathological conditionsReference
Escherichia coli+++Increased ferritin/reduced transferrinSantacruz et al. (2010)
Bacteroides spp.+++Increased HDL-cholesterol/folic acidSantacruz et al. (2010)
Staphylococcus spp., E. coli+++Overweight pregnant womenSantacruz et al. (2010)
Bifidobacterium spp., Bacteroides spp.+++Overweight pregnant womenSantacruz et al. (2010)
Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp.+++Baby breast feedingFanaro et al. (2003), Rinne et al. (2006)
Clostridium, Bacteroides, Enterococcus spp.+++Baby breast feedingFallani et al. (2010), Penders et al. (2006)
Bacteroides spp., Atopobium spp., Bifidobacterium spp.+++Perinatal antibiotics treatmentPenders et al. (2006)
Bacteroides spp.+++Mouse obesityLey et al. (2005)
Firmicutes+++Mouse obesityLey et al. (2005)
Clostridium spp., Bacteroides spp., Staphylococcus spp., Akkermansia spp.+++Overweight pregnant womenCollado et al. (2010)
Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp.+++Extremely low-birth-weight infantsFanaro et al. (2003), Rougé et al. (2010), Dai and Walker (1999)
Clostridium spp., Bacillus spp.+++Vaginal deliveryPenders et al. (2006), Lif Holgerson et al. (2011), Huurre et al. (2008)
Bacteroides spp., Atopobium spp., Bifidobacterium spp.+++Cesarean sectionFallani et al. (2010)
Bifidobacterium spp.+++Probiotic administration during pregnancyGueimonde et al. (2006)
Lactobacillus spp., Enterococcus spp., Clostridium spp.+++Probiotic administration during pregnancyRinne et al. (2006)
Effects of neonatal physiological and pathological conditions on gut microbiota onset and distribution. Population related factors are significant (Bäckhed, 2011). Karlsson et al. (2011) observed Lactobacillus in all neonates, other bacterial groups were detected only in 14–30% of the subjects (Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and the Bacteroides fragilis group). Fallani compared neonatal fecal samples from Sweden, Scotland, Germany, Italy, and Spain. Bifidobacterium genus was predominant (40% average proportion of total detectable bacteria), followed by Bacteroides (11.4%) and Enterobacteria (7.5%; Fallani et al., 2010). Differences in colonization pattern can be observed between infants in industrialized and developing countries (Adlerberth, 2008). Siblings increase the numbers of Bifidobacteria, while pets and country residence show no significance (Penders et al., 2006). Dominguez observed a neonatal colonization corresponding to maternal skin population in case of cesarean section and coincident with maternal vaginal flora in case of vaginal delivery (Dominguez-Bello et al., 2010). Breastfeeding is a significant factor in the determination of neonatal gut microbiota. During lactation, cells from gut-associated lymphoid tissue travel to the breast via the lymphatics and peripheral blood (Donnet-Hughes et al., 2010). Breast milk gives a flora rich in Bifidobacterium spp. Other obligate anaerobes, such as Clostridium spp. and Bacteroides spp., are more rarely isolated and also Enterobacteria and Enterococci are relatively few. Formula-fed babies are often colonized by other anaerobes in addition to Bifidobacteria and by facultatively anaerobic bacteria; the development of a “Bifidus flora” is unusual (Fanaro et al., 2003). Breastfeeding leads to higher Lactobacillus and lower count of E. coli, Clostridium difficile, B. fragilis (Penders et al., 2006; Fallani et al., 2010). After delivery, breastfeeding continues to enhance the original inoculum by specific lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria and bacteria from the mother's skin enabling the infant gut microbiota to be dominated by Bifidobacteria. Modifying this exposure can take place by probiotic bacteria when breastfeeding is not possible (Conroy and Walker, 2008; Salminen and Isolauri, 2008). Fecal Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus/Enterococcus spp. counts were higher in breastfed than formula-fed infants at 6 months (Rinne et al., 2006; Table 1). Maternal and neonatal medical treatment is an issue. Newborns from mothers treated with antibiotics perinatally had lower proportions of Bacteroides and members of the Atopobium cluster. Antibiotics lower the count of Bifidobacteria and B. fragilis group, according to Penders et al. (2006). Gut microbiota is influenced by perinatal conditions. Ley et al. (2005) found that obese pregnant mice have a 50% reduction in Bacteroidetes and a proportional increase in Firmicutes compared to normal controls on the same diet. One mechanism here could lie in the ability of specific gut microbes to induce excessive energy harvests (Collado et al., 2008). Overweight women show increases of Clostridium, Bacteroides, Staphylococcus, and Akkermansia during pregnancy according to the author. Their infants’ fecal microbial composition was related to the weight and weight gain of their mothers during pregnancy (Collado et al., 2010; Table 1). In extremely low-birth-weight infants characterized by antibiotic therapy, parenteral nutrition, delayed oral feedings, and intubation the gut is colonized by a small number of bacterial species; Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp. are seldom identified (Fanaro et al., 2003). Rougé et al. (2010) indicated that the gastrointestinal tract of preterm infants, born less than 33 weeks, has a low biodiversity. According to Dai and Walker (1999), premature infants requiring intensive care acquire intestinal organisms slowly, and the establishment of bifidobacterial flora is retarded. The aberrant colonization of the premature infant may contribute to the development of necrotizing enterocolitis. Neonatal gut is related to mode of delivery. In infants born by cesarean section (C-section) the establishment of a stable flora is delayed (Fanaro et al., 2003). Significantly more bacterial taxa were detected in the infants delivered vaginally (79 species/species clusters) compared with infants delivered by C-section (54 species/species clusters; Lif Holgerson et al., 2011). Newborns delivered by C-section had lower proportions of Bacteroides and members of the Atopobium cluster (Fallani et al., 2010). Infants delivered by C-section had fewer bifidobacteria at an early age and were shown to mount a stronger humoral immune response (Huurre et al., 2008). At 1 month of age, the total gut bacterial cell counts per 1 g feces were higher in vaginally delivered infants. This distinction was mainly due to the greater number of Bifidobacteria in vaginally delivered infants. During the first year of life, the total number of immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgG-, and IgM-secreting cells was lower in infants born by vaginal delivery than in those born by C-section, possibly reflecting different antigen exposure (Huurre et al., 2008). Dominguez observed a neonatal colonization corresponding to maternal skin population in case of c-section and coincident with maternal vaginal flora in case of vaginal delivery (Dominguez-Bello et al., 2010). An extensive Netherlands study shows conclusively that vaginal delivery brings on a faster colonization by all species, mostly Bifidobacteria, with high B. fragilis and low C. difficile counts (Table 1). High Clostridium counts were associated with clinical complications and hospital admittance (Penders et al., 2006). Most significantly things change with age. The bacterial flora is usually heterogeneous during the first days of life, independently of feeding habits. After the first week of life, a stable bacterial flora is usually established (Fanaro et al., 2003). The first bacteria to establish in the neonatal gut are usually aerobic or facultative anaerobic bacteria, like Enterobacteria, Enterococci, and Staphylococci. During their growth, they consume oxygen and change the intestinal milieu making it suitable for the proliferation of anaerobic bacteria. Bifidobacterium, Clostridium, and Bacteroides are among the first anaerobes establishing in the microbiota. As more oxygen-sensitive species establish and the complexity of the microbiota increases, the population sizes of aerobic and facultative bacteria decline (Adlerberth, 2008). Vebo showed a decrease in Staphylococci from 10 days to 4 months and a peak of Bifidobacteria and Bacteroides at 4 months (Gueimonde et al., 2006; Vebø et al., 2011). Clinical effects of an altered neonatal colonization have been noticed. In the past 20–30 years, the prevalence of atopic diseases, particularly among children in the Western world, has increased. It has been suggested that Western lifestyle may have reduced the overall exposure to microbial stimulation early in life (øien et al., 2006). The pioneer microbiota of the neonate may affect future actions of the immune system (Karlsson et al., 2011). A close relationship between allergic sensitization and the development of the intestinal microflora may occur in infancy. Intestinal micro-organisms could down-regulate the allergic inflammation by counterbalancing type 2 T-helper cell responses and by enhancing antigen exclusion through an immunoglobulin Ig-A response (Kirjavainen and Gibson, 1999). According to Vael et al. (2011), early colonization by Clostridium coccoides or B. fragilis could lead to asthma in later life. Altered gut colonization could lead to obesity in later life. Germ-free mice are protected against developing diet-induced obesity. The gut microbiota affects expression of secreted proteins in the gut, which modulate lipid metabolism in peripheral organs and is a source of pro-inflammatory molecules that augment adipose inflammation and macrophage recruitment by signaling through the innate immune system (Bäckhed, 2011). An intriguing observation is that neonates treated with antibiotics during the first 6 months of life had an increased risk of overweight among children of normal-weight mothers (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.09–2.17) with a decreased risk of overweight among children of overweight mothers (Ajslev et al., 2011). Trials with probiotic precursors administered to the mother have been reported. Maternal administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (L-GG, ATCC 53103) during late pregnancy promotes a Bifidobacteria profile of infant gut microbiota, similar to that of a healthy breastfed infant. Microbial diversity in neonatal gut microbiota was not influenced by this probiotic administration at 1 week postpartum (Ismail et al., 2012). In a prospective randomized study Gueimonde et al. (2006) showed that maternal L. rhamnosus administration during late pregnancy is associated in the neonates at 5 days of age with a higher occurrence of Bifidobacterium brevis and lower of Bifidobacterium adolescentis. Probiotic supplementation has been tried in newborns. One-hundred thirty-two neonates were randomized in a placebo group and the others were treated with L. rhamnosus. For 6 months after delivery, mothers had been treated prenatally for 6 months in the treatment group. At 6 months, there were less Clostridia in feces in the placebo compared with the probiotic group (P = 0.026), whereas after long-term follow-up at 2 years, there were less Lactobacilli/Enterococci and Clostridia in feces in the probiotic group than in the placebo group (Rinne et al., 2006; Table 1). Rinne showed in another randomized trial of neonatal L. rhamnosus administration that at 3 months IgG-secreting cells in breastfed infants supplemented with probiotics was higher (Rinne et al., 2005). Chierici underlined the importance of a probiotic diet with bifidogenic activity of non-digestible but fermentable carbohydrates (Chierici et al., 2003). In conclusion, we infer that many observations indicate the significance of bacterial neonatal colonization of the gut. A tighter control of factors influencing this phenomenon is warranted if results of preventive or therapeutic measures, or effects of maternal, or perinatal conditions is to be identified.
  30 in total

1.  Intestinal microbiota and its effect on the immune system--a nested case-cohort study on prevention of atopy among small children in Trondheim: the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Torbjørn Øien; Ola Storrø; Roar Johnsen
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  Intestinal immune health.

Authors:  Michelle E Conroy; W Allan Walker
Journal:  Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program       Date:  2008

3.  Probiotic intervention in the first months of life: short-term effects on gastrointestinal symptoms and long-term effects on gut microbiota.

Authors:  Minna Rinne; Marko Kalliomäki; Seppo Salminen; Erika Isolauri
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.839

4.  Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy.

Authors:  John Penders; Carel Thijs; Cornelis Vink; Foekje F Stelma; Bianca Snijders; Ischa Kummeling; Piet A van den Brandt; Ellen E Stobberingh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Effect of probiotics and breastfeeding on the bifidobacterium and lactobacillus/enterococcus microbiota and humoral immune responses.

Authors:  Minna Rinne; Marko Kalliomaki; Heikki Arvilommi; Seppo Salminen; Erika Isolauri
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 6.  Opportunities for improving the health and nutrition of the human infant by probiotics.

Authors:  Seppo Salminen; Erika Isolauri
Journal:  Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program       Date:  2008

Review 7.  Factors influencing the establishment of the intestinal microbiota in infancy.

Authors:  Ingegerd Adlerberth
Journal:  Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program       Date:  2008

8.  Mode of delivery - effects on gut microbiota and humoral immunity.

Authors:  Anu Huurre; Marko Kalliomäki; Samuli Rautava; Minna Rinne; Seppo Salminen; Erika Isolauri
Journal:  Neonatology       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 4.035

9.  Distinct composition of gut microbiota during pregnancy in overweight and normal-weight women.

Authors:  Maria Carmen Collado; Erika Isolauri; Kirsi Laitinen; Seppo Salminen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  Obesity alters gut microbial ecology.

Authors:  Ruth E Ley; Fredrik Bäckhed; Peter Turnbaugh; Catherine A Lozupone; Robin D Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of Risk and Preventive Factors for Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Premature Newborns. A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ana M Campos-Martinez; J Expósito-Herrera; M Gonzalez-Bolívar; E Fernández-Marin; Jose Uberos
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.569

Review 2.  Potential NICU Environmental Influences on the Neonate's Microbiome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Lacey E Hartz; Wanda Bradshaw; Debra H Brandon
Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.968

Review 3.  Interaction of dietary compounds, especially polyphenols, with the intestinal microbiota: a review.

Authors:  Aleksandra Duda-Chodak; Tomasz Tarko; Paweł Satora; Paweł Sroka
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.614

Review 4.  Fertility Sparing Treatments in Endometrial Cancer Patients: The Potential Role of the New Molecular Classification.

Authors:  Anna Franca Cavaliere; Federica Perelli; Simona Zaami; Marco D'Indinosante; Irene Turrini; Marco Giusti; Giuseppe Gullo; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Alberto Mattei; Giovanni Scambia; Annalisa Vidiri; Fabrizio Signore
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Human gut microbiota: onset and shaping through life stages and perturbations.

Authors:  Lorenza Putignani
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 5.293

6.  Environmental determinants of islet autoimmunity (ENDIA): a pregnancy to early life cohort study in children at-risk of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Megan A S Penno; Jennifer J Couper; Maria E Craig; Peter G Colman; William D Rawlinson; Andrew M Cotterill; Timothy W Jones; Leonard C Harrison
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.125

Review 7.  Allergic diseases among children: nutritional prevention and intervention.

Authors:  Mohamed A Hendaus; Fatima A Jomha; Mohammad Ehlayel
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 2.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.