Literature DB >> 22918993

Choice and doses of antibacterial agents for cement spacers in treatment of prosthetic joint infections: review of published studies.

D Iarikov1, H Demian, D Rubin, J Alexander, S Nambiar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Addition of antibacterial drugs to interim antibacterial cement spacers (ACSs) is considered to be standard of care for surgical revision in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). We reviewed published studies evaluating the choice and doses of antibacterials in spacers.
METHODS: We conducted a PubMed search of all clinical study reports evaluating the use of ACSS in a 2-stage hip or knee arthroplasty for treatment of PJI (1988 through August 2011). The trial design, antibacterials used, and end points studied were analyzed.
RESULTS: No randomized trials were found comparing either ACSs with different concentrations of antibacterials or ACSs with or without antibacterials. Most of the studies were uncontrolled and used various time points to evaluate the outcome. Twenty publications that reported doses of antibacterials in spacers and had a follow-up of ≥ 24 months after the second stage were selected for review. Most ACSs included vancomycin and aminoglycosides. The doses of aminoglycosides and vancomycin ranged from 0.25 to 4.8 g and from 1 to 4 g, respectively, per 4 g of cement. No association between reported eradication of the infection and antibacterial load was found.
CONCLUSIONS: Published data do not allow evaluation of whether antibacterials in temporary cement spacers provide additional benefits in the treatment of PJI, compared with systemic antibacterials, and are not sufficient to support recommendations on dosages. Complications of ACSs have not been consistently analyzed. Prospective randomized trials comparing spacers with and without antibacterials or spacers with different loads of antibacterials are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ACSs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22918993     DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  26 in total

1.  The use of spacers (static and mobile) in infection knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Mazzucchelli; Federica Rosso; Antongiulio Marmotti; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Matteo Bruzzone; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  The Otto Aufranc Award: Modifiable versus nonmodifiable risk factors for infection after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Guy Maoz; Michael Phillips; Joseph Bosco; James Slover; Anna Stachel; Ifeoma Inneh; Richard Iorio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Prosthetic Joint Infections: an Update.

Authors:  C L Abad; A Haleem
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Antibiotic-loaded synthetic calcium sulfate beads for prevention of bacterial colonization and biofilm formation in periprosthetic infections.

Authors:  R P Howlin; M J Brayford; J S Webb; J J Cooper; S S Aiken; P Stoodley
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Static antibiotic spacers augmented by calcium sulphate impregnated beads in revision TKA: Surgical technique and review of literature.

Authors:  Salvatore Risitano; Luigi Sabatini; Francesco Atzori; Alessandro Massè; Pier Francesco Indelli
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-21

6.  Two-stage treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty: two to thirteen year experience using an articulating preformed spacer.

Authors:  Claudio Carlo Castelli; Valerio Gotti; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-26       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Antimicrobial distribution from local delivery depends on dose : a pilot study with MRI.

Authors:  Alex McLaren; Morgan B Giers; James Fraser; Luke Hosack; Michael R Caplan; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Industrially prefabricated cement spacers: do vancomycin- and gentamicin-impregnated spacers offer any advantage?

Authors:  Pablo S Corona; Victor Barro; Marye Mendez; Enric Cáceres; Xavier Flores
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  Prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Aaron J Tande; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Local gentamicin delivery from resorbable viscous hydrogels is therapeutically effective.

Authors:  Derek Overstreet; Alex McLaren; Francis Calara; Brent Vernon; Ryan McLemore
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.