| Literature DB >> 22919349 |
Rebecca Schüle1, Christine Dictus, Benito Campos, Feng Wan, Jörg Felsberg, Rezvan Ahmadi, Franz-Simon Centner, Niels Grabe, Guido Reifenberger, Justo L Bermejo, Andreas Unterberg, Christel Herold-Mende.
Abstract
Aberrant wnt pathway activation through cytoplasmic stabilization of β-catenin is crucial for the development of various human malignancies. In gliomagenesis, the role of canonical (i.e., β-catenin-dependent) signalling is largely unknown. Here, we studied canonical wnt pathway activation in 15 short-term cultures from high-grade gliomas and potential pathomechanisms leading to cytoplasmic β-catenin accumulation. Furthermore, we assessed the prognostic relevance of β-catenin expression in a tissue microarray comprising 283 astrocytomas. Expression of β-catenin, its transcriptional cofactors TCF-1 and TCF-4 as well as GSK-3β and APC, constituents of the β-catenin degradation complex was confirmed by RT-PCR in all cultures. A cytoplasmic β-catenin pool was detectable in 13/15 cultures leading to some transcriptional activity assessed by luciferase reporter gene assay in 8/13. Unlike other malignancies, characteristic mutations of β-catenin and APC leading to cytoplasmic stabilization of β-catenin were excluded by direct sequencing or protein truncation test. In patient tissues, β-catenin expression was directly and its degradation product's (β-catenin-P654) expression was inversely correlated with WHO grade. Increased β-catenin expression and low β-catenin-P654 expression were associated with shorter survival. Altogether, we report on potential canonical wnt pathway activation in high-grade gliomas and demonstrate that β-catenin expression in astrocytomas is associated with increased malignancy and adverse outcome.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22919349 PMCID: PMC3419426 DOI: 10.1100/2012/697313
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Primer sequences used for PCR.
| Target | Forward primer | Reverse primer |
|---|---|---|
|
| 5′-AGCGTGGACAATGGCTACTCAA-3′ | 5′-AAACATAGCAGCTCGTACCCTCT-3′ |
| APC | 5′-AGGACATG TTCTATGCCT TATGCC-3′ | 5′-CTTGGCATTAGATGAAGGTGTGGA-3′ |
| GSK-3 | 5′-ATCGGGATATTAAACCGCAGAACC-3′ | 5′-CTGTGTAGTTTGGGTTCATTTCTCT-3′ |
| TCF1 | 5′-CCTCTCTGGCTTCTACTCCCT-3′ | 5′-CAGCCTGGGTATAGCTGCATGT-3′ |
| TCF4 | 5′-AGGCACAGCTGTTTGGTCTAGAA-3′ | 5′-TCTCAGGGCCACGCCATCTTCA-3′ |
| APC segment 1 codons 2–812 | 5′-GGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGAACAGACCACCATG GCTGCAGCTTCATATGATC-3′ | 5′-CTGACCTATTATCATCATGTCG-3′ |
| APC segment 2 codons 654–1225 | 5′-GGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGAACAGACCACCATG CAAATCCTAAGAGAGAACAACT-3′ | 5′-GAGGATC CATTAGATGAAGGTGTGGACG-3′ |
| APC segment 3 codons 1050–1693 | 5′-GGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGAACAGACCACCATG GCAAGACCCAAACACATAATAG-3′ | 5′-GAGGATC CTGTAGGAATGGTATCTCG-3′ |
| APC segment 4 codons 1582–2337 | 5′-GGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGAACAGACCACCATG GCCATGCCAACAAAGTCATCA-3′ | 5′-CTTATTCCATTTCTACCAGGGGAA-3′ |
| APC segment 5 codons 2123–2698 | 5′-GGATCCTAATACGACTCACTATAGGAACAGACCACCATGGGTTTATCTAGACAAGCTTCG-3′ | 5′-TTGAATCTTTAATGTTTGGATTTGC-3′ |
| APC | 5′-AGGACATGTTCTATGCCTTATGCC-3′ | 5′-CTTGGCATTAGATGAAGGTGTGGA-3′ |
| APC mutational hot spot at codon 1309 | 5′-AACGTCATGTGGATCAGCCTATTG-3′ | 5′-GCTGGCAATCGAACGACTCTCAA-3′ |
| APC mutational cluster region | 5′-TTTAGCAGATGTACTTCTGTCAGTT-3′ | 5′-ATAGGTCCTTTTCAGAATCAATAGT-3′ |
|
| 5′-CCAATCTACTAATGCTAATACTG-3′ | 5′-CTGCATTCTGACTTTCAGTAAGG-3′ |
| GAPDH | 5′-GGTGAAGGTCGGAGTCAACGGA-3′ | 5′-GAGGGATCTCGCTCCTGGAGGA-3′ |
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients included in TMA analysis.
| Histological diagnosis | Patients | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Glioblastoma | WHO IV | 221 (78.1) | |
| Anaplastic astrocytoma | WHO III | 17 (6.0) | |
| Diffuse astrocytoma | WHO II | 45 (15.9) | |
|
| |||
| Age | mean ( | ||
|
| |||
| Glioblastoma | WHO IV | 53.8 ± 12.8 | |
| Anaplastic astrocytoma | WHO III | 36.1 ± 14.2 | |
| Diffuse astrocytoma | WHO II | 33.6 ± 18.7 | |
|
| |||
| Gender | M : F | ||
|
| |||
| Glioblastoma | WHO IV | 133 : 88 | |
| Anaplastic astrocytoma | WHO III | 11 : 6 | |
| Diffuse astrocytoma | WHO II | 30 : 15 | |
|
| |||
| Extent of resection | Total | Subtotal/biopsy | |
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| Glioblastoma | WHO IV | 151 (68.3) | 70 (31.7) |
| Anaplastic astrocytoma | WHO III | 11 (64.7) | 6 (35.3) |
| Diffuse astrocytoma | WHO II | 33 (73.3) | 12 (26.7) |
|
| |||
| Adjuvant treatment† | Radiotherapy | Chemotherapy | |
|
|
| ||
|
| |||
| Glioblastoma | WHO IV | 186 (84.2) | 87 (39.4) |
| Anaplastic astrocytoma | WHO III | 16 (94.1) | 1 (5.9) |
| Diffuse astrocytoma | WHO II | 14 (31.1) | 3 (6.7) |
†Therapy at primary tumour diagnosis.
Figure 1(a) Gel electrophoresis showing expression of key players of the canonical wnt signalling pathway as assessed by RT-PCR. (b) (upper rows) Representative western blot analysis of 3 independent experiments displaying β-catenin expression in whole cell lysates and corresponding cytoplasmic fractions of high-grade glioma cultures. (lower graph) Quantification of the cytoplasmatic β-catenin fractions shown in (b). Expression levels were normalized to A172. (c) Transcriptional activity of β-catenin in glioma cultures as assessed by TOPFLASH/FOPFLASH reporter gene assay. Ordinate shows x-fold induction of the luciferase reporter gene in comparison to the control vector (FOPFLASH). Horizontal lines mark 1.5-fold and 2-fold reporter induction, respectively. Data indicate mean values of at least 3 independent experiments plus SD. (d) For theAPC truncation test, APC cDNA was amplified in five fragments and subsequently transcribed and translated in vitro. Products were separated by SDS-PAGE, blotted on a PVDF membrane, and stained with streptavidin peroxidase. No truncating mutations were found in any of the glioma cultures. Here, cDNA amplification (a), in vitro transcription (b) and in vitro translation (c) of fragment 3 that contains the mutation cluster region are shown. The colon cancer cell line SW480, which contains a homozygous truncating mutation at codon 1338, served as positive control. The molecular weight of the resulting protein fragment in this cell line is thereby reduced from about 70 kDa (full-length fragment 3) to 32 kDa.
Figure 2Immunofluorescent staining depicting β-catenin expression patterns in glioma cultures with no (NCH250 (b)) and moderately increased (NCH210 (a)) transcriptional activity and in the colon carcinoma cell line SW480 (c) known for its pronounced transcriptional activity. A preponderance of cytoplasmic and membranous rather than nuclear localization of β-catenin was confirmed in all cell lines analyzed. However, nuclear β-catenin levels (closed arrows) as a prerequisite for transcriptional activation were detected in single cells in NCH210 (a) and were relatively higher in SW480 (c). Scale bars represent 100 μm (a) and 50 μm (b and c), respectively.
Figure 3(a and b) Immunoreactivity of β-catenin (upper row) and β-catenin-P654 (lower row) in astrocytic gliomas of WHO grade II (left), WHO grade III (middle), and WHO gradeIV (right). Scale bars represent 100 μm. (c and d) Note that β-catenin immunoreactivity was significantly augmented with increasing WHO grade (c) while β-catenin-P654 expression significantly decreased in high-grade tumours (d). Columns indicate categories of staining frequencies.
Figure 4(a) Kaplan-Meier plot illustrating the correlation of patient outcome with β-catenin-P654 expression levels in the subgroup of low-grade astrocytomas. Expression of β-catenin-P654 is directly associated with a prolonged overall survival (OS). P value represents multivariate associations of staining frequencies with OS. (b) Immunofluorescence staining showing colocalization of the stem cell-associated filament protein nestin (red) and β-catenin (green). DAPI (blue) was used for nuclear counterstaining. Representative staining is shown in a primary glioblastoma tissue (white arrow heads represent double-positive cells; scale bars represent 150 μm). (c) Graphs show β-catenin and nestin mRNA expression in NCH421k cells infected with scrambled control or a shRNA directed against β-catenin. Data are shown as mean values ± SEM of four technical replicates.
Results from multivariate survival analysis. Hazard ratios were adjusted for WHO grade, age at diagnosis, and extent of tumour resection.
| Antigen expression | HR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
|
| ||
| In WHO grade II–IV (≤50% versus >50% positive cells) | 1.49 (0.83–2.69) | 0.18 |
| In WHO grade II (≤50% versus >50% positive cells) | Not determined | Not determined |
| In WHO grade III (≤50% versus >50% positive cells) | Not determined | Not determined |
| In WHO grade IV (≤50% versus >50% positive cells) | 1.63 (0.90–2.95) | 0.10 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
|
| ||
| In WHO grade II–IV (≤5% versus >5% positive cells) | 0.85 (0.63–1.14) | 0.27 |
| In WHO grade II (≤5% versus >5% positive cells) | 0.37 (0.14–0.96) | 0.04 |
| In WHO grade III (≤5% versus >5% positive cells) | 0.65 (0.10–4.04) | 0.64 |
| In WHO grade IV (≤5% versus >5% positive cells) | 0.96 (0.70–1.32) | 0.81 |