Literature DB >> 22917958

A new behavioural apparatus to reduce animal numbers in multiple types of spontaneous object recognition paradigms in rats.

K E Ameen-Ali1, M J Eacott, A Easton.   

Abstract

Standard object recognition procedures assess animals' memory through their spontaneous exploration of novel objects or novel configurations of objects with other aspects of their environment. Such tasks are widely used in memory research, but also in pharmaceutical companies screening new drug treatments. However, behaviour in these tasks may be driven by influences other than novelty such as stress from handling which can subsequently influence performance. This extra-experimental variance means that large numbers of animals are required to maintain power. In addition, accumulation of data is time consuming as animals typically perform only one trial per day. The present study aimed to explore how effectively recognition memory could be tested with a new continual trials apparatus which allows for multiple trials within a session and reduced handling stress through combining features of delayed nonmatching-to-sample and spontaneous object recognition tasks. In this apparatus Lister hooded rats displayed performance significantly above chance levels in object recognition tasks (Experiments 1 and 2) and in tasks of object-location (Experiment 3) and object-in-context memory (Experiment 4) with data from only five animals or fewer per experimental group. The findings indicated that the results were comparable to those of previous reports in the literature and maintained statistical power whilst using less than a third of the number of animals typically used in spontaneous recognition paradigms. Overall, the results highlight the potential benefit of the continual trials apparatus to reduce the number of animals used in recognition memory tasks.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22917958     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  10 in total

Review 1.  Using touchscreen-delivered cognitive assessments to address the principles of the 3Rs in behavioral sciences.

Authors:  Timothy J Bussey; Lisa M Saksida; Christopher J Heath; Laura Lopez-Cruz
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 12.625

2.  The Discrimination Ratio derived from Novel Object Recognition tasks as a Measure of Recognition Memory Sensitivity, not Bias.

Authors:  Magali H Sivakumaran; Andrew K Mackenzie; Imogen R Callan; James A Ainge; Akira R O'Connor
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Dissociating the effects of distraction and proactive interference on object memory through tests of novelty preference.

Authors:  K Landreth; U Simanaviciute; J Fletcher; B Grayson; R A Grant; M H Harte; J Gigg
Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv       Date:  2021-04-27

4.  Effects of Dietary n-3 LCPUFA Supplementation on the Hippocampus of Aging Female Mice: Impact on Memory, Lipid Raft-Associated Glutamatergic Receptors and Neuroinflammation.

Authors:  Lucas Taoro-González; Daniel Pereda; Catalina Valdés-Baizabal; Miriam González-Gómez; José A Pérez; Fátima Mesa-Herrera; Ana Canerina-Amaro; Herminia Pérez-González; Covadonga Rodríguez; Mario Díaz; Raquel Marin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.208

5.  Lateral entorhinal cortex lesions impair odor-context associative memory in male rats.

Authors:  Bjorn M Persson; Veronika Ambrozova; Stephen Duncan; Emma R Wood; Akira R O'Connor; James A Ainge
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 4.433

6.  Rats use strategies to make object choices in spontaneous object recognition tasks.

Authors:  T W Ross; A Easton
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 7.  Advances in the behavioural testing and network imaging of rodent recognition memory.

Authors:  Lisa Kinnavane; Mathieu M Albasser; John P Aggleton
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 8.  Distributed interactive brain circuits for object-in-place memory: A place for time?

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Andrew J D Nelson
Journal:  Brain Neurosci Adv       Date:  2020-06-30

9.  Continual Trials Spontaneous Recognition Tasks in Mice: Reducing Animal Numbers and Improving Our Understanding of the Mechanisms Underlying Memory.

Authors:  Michele Chan; Madeline J Eacott; David J Sanderson; Jianfei Wang; Mu Sun; Alexander Easton
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Selective increases in inter-individual variability in response to environmental enrichment in female mice.

Authors:  Julia C Körholz; Sara Zocher; Anna N Grzyb; Benjamin Morisse; Alexandra Poetzsch; Fanny Ehret; Christopher Schmied; Gerd Kempermann
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.