Alan R Zinsmeister1, Duane Burton, Michael Camilleri. 1. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. S.W., Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Intra- and inter-subject coefficients of variation (COV) of scintigraphic colonic transit (SCT) are well characterized. SCT response to therapy predicts clinical efficacy of experimental medications in lower functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). AIM: To compare COVs for bowel function with pharmacodynamic (PD) colonic transit geometric center (GC) as endpoints in lower FGID studies. METHODS: We evaluated data from placebo arm of 9 phase IIA, parallel-group, clinical trials of PD effects of linaclotide, dexloxiglumide, renzapride, elobixibat, ROSE 010, and chenodeoxycholate in lower FGID with constipation, and pexacerafont, VSL#3, and colesevelam in lower FGID with diarrhea. Patients completed daily diaries for at least 7 days of stool frequency, consistency (7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale), and ease of passage (7-point scale from manual disimpaction to incontinence). Seventeen patients receivedplacebo in 2 separate studies allowing assessment of intra-patient COVs. We calculated sample sizes required to demonstrate a 30 % effect size for colonic transit, stool frequency, consistency and ease of passage for patients with lower FGID with constipation and, separately, diarrhea. RESULTS: COV(inter) from 87 patients and COV(intra) from 17 patients are reported. Generally, COV(intra) is somewhat greater than COV(inter). The COVs for PD endpoints are lower than for clinical endpoints; however, clinically relevant effects can be identified with modest (~50 %) increases in the sample size using parallel-group design studies. CONCLUSION: Phase IIA studies that incorporate clinical and PD endpoints are feasible in lower FGID associated with constipation or diarrhea. Crossover design would require lower sample size for most endpoints compared to parallel-group studies.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Intra- and inter-subject coefficients of variation (COV) of scintigraphic colonic transit (SCT) are well characterized. SCT response to therapy predicts clinical efficacy of experimental medications in lower functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID). AIM: To compare COVs for bowel function with pharmacodynamic (PD) colonic transit geometric center (GC) as endpoints in lower FGID studies. METHODS: We evaluated data from placebo arm of 9 phase IIA, parallel-group, clinical trials of PD effects of linaclotide, dexloxiglumide, renzapride, elobixibat, ROSE 010, and chenodeoxycholate in lower FGID with constipation, and pexacerafont, VSL#3, and colesevelam in lower FGID with diarrhea. Patients completed daily diaries for at least 7 days of stool frequency, consistency (7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale), and ease of passage (7-point scale from manual disimpaction to incontinence). Seventeen patients received placebo in 2 separate studies allowing assessment of intra-patient COVs. We calculated sample sizes required to demonstrate a 30 % effect size for colonic transit, stool frequency, consistency and ease of passage for patients with lower FGID with constipation and, separately, diarrhea. RESULTS: COV(inter) from 87 patients and COV(intra) from 17 patients are reported. Generally, COV(intra) is somewhat greater than COV(inter). The COVs for PD endpoints are lower than for clinical endpoints; however, clinically relevant effects can be identified with modest (~50 %) increases in the sample size using parallel-group design studies. CONCLUSION: Phase IIA studies that incorporate clinical and PD endpoints are feasible in lower FGID associated with constipation or diarrhea. Crossover design would require lower sample size for most endpoints compared to parallel-group studies.
Authors: Michael Camilleri; Maria Vazquez-Roque; Johanna Iturrino; Amy Boldingh; Duane Burton; Sanna McKinzie; Banny S Wong; Archana S Rao; Enda Kenny; Maria Månsson; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: Filippo Cremonini; Michael Camilleri; Sanna McKinzie; Paula Carlson; Christopher E Camilleri; Duane Burton; George Thomforde; Raul Urrutia; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Michael Camilleri; Sanna McKinzie; Jean Fox; Amy Foxx-Orenstein; Duane Burton; George Thomforde; Kari Baxter; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Viola Andresen; Michael Camilleri; Irene A Busciglio; April Grudell; Duane Burton; Sanna McKinzie; Amy Foxx-Orenstein; Caroline B Kurtz; Vineeta Sharma; Jeffrey M Johnston; Mark G Currie; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2007-07-03 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Seth Sweetser; Michael Camilleri; Sara J Linker Nord; Duane D Burton; Lorna Castenada; Robert Croop; Gary Tong; Randy Dockens; Alan R Zinsmeister Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2009-04-02 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: H Halawi; P Vijayvargiya; I Busciglio; I Oduyebo; D Khemani; M Ryks; D Rhoten; D Burton; L A Szarka; A Acosta; M Camilleri Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Subhankar Chakraborty; Kelly Feuerhak; Anjani Muthyala; William S Harmsen; Kent R Bailey; Adil E Bharucha Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-08-18 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Robert A Hauser; Dean Sutherland; Juan A Madrid; Maria Angeles Rol; Steven Frucht; Stuart Isaacson; Fernando Pagan; Brian N Maddux; George Li; Winona Tse; Benjamin L Walter; Rajeev Kumar; Daniel Kremens; Mark F Lew; Aaron Ellenbogen; Odinachi Oguh; Alberto Vasquez; William Kinney; Matt Lowery; Maria Resnick; Nicole Huff; Jerry Posner; Karla V Ballman; Brian E Harvey; Michael Camilleri; Michael Zasloff; Denise Barbut Journal: Clin Park Relat Disord Date: 2019-07-02