Literature DB >> 22918167

High proliferation is associated with inferior outcome in male breast cancer patients.

Cecilia Nilsson1, Anthoula Koliadi, Ida Johansson, Cecilia Ahlin, Sten Thorstenson, Leif Bergkvist, Ingrid Hedenfalk, Marie-Louise Fjällskog.   

Abstract

Assessment of proliferation is important in female breast cancer and individual treatment decisions are based upon its results, especially in the luminal subgroups. Gene expression analyses fail to group male breast cancer into the intrinsic subgroups previously established in female breast cancer. Even though proliferation has been shown to divide male breast cancer into molecular subgroups with different prognoses, the clinical importance of proliferation markers has not yet been elucidated. Previous studies in male breast cancer have demonstrated contradictory results regarding the prognostic impact of histological grade and Ki-67, parameters strongly associated with proliferation. The aim of the present project was to study proliferation in male breast cancer by assessing other proliferation-related markers viz. cyclins A, B, D1 and mitotic count. A total of 197 male breast cancer cases with accessible paraffin-embedded material and outcome data were investigated. Immunohistochemical stainings were performed on tissue microarrays. Kaplan-Meier estimates and the Cox proportional regression models were used for survival analyses with breast cancer death as the event. The subset of patients with high expression of cyclin A (hazard ratio (HR) 3.7; P=0.001) and B (HR 2.7; P=0.02) demonstrated a poorer survival. Furthermore, high mitotic count was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer death (HR 2.5; P=0.01). In contrast, cyclin D1 overexpression was predictive of better breast cancer survival (HR 0.3; P=0.001). In conclusion, high levels of cyclin A and B expression and an elevated mitotic count result in a two to threefold higher risk for breast cancer death, whereas cyclin D1 overexpression halves the risk. The clinical utility of these proliferation markers needs further elucidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22918167     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  5 in total

1.  Complement component 1, q subcomponent binding protein is a marker for proliferation in breast cancer.

Authors:  Olivia Jane Scully; Yingnan Yu; Agus Salim; Aye Aye Thike; George Wai-Cheong Yip; Gyeong Hun Baeg; Puay-Hoon Tan; Ken Matsumoto; Boon Huat Bay
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2015-01-07

Review 2.  Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of cyclin B expression in patients with breast cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xi Sun; Guangyan Zhangyuan; Liang Shi; Ying Wang; Beicheng Sun; Qiang Ding
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Marital Status and Survival of Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive Male Breast Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Ya-Yun Chi; An-An Wang; Yonghui Luo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-05-24

4.  The effect of antineoplastic drugs in a male spontaneous mammary tumor model.

Authors:  Stephanie N Shishido; Emma B Faulkner; Amanda Beck; Thu A Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The landscape of candidate driver genes differs between male and female breast cancer.

Authors:  Ida Johansson; Markus Ringnér; Ingrid Hedenfalk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.