Literature DB >> 22917456

Vascular closure device failure: we are getting better but not there yet.

Robert J Applegate.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22917456     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Predictors and treatments of Proglide-related complications in percutaneous endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Guohua Hu; Bin Chen; Weiguo Fu; Xin Xu; Daqiao Guo; Junhao Jiang; Jue Yang; Yuqi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Totally Percutaneous Access Using Perclose Proglide for Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Diseases.

Authors:  Eduardo Keller Saadi; Marina Saadi; Rodrigo Saadi; Ana Paula Tagliari; Bernardo Mastella
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

3.  Comparison of Complication and Success Rates of ProGlide Closure Device in Patients Undergoing TAVI and Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Authors:  Gündüz Durmuş; Erdal Belen; Akif Bayyiğit; Mehmet Mustafa Can
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Femoral artery access site closure with perclose suture mediated device in coronary interventions.

Authors:  Keshavamurthy Ganapathy Bhat; Ratheesh Kumar Janardhanapillai; Ajay Kumar Dabas; Davinder Singh Chadha; Ajay Jagannath Swamy; Amitoj Singh Chadha
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-12-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.