Literature DB >> 22916999

Optimal intervention intensity.

Elise Baker1.   

Abstract

Empirical evidence exists for many of the different interventions in speech-language pathology. However, relatively little is known about the optimal intensity of those interventions. In order for speech-language pathology services to be both effective and efficient speech-language pathologists need to know how to faithfully administer ideal doses of the active ingredients of interventions, in what forms, how often and for how long. This is the lead paper to a scientific forum on this fundamental yet under-studied issue of clinical practice. Borrowing from the work of Warren, Fey, and Yoder, the concept of intervention intensity is described. Issues involved in establishing the optimal intensity of interventions are identified, including what and how intervention goals are targeted. Given that speech-language pathology interventions can involve the delivery of therapeutic inputs (e.g., conversational recasts, questions) and/or clients carrying out an act (e.g., speech production, voice production, comprehending, naming, swallowing), a framework is proposed for measuring all potential inputs and acts that might contribute to the calculation of an intervention intensity. Client-, clinician-, condition-, and service-related variables that could influence the investigation and practical application of an optimal intervention intensity are also discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22916999     DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2012.700323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol        ISSN: 1754-9507            Impact factor:   2.484


  16 in total

1.  Aphasia treatment: intensity, dose parameters, and script training.

Authors:  Leora R Cherney
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.484

2.  Studying the impact of intensity is important but complicated.

Authors:  Paul Yoder; Marc E Fey; Steven F Warren
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 2.484

3.  Treatment for Word Retrieval in Semantic and Logopenic Variants of Primary Progressive Aphasia: Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes.

Authors:  Maya L Henry; H Isabel Hubbard; Stephanie M Grasso; Heather R Dial; Pélagie M Beeson; Bruce L Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Vocal function exercises for normal voice: The effects of varying dosage.

Authors:  Maria Bane; Vrushali Angadi; Emily Dressler; Richard Andreatta; Joseph Stemple
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 2.484

Review 5.  Learning from input and memory evolution: points of vulnerability on a pathway to mastery in word learning.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 2.484

6.  Intensive Language Action Therapy in Chronic Aphasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial Examining Guidance by Constraint.

Authors:  Jacquie Kurland; Edward J Stanek; Polly Stokes; Minming Li; Mary Andrianopoulos
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 7.  Is There a Research-Practice Dosage Gap in Aphasia Rehabilitation?

Authors:  Robert Cavanaugh; Christina Kravetz; Lillian Jarold; Yina Quique; Rose Turner; William S Evans
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  Dosages of Swallowing Exercises Prescribed in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Medical Record Audit.

Authors:  Jacinda Choy; Fereshteh Pourkazemi; Caitlin Anderson; Hans Bogaardt
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 2.733

9.  Speech Intervention Outcomes Associated With Word Lexicality and Intervention Intensity.

Authors:  Alycia Cummings; Janet Hallgrimson; Sarah Robinson
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Using ultrasound visual feedback to remediate velar fronting in preschool children: A pilot study.

Authors:  Qiwen Heng; Patricia McCabe; Jillian Clarke; Jonathan L Preston
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 1.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.